Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Search results

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Search Results

New directory of case-law

Document sector: 6, Case Law directory code (new), 1st level: EEC/EC - General and final provisions * General and final provisions
2

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2017.
Pier Antonio Panzeri v European Parliament.
Case T-166/16.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2017:347

CELEX number:
62016TJ0166
Form:
Judgment
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
18/05/2017

Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 16 May 2017.
Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.
Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.
Opinion 2/15.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2017:376

CELEX number:
62015CV0002(01)
Form:
Opinion of the Court
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
16/05/2017
2