Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Search results

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Search Results

Sort by
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 September 2018.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:768

CELEX number:
62017CC0349
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
25/09/2018

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2019.
Eesti Pagar AS v Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus and Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 (General block exemption regulation) — Article 8(2) — Aid with an incentive effect — Concept of ‘start of work on the project’ — Powers of the national authorities — Unlawful aid — No decision of the European Commission or of a national court — Obligation on the national authorities to recover unlawful aid on their own initiative — Legal basis — Article 108(3) TFEU — General principle of EU law of protection of legitimate expectations — Decision of the competent national authority granting aid under Regulation No 800/2008 — Knowledge of circumstances excluding the eligibility of the aid application — Creation of a legitimate expectation — None — Limitation — Aid co-financed from a structural fund — Applicable legislation — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — National legislation — Interest — Obligation to claim interest — Legal basis — Article 108(3) TFEU — Applicable legislation — National rules — Principle of effectiveness.
Case C-349/17.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:172

CELEX number:
62017CJ0349
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
05/03/2019

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 September 2001.
Asia Motor France SA, André-François Bach and Monin automobiles SA v Commission of the European Communities.
Competition - Decision rejecting complaints - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-1/01 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2001:483

CELEX number:
62001CO0001
Form:
Order
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
20/09/2001

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 1998.
Somaco SARL v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeals - Competition - No anti-competitive conduct in Martinique by reason of irresistible pressure on the part of the local administration - Distortion of evidence.
Case C-401/96 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1998:208

CELEX number:
61996CJ0401
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
07/05/1998

Judgment of the Court of 7 June 1983.
SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities.
Competition - Parallel importsof hi-fi equipment.
Joined cases 100 to 103/80.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1983:158

CELEX number:
61980CJ0100
Form:
Judgment
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
07/06/1983

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Capotorti delivered on 16 February 1982.
Rezguia Adoui v Belgian State and City of Liège; Dominique Cornuaille v Belgian State.
References for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgium.
Public policy - Right of residence or establishment.
Joined cases 115 and 116/81.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1982:60

CELEX number:
61981CC0115
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
16/02/1982

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 22 November 2022.
Telefónica de España, SA v European Commission.
Appeal – Interim relief – Public procurement – Tender procedure – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Urgency – Criteria for assessing the condition relating to urgency – Pre-contractual period – Standstill period.
Cases C-478/22 P(R).

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:914

CELEX number:
62022CO0478(03)
Form:
Order
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
22/11/2022

Case C-801/23, Volkswagen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Duisburg (Germany) lodged on 29 December 2023 – YK v Volkswagen AG

CELEX number:
62023CN0801
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
29/12/2023

Case C-751/23, Mercedes-Benz Group: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Duisburg (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2023 – FD v Mercedes-Benz Group AG

CELEX number:
62023CN0751
Form:
Judicial information
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
07/12/2023

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 4 October 2018.
Proceedings brought by Heinrich Weiss and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverfassungsgericht.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Economic and monetary policy –– Decision (EU) 2015/774 of the European Central Bank — Validity — Secondary markets public sector asset purchase programme — Articles 119 and 127 TFEU — Powers of the ECB and the European System of Central Banks — Maintenance of price stability — Proportionality — Article 123 TFEU — Prohibition of monetary financing of Member States in the euro area.
Case C-493/17.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:815

CELEX number:
62017CC0493
Form:
Opinion of the Advocate General
Author:
Court of Justice
Date of document:
04/10/2018
Sort by
2
Clear selection
Customise shown information
Export selection Export all
Search for: EAS, Search language: English, Author: Court of Justice