Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Search results

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Search Results

2
Clear selection
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2011.
Danske Svineproducenter v Justitsministeriet.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Vestre Landsret - Denmark.
Second paragraph of Article 288 TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 - Protection of animals during transport - Transport by road of domestic animals of the porcine species - Minimum height of compartments - Inspection during a journey - Loading density - Right of Member States to adopt detailed standards.
Case C-316/10.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:863

CELEX number:
62010CJ0316
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
21/12/2011

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 10 September 2015.
Pfotenhilfe-Ungarn e.V. v Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Article 1(5) — Protection of animals during transport — Transport of stray dogs from one Member State to another by an animal protection association — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Directive 90/425/EEC — Article 12 — Concept of ‘dealers engaging in intra-Community trade’.
Case C-301/14.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:589

CELEX number:
62014CC0301
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
10/09/2015

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.
QY v Finanzamt Österreich.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 45 and 48 TFEU – Free movement of workers – Equal treatment – Family benefits provided to development aid workers who take their family members to the third country to which they have been posted – Withdrawal – Second paragraph of Article 288 TFEU – Legal acts of the Union – Application of regulations – National legislation the scope ratione personae of which is broader than that of a regulation – Conditions – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11(3)(a) and (e) – Scope – Employed person who is a national of one Member State, employed as development aid worker by an employer established in another Member State and posted to a third country – Article 68(3) – Right of an applicant for family benefits to lodge a single application with the institution of the Member State having primary competence or with the institution of the Member State having secondary competence.
Case C-372/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:962

CELEX number:
62020CJ0372
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
25/11/2021

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 April 2018.
European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 — Article 2(6) — Article 8 — Cabotage operations — Definition — Definition contained in a ‘Questions and answers’ document drawn up by the European Commission — Legal force — National implementing measures limiting the number of loading points and unloading points which may be part of the same cabotage operation — Discretion — Restriction — Proportionality.
Case C-541/16.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:251

CELEX number:
62016CJ0541
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
12/04/2018

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2015.
Pfotenhilfe-Ungarn e.V. v Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Article 1(5) — Protection of animals during transport — Transport of stray dogs from one Member State to another by an animal protection association — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Directive 90/425/EEC — Article 12 — Concept of ‘dealers engaging in intra-Community trade’.
Case C-301/14.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:793

CELEX number:
62014CJ0301
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
03/12/2015

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) 16 October 2014.
Welmory sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Gdańsku.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 44 — Concept of ‘fixed establishment’ of the recipient of a supply of services — Place where services are deemed to be supplied to taxable persons — Intra-Community transaction.
Case C‑605/12.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2014:2298

CELEX number:
62012CJ0605
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
16/10/2014

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 23 November 2017.
European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 — Article 2(6) — Article 8 — Cabotage operations — Definition — Definition contained in a ‘Questions and answers’ document drawn up by the European Commission — Legal force — National implementing measures limiting the number of loading points and unloading points which may be part of the same cabotage operation — Discretion — Restriction — Proportionality.
Case C-541/16.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2017:894

CELEX number:
62016CC0541
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
23/11/2017

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 1 April 2014.
Fonnship A/S v Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet and Facket för Service och Kommunikation (SEKO) and Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet v Fonnship A/S.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbetsdomstolen.
Maritime transport — Freedom to provide services — Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 — Applicability to transport carried out from or to States that are parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) using vessels flying the flag of a third country — Industrial action taken in the ports of such a State in favour of third country nationals employed on those vessels — Nationality of those workers and vessels having no bearing on the applicability of EU law.
Case C‑83/13.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2014:201

CELEX number:
62013CC0083
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
01/04/2014

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 December 2021.
Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 80 – Representation of the data subjects by a not-for-profit association – Representative action brought by a consumer protection association in the absence of a mandate and independently of the infringement of specific rights of a data subject – Action based on the prohibition of unfair commercial practices, the infringement of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions.
Case C-319/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:979

CELEX number:
62020CC0319
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
02/12/2021

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 27 June 2019.
Minoo Schuch-Ghannadan v Medizinische Universität Wien.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework Agreement on part-time work – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Less favourable treatment of part-time workers compared to full-time workers as regards their conditions of employment – Prohibition – National legislation fixing a maximum duration of fixed-term employment that is longer for part-time workers than for full-time workers – Principle of pro rata temporis – Directive 2006/54/EC – Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation – Article 2(1)(b) – Concept of ‘indirect discrimination’ on grounds of sex – Article 14(1)(c) – Employment and working conditions – Article 19 – Burden of proof.
Case C-274/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:547

CELEX number:
62018CC0274
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
27/06/2019
2
Clear selection
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all