EUR-Lex Search results

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Search Results

Sort by

Case T-122/16: Action brought on 22 March 2016 — Tulliallan Burlington v EUIPO — Burlington Fashion (Burlington)

CELEX number:
62016TN0122
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
22/03/2016
Number of pages:
2

Case T-106/16: Action brought on 17 March 2016 — zero v EUIPO — Hemming (ZIRO)

CELEX number:
62016TN0106
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
17/03/2016
Number of pages:
1

Case T-120/16: Action brought on 22 March 2016 — Tulliallan Burlington v EUIPO — Burlington Fashion (Burlington)

CELEX number:
62016TN0120
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
22/03/2016
Number of pages:
2

Case T-104/16: Action brought on 16 March 2016 — Puma v EUIPO (FOREVER FASTER)

CELEX number:
62016TN0104
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
16/03/2016
Number of pages:
1

Case C-31/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 18 January 2016 — Visser Vastgoed Beleggingen BV v Raad van de gemeente Appingedam

CELEX number:
62016CN0031
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
18/01/2016
Number of pages:
2

Case T-85/16: Action brought on 17 February 2016 — Shoe Branding Europe v EUIPO — adidas (Position of two parallel stripes on a shoe)

CELEX number:
62016TN0085
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
17/02/2016
Number of pages:
2

Case T-692/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — Puma v OHIM — Sinda Poland (Representation of an animal) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative mark representing an animal — Earlier international figurative marks representing a puma — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

CELEX number:
62014TA0692
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
25/02/2016
Number of pages:
1

Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom, Finanzgericht München — Germany) — C & J Clark International Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (C-659/13), Puma SE v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg (C-34/14) (References for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Validity of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 — WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7) — Determination of dumping — Imports from non market economy countries — Claims for market economy treatment — Time limit — Article 9(5) and (6) — Claims for individual treatment — Article 17 — Sampling — Article 3(1), (5) and (6), Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) — Cooperation of the Union industry — Article 3(2) and (7) — Determination of injury — Other known factors — Community Customs Code — Article 236(1) and (2) — Repayment of duties not legally owed — Time limit — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Invalidity of a regulation which imposed anti-dumping duties)

CELEX number:
62013CA0659
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
04/02/2016
Number of pages:
2

Case T-9/16: Action brought on 11 January 2016 — Skechers USA France v OHIM — IM Production (Shoes)

CELEX number:
62016TN0009
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
11/01/2016
Number of pages:
2
Sort by
5
Domain: All, EUROVOC descriptor: footwear industry, Form: Judicial information, Date of document: 2016, Search language: English