Search Results

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 May 2017.
Les Éclaires GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark L’ECLAIREUR — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(1), Article 51(1)(a) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rule 22(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Alleged divergence from Part C, Section 6, of the EUIPO Guidelines for examination.
Case T-680/15.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2017:320

Case C-131/23, Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Judeţul Braşov: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov — Romania) — Criminal proceedings against C.A.A. and C.V. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Acte éclairé — Decision 2006/928/EC — Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption — Legal nature and effects — Binding on Romania — Direct effect of the benchmarks — Obligation to combat corruption in general and high-level corruption in particular — Obligation to provide for dissuasive and effective criminal penalties — Limitation period for criminal liability — Decision of a constitutional court which has declared invalid a provision of national legislation governing the grounds for interrupting that period — Systemic risk of impunity — Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law — Requirements of foreseeability and precision of criminal law — Principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior) — Principle of legal certainty — National standard of protection of fundamental rights — Obligation of the courts of a Member State to disapply decisions of the constitutional court and/or the supreme court of that Member State in the event that they are incompatible with EU law)

OJ C, C/2024/2001, 18.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2001/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C, C/2024/2001, 18.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2001/oj

Case C-75/23, Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Braşov: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov — Romania) — Criminal proceedings against M.A.sr, S.A.C.S., S.A.S. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Acte éclairé — Identical questions — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Article 325(1) TFEU — PFI Convention — Article 2(1) — Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union by taking effective deterrent measures — Obligation to provide for criminal penalties — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Serious VAT fraud — Limitation period for criminal liability — Judgment of a constitutional court which had invalidated a national provision governing the reasons for interrupting that period — Systemic risk of impunity — Protection of fundamental rights — Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law — Requirements of foreseeability and precision of criminal law — Principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior) — Principle of legal certainty — National standard of protection of fundamental rights — Duty on the courts of a Member State to disapply judgments of the constitutional court and/or the supreme court of that Member State in the event that they are incompatible with EU law — Disciplinary liability of judges in the event of non-compliance with those judgments — Principle of the primacy of EU law)

OJ C, C/2024/2000, 18.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2000/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C, C/2024/2000, 18.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2000/oj

Case T-680/15: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2017 — Les Éclaires GmbH v EUIPO — L’éclaireur International (L’ECLAIREUR) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark L’ECLAIREUR — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(1), Article 51(1)(a) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rule 22(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Alleged divergence from Part C, Section 6, of the EUIPO Guidelines for examination)

OJ C 202, 26.6.2017, p. 17–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 202, 26.6.2017, p. 17–17

Case T-680/15: Action brought on 20 November 2015 — Les Éclaires v OHIM — L’éclaireur International (L’ECLAIREUR)

OJ C 38, 1.2.2016, p. 66–67 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 38, 1.2.2016, p. 66–67

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2024.
European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Default procedure – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Article 127(1) – Transition period – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom – Enforcement of an arbitral award granting the payment of compensation – Decision of the European Commission declaring that that payment constitutes State aid which is incompatible with the internal market – Article 4(3) TEU – Sincere cooperation – Obligation to stay proceedings – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – International agreement between Member States and third countries concluded before the date of their accession to the European Union – Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention) – Application of EU law – Article 267 TFEU – National court or tribunal adjudicating at last instance – Obligation to make a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling – Article 108(3) TFEU – Suspension of implementation of the aid.
Case C-516/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:231

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.
JMS Sports sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a spiral hair elastic – Disclosure of the earlier designs – Disclosure on the internet – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Equality of arms – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.
Case T-823/19.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:718

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.
Viesgo Infraestructuras Energéticas SL v Administración General del Estado and Others.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common rules for the internal market in electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 3(2) and (6) – Imposition of public service obligations – Financing of a regulated discount for the purpose of the protection of vulnerable consumers – Requirements of transparency and non-discrimination.
Case C-683/19.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:847

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2020.
Forbo Financial Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Canoleum – Earlier international word mark MARMOLEUM – Relative ground for refusal – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Application for restitutio in integrum – Sudden illness of the lawyer representing the applicant – Requirement to exercise due care – Evidential value of the solemnly affirmed statement made by the lawyer.
Case T-3/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:606

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 October 2018.
Feniks Sp. z o.o. v Azteca Products & Services SL.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Special jurisdiction — Article 7(1)(a) — Concept of ‘matters relating to a contract’ — Actio pauliana.
Case C-337/17.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:805