EUR-Lex Search results

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Search Results

Sort by

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 April 2024.
Adeva v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Case T-313/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:270

CELEX number:
62023TJ0313
Form:
Judgment
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
24/04/2024

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 February 2024.
L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Case T-180/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:103

CELEX number:
62023TJ0180
Form:
Judgment
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
21/02/2024

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 February 2024.
Azalee Cosmetics v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Case T-765/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:106

CELEX number:
62022TJ0765
Form:
Judgment
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
21/02/2024

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 January 2024.
Feed SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Case T-26/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:48

CELEX number:
62023TJ0026
Form:
Judgment
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
31/01/2024

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 December 2023.
Pierre Balmain v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Case T-564/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:851

CELEX number:
62022TJ0564
Form:
Judgment
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
20/12/2023

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 October 2023.
Flowbird v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Case T-296/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:613

CELEX number:
62022TJ0296
Form:
Judgment
Author:
General Court
Date of document:
11/10/2023
Sort by
2
Domain: All, Subdomain: Case-law, Case-Law directory code (new), 1st level: Internal policy of the European Union, Case-Law directory code (new), 4th level: Relative grounds for refusal, Country or organisation from which the request originates: France, Search language: English, Include case-law summaries: True