Search Results

Case T-79/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2019 — Bekat v EUIPO — Borbet (ARBET) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative EU mark ARBET — Prior national word mark BORBET — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

OJ C 103, 18.3.2019, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 103, 18.3.2019, p. 38–38

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 December 2025.
Cin Valentine, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VAL --- ACRYL – Earlier EU word mark Malacryl – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-518/24.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2025:1097

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 April 2023.
Volkswagen AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark XTG – Earlier EU word mark GTX – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-154/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:218

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 April 2023.
Volkswagen AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark XTG – Earlier EU word mark GTX – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-153/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:217

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.
Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-644/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:817

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.
Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-642/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:819

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.
Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-643/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:818

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.
Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-168/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:605

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 December 2024.
Jula AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Mula – Earlier EU word mark Jula – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Visual and phonetic similarity.
Case T-22/24.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:875

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 February 2024.
Azalee Cosmetics v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LA CRÈME LIBRE – Earlier EU word mark LIBRE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-765/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:106