EUR-Lex Search results
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Search Results
Case T-31/19: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — AF v FRA (Action for annulment and damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 — Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ — 2014 Staff Regulations — No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above — 2017 reclassification exercise — Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
- CELEX number:
- 62019TB0031
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 26/03/2020
- Number of pages:
- 2
Case T-646/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2018 — Simpson v Council (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Upgrade — Classification in grade — Decision not to award the applicant grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition — Dismissal of the action at first instance after referral back by the General Court — Composition of the panel of judges which adopted the order at first instance — Procedure for appointment of a judge to the Civil Service Tribunal — Tribunal established by law — Principle of the right to a judge assigned by law)
- CELEX number:
- 62016TA0646
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 19/07/2018
- Number of pages:
- 1
Case T-130/14: Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2015 — Council v Simpson (Appeals — Civil service — Officials — Advancement in grade — Classification in grade — Decision not to award the person concerned grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition — Distortion of the evidence)
- CELEX number:
- 62014TA0130
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 22/10/2015
- Number of pages:
- 2
Case F-112/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — EJ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Reform of the Staff Regulations — Regulation No 1023/2013 — Types of posts — Transitional rules concerning assignment to types of posts — Article 30(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Lawyer administrators in grade AD 13 of the Commission’s Legal Service — Situation of ‘legal advisers’ and ‘members of the Legal Service’ — Methods of accessing grade AD 13 under the 2004 Staff Regulations — Promotion under Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Appointment pursuant to Article 29 of the Staff Regulations — Assignment to the types of posts ‘Adviser or equivalent’ and ‘Administrator in transition’ — Act adversely affecting an official — Concept of ‘significant responsibilities’ — Concept of ‘special responsibilities’ — Equal treatment — Opportunity for promotion to grade AD 14 — Legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty)
- CELEX number:
- 62014FA0112
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Date of document:
- 16/07/2015
- Number of pages:
- 1
Case F-20/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — FG v European Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Reform of the Staff Regulations — Regulation No 1023/2013 — Types of posts — Transitional rules on grading in the types of posts — Article 30(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Suitability for promotion to the grade above — Promotion year 2014 — Administrator without ‘particular responsibilities’ — Promotion possibilities capped at grade AD 12 — Name of that administrator not included in the list of promotable officials in grade AD 12 — Possibility of requesting to benefit under Article 30(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Deadline of 31 December 2015 — Admissibility of the action — Concept of measure adversely affecting a person — Amendment of the digital personal file of the official — Administrative information — Published on the institution’s intranet — Failure to satisfy the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
- CELEX number:
- 62015FB0020
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Date of document:
- 16/07/2015
- Number of pages:
- 2
Case F-11/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Dupré v EEAS (Civil service — Staff of the EEAS — Member of the temporary staff — Article 98 of the Staff Regulations — Article 2(e) of the CEOS — Contract of employment — Grading — Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice — Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to AD 14 — Principle of correspondence between the grade and the post — Judgment by default)
- CELEX number:
- 62014FA0011
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Date of document:
- 18/05/2015
- Number of pages:
- 2
Joined Cases F-72/12 and F-10/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 November 2013 — Roulet v Commission (Civil Service — Remuneration — Article 66 of the Staff Regulations — Former member of the temporary staff at Grade AD12 — Recruitment as an official at Grade AD6 — Payment of remuneration equivalent to that paid to an official at Grade AD12 — Manifest error — Recovery of undue payments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations)
- CELEX number:
- 62012FA0072
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Date of document:
- 21/11/2013
- Number of pages:
- 1
Case F-107/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Toth v Commission (Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — Classification in grade — Grades laid down in the call for applications — Amendment of the rules governing classification of members of the temporary staff after publication of the call for applications — Classification in grade under the new, less favourable rules — Transitional provisions — Application by analogy — Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Proportionality — Principle of good administration)
- CELEX number:
- 62005FA0107
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Date of document:
- 30/09/2010
- Number of pages:
- 1
Case F-131/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2016 — Stips v Commission (Civil Service — Member of the temporary staff paid from research and investment appropriations — Article 2(d) CEOS — Contract of indefinite duration — Reclassification in the higher grade — 2013 reclassification round — Closure of the round after 1 January 2014 — Entry into force of Regulation No 1023/2013 — Methods of accessing grade AD 13 — Application, by analogy, of Article 45(1) and of point 1 of Section A of Annex I of the Staff Regulations — Refusal to reclassify an AD 12 member of the temporary staff — Suitability for reclassification — Principles of legal certainty and non-retroactivity — Right to good administration)
- CELEX number:
- 62015FA0131
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Date of document:
- 19/07/2016
- Number of pages:
- 2
Case F-102/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 January 2014 — Van Asbroeck v Parliament (Civil service — Classification in grade — Applicants placed on the reserve list of a competition to change category following the entry into force of the 2004 Staff Regulations — Compensatory allowance — Decision to re-grade officials benefitting from that compensatory allowance)
- CELEX number:
- 62012FA0102
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Date of document:
- 21/01/2014
- Number of pages:
- 1
Search for: Grade, Search language: English, Form: Judicial information