Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62006TJ0302

    Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2008.
    Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark ‘E’ - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Error of law - Lack of real assessment - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
    Case T-302/06.

    European Court Reports 2008 II-00132*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2008:267





    Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2008 – Hartmann v OHIM (E)

    (Case T-302/06)

    Community trade mark – Application for the Community word mark ‘E’ – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Error of law – Lack of real assessment – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

    1.                     Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Signs capable of constituting a mark – Letters and numbers (Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 4 and 7(1)(b)) (see paras 29-31)

    2.                     Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b) and (3)) (see paras 32-35)

    Re:

    ACTION against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 September 2006 (Case R 805/2006-4) concerning an application for registration of the word mark ‘E’ as a Community trade mark.

    Information relating to the case

    Applicant for the Community trade mark:

    Paul Hartmann AG

    Community trade mark sought:

    Word mark E for goods in Classes 5, 10 and 25 – Application No 4316949

    Decision of the examiner:

    Registration refused

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Appeal dismissed


    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 5 September 2006 (Case R 805/2006-4);

    2.

    Orders OHIM to pay its own costs as well as those of Paul Hartmann AG.

    Top