Search Results

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2023.
KHG GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Case T-608/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:797

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 November 2023.
Tradias GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Tradias – Earlier EU word mark TRIODOS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-32/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:740

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2023.
DDR Kultur UG (haftungsbeschränkt) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE PLANET – Earlier EU figurative mark PLANÈTE + – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-47/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:311

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.
Sport1 GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 – Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Interdependence between factors.
Case T-141/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:55

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 October 2022.
bett1.de GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BODY STAR – Earlier EU word mark Bodyguard – Earlier national word mark Bodyguard – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-537/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:596

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.
Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CMS Italy – Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding towards the left and earlier international figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Similarity of the signs – Proof of reputation – Overall assessment.
Case T-711/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:604

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 October 2022.
bett1.de GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Body-Star – Earlier EU word mark Bodyguard – Relative ground for refusal – Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of that regulation.
Case T-599/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:598

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.
Ancor Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – EU word mark CODE-X – Earlier national word and figurative marks Cody’s – Earlier international figurative mark Cody’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-198/21.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:83

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.
European Federation of Financial Analysts' Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-369/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:921

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.
Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national and international word marks ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-436/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:699