Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TJ0280

    Ewald v OHMI - Kin Cosmetics (Keen)

    Keywords
    Subject of the case
    Operative part

    Keywords

    Community trade mark 

    Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark 

    Relative grounds for refusal 

    Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services 

    Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 17, 37

    )

    Subject of the case

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2011 (Case R 1383/2010‑1), relating to opposition proceedings between Kin Cosmetics, SA and Ms Rita Ewald.

    Operative part

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. Dismisses the action;

    2. Orders Ms Rita Ewald to pay the costs.

    Top

    Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 May 2012 — Ewald v OHIM — Kin Cosmetics (Keen)

    (Case T-280/11)

    ‛Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Keen — Community figurative mark KIN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009’

    Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 17, 37)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2011 (Case R 1383/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Kin Cosmetics, SA and Ms Rita Ewald.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Ms Rita Ewald to pay the costs.

    Top