EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62002TJ0071
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2003. # Classen Holding KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Admissibility of appeal before the Board of Appeal - Formal requirements - Filing of a written statement setting out the grounds of appeal - Time-limit for applying for restitutio in integrum - Articles 59 and 78 of Regulation No 40/94. # Case T-71/02.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje (četrti senat) z dne 17. septembra 2003.
Classen Holding KG proti Uradu za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) (UUNT).
Znamka Skupnosti.
Zadeva T-71/02.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje (četrti senat) z dne 17. septembra 2003.
Classen Holding KG proti Uradu za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) (UUNT).
Znamka Skupnosti.
Zadeva T-71/02.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2003:234
«(Community trade mark – Admissibility of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Formal requirements – Filing of a written statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Time-limit for applying for restitutio in integrum – Articles 59 and 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)»
|
||||
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 78(2))
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 78(1) and (3))
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 59; Commission Regulation No 2868/95, Art. 1, Rule 49)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)
17 September 2003 (1)
((Community trade mark – Admissibility of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Formal requirements – Filing of a written statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Time-limit for applying for restitutio in integrum – Articles 59 and 78 of Regulation No 40/94))
In Case T-71/02, Classen Holding KG, established in Essen (Germany), represented by S. von Petersdorff-Campen, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by S. Laitinen, acting as Agent,defendant,
the intervener before the Court of First Instance beingInternational Paper Co., established in New York, New York (United States of America), represented by E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer, ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 December 2001 (Case R 810/1999-2) declaring inadmissible, following rejection of the application for restitutio in integrum, the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division in opposition proceedings between Classen Holding KG and International Paper Co.,THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Fourth Chamber),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 30 April 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber),
hereby:
Tiili |
Mengozzi |
Vilaras |
H. Jung |
V. Tiili |
Registrar |
President |