Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Search results

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Search Results

Domain: All, Subdomain: Case-law, Type of procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded, Defendant: Institutions, Search language: English, Include case-law summaries: True
2
Clear selection
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all

Case T-93/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — International Skating Union v Commission (Competition — Association of undertakings — Speed skating events — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Regulations of a sports federation — Balance between competition law and the specific nature of the sport — Sports betting — Court of Arbitration for Sport — Guidelines on the calculation of fines — Scope of territorial application of Article 101 TFEU — Restriction of competition by object — Corrective measures)

CELEX number:
62018TA0093
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Case T-541/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Changmao Biochemical Engineering v Commission (Dumping — Imports of tartaric acid originating in China — Extension of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Determination of the normal value — Protocol of Accession of China to the WTO — Analogue country methodology — Article 2(7) and Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Vulnerability of the Union industry — Likelihood of recurrence of injury — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

CELEX number:
62018TA0541
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Case T-515/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Fakro v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market for roof windows and flashings — Decision rejecting a complaint — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Access to the file — Principle of sound administration — Reasonable period — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — No EU interest — Probability of being able to establish the existence of an infringement — Predatory pricing — ‘Fighting brands’ — Rebates — Exclusivity)

CELEX number:
62018TA0515
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Case T-189/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Haikal v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Right to carry on an economic activity — Right to respect for private and family life)

CELEX number:
62019TA0189
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Case T-521/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Haswani v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Proportionality)

CELEX number:
62019TA0521
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Joined Cases T-236/17 and T-596/17: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Balti Gaas v Commission and INEA (Financial assistance under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020 — Field of trans-European energy infrastructure — Calls for proposals — Action for failure to act — No invitation to act — Inadmissibility — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory act — Partial inadmissibility — Decision rejecting a proposal — Manifest errors of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Competence of the Commission)

CELEX number:
62017TA0236
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Case T-289/20: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2020 — Facegym Ltd v EUIPO (FACEGYM) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark FACEGYM — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

CELEX number:
62020TB0289
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
18/12/2020

Case T-176/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — 3V Sigma v ECHA (REACH — Substance evaluation — UVASORB HEB — Decision of the ECHA requesting further information — Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Request seeking to identify potential transformation or degradation products of the substance — Proportionality — Need for the additional study requested — Relevant conditions and realistic conditions — Study temperature — Manifest error of assessment)

CELEX number:
62019TA0176
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Case T-438/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Pareto Trading v EUIPO — Bikor and Bikor Professional Color Cosmetics (BIKOR EGYPTIAN EARTH) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BIKOR EGYPTIAN EARTH — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

CELEX number:
62018TA0438
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020

Case T-665/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO (€$) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark €$ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

CELEX number:
62019TA0665
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/12/2020
2
Clear selection
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all