Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 20 November 2019.
Retail Royalty Co. v Fashion Energy Srl.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-678/19 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:994

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2019.
Apple Inc. v Pear Technologies.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘pear’ — Earlier figurative mark depicting an apple — Relative ground for refusal — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(5) — No similarity between the signs at issue — Appeal manifestly unfounded).
Case C-295/19 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:805

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 December 2018.
Classic Media AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU Trade Mark — Opposition Proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CLASSIC DRIVER — Earlier EU word mark DRIVER — Relative Ground for Refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-811/17.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:894

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 September 2018.
Moscow Confectionery Factory "Krasnyiy oktyabr" OAO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of a mark representing a crayfish.
Case C-248/18 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2018:699

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 May 2018.
Siberian Vodka AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark DIAMOND ICE — Earlier EU word mark DIAMOND CUT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-234/17.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:259

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 December 2016.
Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark MITOCHRON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b).
Case C-401/16 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2016:923

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 December 2016.
Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark MITOCHRON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b).
Case C-402/16 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2016:924

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 June 2015.
The Sunrider Corporation v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Appeal - Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of word mark SUN FRESH - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier Community word mark SUNNY FRESH - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods covered by the marks at issue - Right to be heard - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 8(1)(b), 75 and 76.
Case C-142/14 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:371

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2015.
Jyoti Ceramic Industries PVT. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Case C-420/14 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2015:70

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2014.
Industrias Alen SA de CV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CLORALEX - Earlier national word mark CLOROX - Likelihood of confusion - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Cross-appeal - Article 176 of the Rules of Procedure - Requirement to introduce the cross-appeal by a separate document.
Case C-422/12 P.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general)

Digital reports

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2014:57