Search Results

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 July 2006.
Eurodomus srl v Comune di Bolzano.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunale civile di Bolzano - Italy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-166/06.

European Court Reports 2006 I-00090*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2006:485

European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2016 on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2015 (2016/2009(INI))

OJ C 238, 6.7.2018, pp. 2–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 238, 6.7.2018, pp. 2–27

European Parliament resolution of 10 June 2015 on the situation in Hungary (2015/2700(RSP))

OJ C 407, 4.11.2016, pp. 46–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

OJ C 407, 4.11.2016, pp. 46–49

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2025.
I.G. and D.L.
Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judge of the Civil Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Judge appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on the basis of a resolution of the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) in its new composition – Reference for a preliminary ruling from a formation of the court which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.
Joined Cases C-586/24 and C-605/24.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2025:206

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.
'Vivacom Bulgaria' EAD v Varhoven administrativen sad and Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Liability of a Member State for damage caused to individuals by an infringement of EU law – Infringement by a national court adjudicating at last instance in relation to value added tax (VAT) – Jurisdiction of a court adjudicating at last instance while having the capacity of defendant in the dispute – Composition of the adjudicating panel.
Case C-369/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:1043

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2024.
KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or its development – Obligation for the national supreme court to consider, in proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law, whether a reference for a preliminary ruling should be made – Statement of reasons for the decision refusing leave to appeal on a point of law.
Case C-144/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:881

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.
LM v Direktor na Oblastna direktsia na MVR - Veliko Tarnovo.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-122/24.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:782

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2024.
Wiener Linien GmbH & Co KG v SwiftSuit Legal Tech GmbH.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Article 2(2)(b) – Prohibition of indirect discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin – Public transport travel cards available to students, the price of which depends on their place of residence – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-65/24.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:728

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 April 2024.
Criminal proceedings against IC.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Intellectual property – Act adversely affecting intellectual property rights – Criminal and administrative penalties – Principle of legality of criminal offences and penalties.
Case C-558/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2024:283

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.
NK v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Feldkirch.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Vorarlberg.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Final termination of a first set of proceedings brought for an infringement of a provision of national legislation on games of chance – Administrative penalty of a criminal nature imposed for the same acts for an infringement of a different provision of that legislation – First set of proceedings terminated on account of an incorrect legal classification of the offence committed.
Case C-55/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:670