Search Results

Case C-568/18 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2019 — Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH v European Commission (Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(2), first indent — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 6(1) — Application of the exceptions concerning requests for access to environmental information — Documents drawn up by the European Commission under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Refusal of access — Subsequent transmission of the documents requested — Article 149 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — No further interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

OJ C 68, 2.3.2020, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 68, 2.3.2020, p. 19–20

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2019.
Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH v European Commission.
Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(2), first indent — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 6(1) — Application of the exceptions concerning requests for access to environmental information — Documents drawn up by the European Commission under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Refusal of access — Subsequent transmission of the documents requested — Article 149 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — No further interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate.
Case C-568/18 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:1092

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 December 2019.
Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych v European Commission.
Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(2), third indent — Exceptions to the right of access — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations — Documents concerning pending infringement proceedings — Detailed opinions issued in the course of a notification procedure under Directive 98/34/EC — Request for access — Refusal — Disclosure of documents requested in the course of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union — Disclosure — Inadmissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings — Continuation.
Case C-560/18 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:1052

Case C-82/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019 — TestBioTech eV, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility eV, Sambucus eV v European Commission, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (Appeal – Environment – Genetically modified products – Commission decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Request for internal review of the decision, submitted under the provisions relating to public participation in environmental decision-making – Rejection of the request)

OJ C 383, 11.11.2019, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 383, 11.11.2019, p. 6–6

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2019.
TestBioTech eV and Others v European Commission.
Appeal — Environment — Genetically modified products — Commission decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 10(1) — Request for internal review of the decision, submitted under the provisions relating to public participation in environmental decision-making — Rejection of the request.
Case C-82/17 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:719

Case C-458/19 P: Appeal brought on 14 June 2019 by ClientEarth against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 4 April 2019 in Case T-108/17: ClientEarth v Commission

OJ C 263, 5.8.2019, p. 35–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 263, 5.8.2019, p. 35–36

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 12 March 2019.
Criminal proceedings against Mathieu Blaise and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Foix.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Validity — Precautionary principle — Definition of the concept of ‘active substance’ — Combination of active substances — Reliability of the assessment procedure — Public access to the dossier — Tests of long-term toxicity — Pesticides — Glyphosate.
Case C-616/17.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:190