Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TO0778

    Sklep Splošnega sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 13. marca 2020.
    Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. proti Evropski komisiji.
    Zadeva T-778/17 REC.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:116

     ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber)

    13 March 2020 ( *1 )

    (Rectification)

    In Case T‑778/17 REC,

    Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A., established in Poznań (Poland), represented by O. Geiss, D. Tayar and T. Siakka, lawyers,

    applicant,

    v

    European Commission, represented by L. Armati, K. Herrmann and S. Noë, acting as Agents,

    defendant,

    supported by

    Republic of Poland, represented by B. Majczyna and M. Rzotkiewicz, acting as Agents,

    intervener,

    APPLICATION for rectification of the judgment of 24 October 2019, Autostrada Wielkopolska v Commission (T‑778/17, EU:T:2019:756),

    THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber),

    composed of S. Gervasoni (Rapporteur), President, L. Madise and P. Nihoul, Judges,

    Registrar: E. Coulon,

    makes the following

    Order

    1

    The Court delivered a judgment on 24 October 2019Autostrada Wielkopolksa v Commission (T‑778/17, EU:T:2019:756).

    2

    In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes or errors in calculation or obvious inaccuracies found in paragraph 66 of that judgment.
     

    On those grounds,

    THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber)

    hereby orders:
     

    In paragraph 66 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, is to be read as

     

    ‘Fourthly, the applicant cannot usefully argue that the Commission only became aware of the electronic files relating to financial models after the opening decision.’

     

    instead of as

     

    ‘Fourthly, the applicant can usefully argue that the Commission only became aware of the electronic files relating to financial models after the opening decision.’.

     

    Luxembourg, 13 March 2020.

    E. Coulon

    Registrar

    S. Gervasoni

    President

    ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.

    Top