Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2021.
Slovak Telekom a.s. v Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Division of competences between the European Commission and the national competition authorities – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 11(6) – National competition authorities relieved of their competence – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Case C-857/19.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Digital reports

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:139

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.
Raiffeisen Bank lnternational AG (Spółka Akcyjna) v UI and MB.
Request for a preliminary ruling from Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku.
Case C-329/20.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:111

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2021.
Qualcomm, Inc. and Qualcomm Europe, Inc. v European Commission.
Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for UMTS-compliant baseband chipsets – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 18(3) – Decision to request information – Necessity of the information requested – Proportionality – Burden of proof – Self-incrimination.
Case C-466/19 P.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Digital reports

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:76

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 January 2021.
Consiliul Concurenţei v Whiteland Import Export SRL.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Penalties imposed by the national competition authority – Limitation period – Actions interrupting the limitation period – National legislation precluding, after the initiation of an investigation, the possibility that subsequent action for the purpose of proceedings or investigation may interrupt the new limitation period – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25(3) – Scope – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness.
Case C-308/19.

Digital reports (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Digital reports

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:47

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2020.
Fakro sp z o.o. v European Commission.
Case T-515/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:620

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 November 2020.
Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission.
Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rail freight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU – Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company – Removal of a section of railway track – Concept of ‘abuse’ – Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor – Calculation of the amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines – Remedies – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.
Case T-814/17.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:545

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020.
ZA and Others v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 2 de Madrid.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Competition – Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restricting competition – Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and found – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-716/19.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:870

Summary of Commission Decision of 20 March 2019 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40411 – Google Search (AdSense)) (notified under document number C(2019) 2173) (Only the English text is authentic) 2020/C 369/04

C/2019/2173

OJ C 369, 3.11.2020, p. 6–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 369, 3.11.2020, p. 6–10

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 19 March 2019 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40411 Google Search (AdSense) Rapporteur: Croatia 2020/C 369/02

C/2019/2173

OJ C 369, 3.11.2020, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 369, 3.11.2020, p. 2–2

Final Report of the Hearing Officer (Pursuant to Articles 16 and 17 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 275, 20.10.2011, p. 29) (‘Decision 2011/695/EU’).) Google Search (AdSense) (AT.40411) 2020/C 369/03

C/2019/2173

OJ C 369, 3.11.2020, p. 3–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 369, 3.11.2020, p. 3–5