Search Results

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 September 2020.
Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer AG v European Commission.
Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Articles 4 and 21 – Criteria for approval – Review of approval – Plant protection products – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 – Active substances clothianidin and imidacloprid – Seeds treated with plant protection products containing those active substances – Prohibition of non-professional use – Precautionary principle.
Case C-499/18 P.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:735

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/783 of 29 May 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substance imidacloprid (Text with EEA relevance. )

C/2018/3180

OJ L 132, 30.5.2018, p. 31–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ L 132, 30.5.2018, p. 31–34

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2018.
Bayer CropScience AG and Others v European Commission.
Plant protection products — Active substances clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid — Review of approval — Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Prohibition of the use and sale of seeds treated with plant protection products containing the active substances in question — Article 49(2) of Regulation No 1107/2009 — Precautionary principle — Proportionality — Right to be heard — Non-contractual liability.
Cases T-429/13 and T-451/13.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:280

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 of 24 May 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, as regards the conditions of approval of the active substances clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid, and prohibiting the use and sale of seeds treated with plant protection products containing those active substances Text with EEA relevance

OJ L 139, 25.5.2013, p. 12–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
This document has been published in a special edition(s) ( HR)

OJ L 139, 25.5.2013, p. 12–26

Latest consolidated version:

19/12/2018

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 127/2012 of 14 February 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards an extension of the use of the active substance metazachlor Text with EEA relevance

OJ L 41, 15.2.2012, p. 12–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
This document has been published in a special edition(s) ( HR)

OJ L 41, 15.2.2012, p. 12–13

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 January 2012.
Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC v European Commission.
Plant protection products – Active substance diphenylamine – Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC – Withdrawal of authorisations of plant protection products containing that substance – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414 – Rights of the defence – Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007.
Case T-71/10.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:18

Commission Directive 2010/21/EU of 12 March 2010 amending Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards the specific provisions relating to clothianidin, thiamethoxam, fipronil and imidacloprid (Text with EEA relevance)

OJ L 65, 13.3.2010, p. 27–30 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ L 65, 13.3.2010, p. 27–30

Commission Directive 2009/155/EC of 30 November 2009 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards the purity level required of the active substance metazachlor (Text with EEA relevance)

OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 72–72 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 72–72

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 January 2012.
Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC v European Commission.
Plant protection products – Active substance diphenylamine – Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC – Withdrawal of authorisations of plant protection products containing that substance – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414 – Rights of the defence – Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007.
Case T-71/10.

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 January 2012.
Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC v European Commission.
Plant protection products – Active substance diphenylamine – Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC – Withdrawal of authorisations of plant protection products containing that substance – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414 – Rights of the defence – Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007.
Case T-71/10.