Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2018.
Helga Löber v Barclays Bank PLC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Special jurisdiction — Article 5(3) — Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict — Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur — Consumer, domiciled in a Member State, who bought, through a bank established in that Member State, securities issued by a bank established in another Member State — Jurisdiction to hear and determine the tort action brought by that consumer against the bank concerned).
Case C-304/17.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:701

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2018.
E.ON Czech Holding AG v Michael Dĕdouch and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Exclusive jurisdiction — Article 22(2) — Validity of decisions of the organs of companies or legal persons having their seat in the territory of a Member State — Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of that Member State — Decision of the general meeting of a company ordering the compulsory transfer to that company’s principal shareholder of the shares held by the company’s minority shareholders and determining the consideration to be paid to them by the principal shareholder — Judicial procedure for reviewing the reasonableness of that consideration.
Case C-560/16.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:167

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 16 November 2017.
E.ON Czech Holding AG v Michael Dĕdouch and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Exclusive jurisdiction — Article 22(2) — Validity of decisions of the organs of companies or legal persons having their seat in the territory of a Member State — Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of that Member State — Decision of the general meeting of a company ordering the compulsory transfer to that company’s principal shareholder of the shares held by the company’s minority shareholders and determining the consideration to be paid to them by the principal shareholder — Judicial procedure for reviewing the reasonableness of that consideration.
Case C-560/16.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2017:872

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2015.
Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Evonik Degussa GmbH and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Dortmund.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Special jurisdiction — Article 6(1) — Action, brought against several defendants domiciled in various Member States and which have participated in a cartel found to be contrary to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, seeking an order for the defendants to pay damages jointly and severally and for disclosure of information — Jurisdiction of the court seised with regard to the other defendants — Withdrawal of the action in relation to the defendant domiciled in the Member State of the court seised — Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict — Article 5(3) — Jurisdiction clauses — Article 23 — Effective enforcement of the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements, decisions and concerted practices.
Case C-352/13.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:335

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 11 December 2014.
Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Evonik Degussa GmbH and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Dortmund.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Special jurisdiction — Article 6(1) — Action, brought against several defendants domiciled in various Member States and which have participated in a cartel found to be contrary to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, seeking an order for the defendants to pay damages jointly and severally and for disclosure of information — Jurisdiction of the court seised with regard to the other defendants — Withdrawal of the action in relation to the defendant domiciled in the Member State of the court seised — Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict — Article 5(3) — Jurisdiction clauses — Article 23 — Effective enforcement of the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements, decisions and concerted practices.
Case C-352/13.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2014:2443

Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak delivered on 28 November 2012.
Land Berlin v Ellen Mirjam Sapir and Others.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesgerichtshof - Germany.
Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Articles 1(1) and 6.1 - Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ - Undue payment made by a State entity - Claim for recovery of that payment in legal proceedings - Determination of the court having jurisdiction in the case where claims are connected - Close connection between the claims - Defendant domiciled in a non-member State.
Case C-645/11.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2012:757

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 15 November 2012.
Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and Others v Samskip GmbH.
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bremen.
Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Articles 32 and 33 – Recognition of judgments – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Effects of a judgment on international jurisdiction – Jurisdiction clause.
Case C‑456/11.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2012:719

Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered on 29 March 2012.
Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV and Others.
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ’s‑Gravenhage.
Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Action for infringement of a European patent — Special and exclusive jurisdiction — Article 6(1) — More than one defendant — Article 22(4) — Validity of the patent called into question — Article 31 — Provisional, including protective, measures.
Case C‑616/10.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2012:193

Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak delivered on 12 April 2011.
Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Handelsgericht Wien - Austria.
Jurisdiction in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 6(1) - More than one defendant - Directive 93/98/EEC - Article 6 - Protection of photographs - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 2 - Reproduction - Use of a portrait photograph as a template to establish a photo-fit - Article 5(3)(d) - Exceptions and limitations as regards quotations - Article 5(3)(e) - Exceptions and limitations for the purposes of public security - Article 5(5).
Case C-145/10.

European Court Reports 2011 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:239

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 May 2011.
Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Frankfurt Branch.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Kammergericht Berlin - Germany.
Jurisdiction in civil matters - Articles 22(2) and 27 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State in which a company has its seat to adjudicate upon disputes relating to the validity of decisions of the company’s organs - Scope - Action brought by a legal person governed by public law for a declaration that a contract is void on account of alleged invalidity of the decisions of its organs relating to the conclusion of the contract - Lis pendens - Obligation on any court other than the court first seised to stay proceedings - Scope.
Case C-144/10.

European Court Reports 2011 I-03961

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:300