Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TJ0358

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2018.
    Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak v Council of the European Union.
    Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds — Objectives — Criteria for inclusion of persons targeted — Maintenance of the applicant’s designation on the list of persons targeted — Factual basis — Plea of illegality — Legal basis — Proportionality — Right to a fair trial — Presumption of innocence — Principle of good administration — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection.
    Case T-358/17.

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2018 –
    Mubarak v Council

    (Case T‑358/17)

    (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds — Objectives — Criteria for inclusion of persons targeted — Maintenance of the applicant’s designation on the list of persons targeted — Factual basis — Plea of illegality — Legal basis — Proportionality — Right to a fair trial — Presumption of innocence — Principle of good administration — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection)

    1. 

    European Union — Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds of persons involved in the misappropriation of public funds and of natural or legal persons, bodies or organisations associated with them — Ambit of the review — Restricted review for general rules — Review extending to the assessment of facts and verification of evidence for measures applying to specific entities — Maintenance of the applicant’s designation on the list of persons targeted — Obligation on the part of the Council to undertake further checks — Scope

    (Council Decisions (CFSP) 2017/496 and (CFSP) 2018/466; Council Regulations 2017/491 and 2018/465)

    (see paras 40, 41, 102)

    2. 

    Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt — Decision to freeze funds — Adoption or retention on the basis of a national fund-freezing decision of an authority of a third State — Whether permissible — Condition — National decision adopted in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Council’s verification obligation — Obligation to state reasons — Scope

    (Council Decisions 2011/172/CFSP, (CFSP) 2017/496 and (CFSP) 2018/466; Council Regulations 2017/491 and 2018/465)

    (see paras 64, 65, 70, 72-74, 78)

    3. 

    Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds of persons involved in the misappropriation of public funds and of natural or legal persons, bodies or organisations associated with them — Misappropriation of public funds — Concept — Independent and uniform interpretation — Broad interpretation — Actions capable of being characterised in terms of Egyptian criminal law as misappropriation of State funds — Included

    (Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP, Art. 1(1); Council Regulation No 270/2011, Art. 2(1))

    (see paras 101, 103, 104, 111, 112, 116)

    4. 

    EU law — Principles — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt — Decision maintaining the applicant’s designation on the list of persons targeted — Obligation to disclose individual and specific grounds for the decisions adopted — Obligation to enable the person concerned effectively to put forward his point of view on the grounds held against him — Scope

    (Council Decisions 2011/172/CFSP, (CFSP) 2017/496 and (CFSP) 2018/466; Council Regulations No 270/2011, 2017/491 and 2018/465)

    (see paras 151-153, 158)

    5. 

    Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds of persons involved in the misappropriation of public funds and of natural or legal persons, bodies or organisations associated with them — Restriction on the right to property and reputation — Breach of principle of proportionality — None

    (Council Decisions 2011/172/CFSP, (CFSP) 2017/496 and (CFSP) 2018/466; Council Regulations No 270/2011, 2017/491 and 2018/465)

    (see paras 166, 177-181, 182)

    Re:

    Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment (i) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/496 of 21 March 2017 amending Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2017 L 76, p. 22); (ii) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/491 of 21 March 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2017 L 76, p. 10); (iii) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/466 of 21 March 2018 amending Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2018 L 78I, p. 3); and (iv) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/465 of 21 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2018 L 78I, p. 1), in so far as those acts apply to the applicant.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Mr Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

    Top