Search Results

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 13 June 2018.
X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, sitting in Amsterdam.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection made in one of the Member States by a third-country national — Articles 17, 18, 23 and 24 — Prior international protection procedure ongoing in one Member State — New application in another Member State — Take back request not made within the prescribed periods — Surrender of the person concerned for criminal prosecution.
Case C-213/17.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:434

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Staff Working Document on the Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in 2017 Accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2017 Report on the Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

SWD/2018/304 final

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EC) No 767/2008, Regulation (EC) No 810/2009, Regulation (EU) 2017/2226, Regulation (EU) 2016/399, Regulation XX/2018 [Interoperability Regulation], and Decision 2004/512/EC and repealing Council Decision 2008/633/JHA

COM/2018/302 final

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 May 2018.
AY.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Županijski Sud u Zagrebu.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(2), Article 3(2) and Article 4(3) — Grounds for the refusal to execute — Closure of criminal proceedings — Principle ne bis in idem — Requested person who had the status of a witness in previous proceedings concerning the same acts — Issue of several European arrest warrants against the same person.
Case C-268/17.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:317

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters and Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering evidence in criminal proceedings

SWD/2018/118 final

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 April 2018.
Romano Pisciotti v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Articles 18 and 21 TFEU — Extradition to the United States of America of a national of a Member State who has exercised his right to freedom of movement — Extradition agreement between the European Union and that third State — Scope of EU law — Prohibition on extradition applied only to own nationals — Restriction on free movement — Justification based on the prevention of impunity — Proportionality — Informing the Union citizen’s Member State of origin.
Case C-191/16.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:222

Case C-367/16: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Dawid Piotrowski (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Surrender procedures between Member States — Grounds for mandatory non-execution — Article 3(3) — Minors — Requirement to verify the minimum age at which a minor may be regarded as criminally responsible or assessment, in each individual case, of the additional conditions laid down by the law of the executing Member State in order specifically to prosecute or convict a minor)

OJ C 104, 19.3.2018, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 104, 19.3.2018, p. 7–7

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 6 February 2018.
Criminal proceedings against Dániel Bertold Lada.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Törvényszék.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Taking account in new criminal proceedings of a previous conviction in another Member State — Special procedure for recognition of a conviction in another Member State — Review and legal reclassification of the earlier decision — Principle of mutual recognition — Article 82(1) TFEU.
Case C-390/16.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:65

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 January 2018.
Dawid Piotrowski.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Surrender procedures between Member States — Grounds for mandatory non-execution — Article 3(3) — Minors — Requirement to verify the minimum age at which a minor may be regarded as criminally responsible or assessment, in each individual case, of the additional conditions laid down by the law of the executing Member State in order specifically to prosecute or convict a minor.
Case C-367/16.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:27

View of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 August 2008.
Ignacio Pedro Santesteban Goicoechea.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour d'appel de Montpellier - France.
Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Articles 31 and 32 - European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States - Possibility for the State executing an extradition request to apply a convention adopted before 1 January 2004 but applicable in that State from a later date.
Case C-296/08 PPU.

European Court Reports 2008 I-06307

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2008:455