Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TJ0278

    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023.
    Atlas Copco Airpower and Others v European Commission.
    State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery.
    Cases T-278/16 and T-370/16.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:568

     Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023 – Atlas Copco Airpower and Others v Commission

    (Cases T‑278/16 and T‑370/16) ( 1 )

    (State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Recovery)

    1. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Tax measures – Tax ruling – Reference framework for determining the existence of an advantage and of its selective nature – Taking only national law into account – Administrative practice that is contrary to the applicable legislation not included in the reference framework – Whether permissible

    (Art. 107(1) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 24-80)

    2. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Tax measures – Joint examination of the conditions of selectivity and economic advantage – Whether permissible

    (Art. 107(1) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 82-84, 91-93)

    3. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Grant of an advantage to the beneficiaries – Measure conferring a tax advantage – Tax ruling – Tax exemption resulting from an administrative practice that is contrary to the applicable legislation – Tax exemption leading to a lower tax burden than would arise under the normal rules of taxation – Included

    (Art. 107(1) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 94-103)

    4. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Selective nature of the measure – Derogation from the general tax system – Differentiation between undertakings in a comparable factual and legal situation – Criteria for assessment – Comparison in the light of the objective pursued by the common tax regime as a whole

    (Art. 107(1) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 109-157)

    5. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Concept – Selective nature of the measure – Derogation from the general tax system – Justification derived from the nature and general scheme of the system – Tax exemption not addressing situations of double taxation in a necessary and proportionate manner – No justification

    (Art. 107(1) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 162-169)

    6. 

    Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Commission decision on State aid – Decision finding aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Decision including information enabling the addressee of the decision to determine the amount to be recovered and the beneficiaries who are required to repay the aid – Sufficient statement of reasons

    (Arts 108 and 296 TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 16)

    (see paragraphs 180-182)

    7. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in the form of a tax exemption – Reductions in the tax burden of national entities forming part of multinational groups – Identification of the national entities and the multinational groups as beneficiaries of the aid – No manifest error of assessment – Recovery ordered from the multinational groups concerned – No breach of the principles of legal certainty and legality

    (Arts 107(1) and 108(2) TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 16)

    (see paragraphs 186-200)

    8. 

    Aid granted by a Member State – Administrative procedure – Obligations of the Commission – Diligent and impartial examination – Account taken of the most complete and reliable information possible – Scope of the obligation – Principle of sound administration – Breach – None

    (Art. 108(2) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 206-212)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Orders that Cases T‑278/16 and T‑370/16 be joined for the purposes of the present judgment;

    2. 

    Dismisses the actions;

    3. 

    Orders Atlas Copco Airpower and Atlas Copco AB to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in Case T‑278/16;

    4. 

    Orders Anheuser‑Busch Inbev and Ampar to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T‑370/16.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

    Top