Oznámenie Komisie Rade a Európskemu Parlamentu o výsledkoch záverečného hodnotenia protidrogovej stratégie a protidrogového akčného plánu EÚ (2000 - 2004) /* KOM/2004/0707 v konečnom znení */
Brusel, 22.10.2004 KOM(2004)707 v konečnom znení OZNÁMENIE KOMISIE RADE A EURÓPSKEMU PARLAMENTU o výsledkoch záverečného hodnotenia protidrogovej stratégie a protidrogového akčného plánu EÚ (2000 - 2004) 1. PROTIDROGOVÁ STRATÉGIA EÚ A PROTIDROGOVÝ AKčNÝ PLÁN EÚ (2000 - 2004) V r. 1999 predložila Komisia oznámenie o akčnom pláne Európskej únie na boj proti drogám (2000 - 2004)[1]. Na jeho základe schválila Európska rada v Helsinkách protidrogovú stratégiu EÚ na roky 2000 - 2004[2]. Stratégia vyzýva na multidisciplinárny a integrovaný prístup k drogám tam, kde sa zníženie dopytu a ponuky drog považuje za rovnako dôležité a navzájom sa posilňujúce súčasti vyrovnanej stratégie. V júni 2000 prijala Európska rada vo Feire protidrogový akčný plán EÚ na roky 2000 - 2004[3]. Tento akčný plán preložil protidrogovú stratégiu EÚ do približne stovky konkrétnych opatrení, ktoré majú prijať členské štáty, Komisia, Európske monitorovacie centrum pre drogy a drogové závislosti (EMCDDA) a Europol. Akčný plán stanovuje, že Komisia by mala príslušné hodnotenia organizovať v strednodobom pláne a po ukončení platnosti protidrogovej stratégie EÚ na roky 2000 - 2004. V novembri 2002 Komisia predložila oznámenie o strednodobom hodnotení[4]. Toto oznámenie predkladá výsledky záverečného hodnotenia a kladie základy budúceho vývoja protidrogovej politiky EÚ na základe lekcií získaných pri implementácii súčasnej politiky. 2. CIEľ A PROCES ZÁVEREčNÉHO HODNOTENIA 2.1. Cieľ Cieľom záverečného hodnotenia je vyhodnotiť dosiahnutú úroveň činností stanovených v akčnom pláne, vyhodnotiť rozsah, do akého spĺňajú ciele protidrogovej stratégie, a vyhodnotiť dopad protidrogovej stratégie a akčného plánu na drogovú situáciu v Európskej únii. Hodnotenie vplyvu protidrogovej politiky sa stále vyvíja a nedostatok presných a kvantifikovateľných prevádzkových cieľov súčasnej protidrogovej stratégie a akčného plánu túto úlohu vôbec neuľahčuje. Začal sa však proces hodnotenia vplyvu a definovania kľúčových indikátorov a nástrojov, ktoré môžu pri prijímaní nových stratégií a politík v budúcnosti slúžiť ako normy kvality. 2.2. Proces Toto hodnotenie sa začalo v apríli 2003 založením riadiacej skupiny (zloženej zo zástupcov Komisie, štyroch členských štátov, ktoré jej budú predsedať v rokoch 2003 - 2004, EMCDDA a Europolu), ktorá má dohliadať na záverečné hodnotenie a usmerňovať ho. Táto skupina sa zišla pri štyroch príležitostiach, aby určila nástroje a metódy hodnotenia a monitorovala proces. V novembri 2003 bol vtedajším členským štátom zaslaný dotazník[5], v ktorom mali uviesť podrobné údaje o opatreniach v implementovanom akčnom pláne (príloha 1). Podobná tabuľka bola zaslaná príslušným služobným zložkám Komisie, EMCDDA a Europolu (príloha 2). EMCDDA a Komisia pripravili sériu tematických publikácií zameraných na konkrétne aspekty problému drog[6]. EMCDDA a Europol spolu vypracovali štatistický obraz, ktorý obsahoval základné údaje o drogovej situácii v r. 1999 a v r. 2002 - 2003[7]. V období apríl/máj 2004 sa uskutočnil prieskum Eurobarometer o postojoch/vnímaní drog mládežou[8]. Hlavné získané výsledky sa porovnávajú s výsledkami podobného prieskumu z r. 2002. Okrem toho sa zohľadnila aj záverečná správa o poriadkových orgánoch a ich úlohe v boji proti obchodovaniu s drogami[9], o implementačných plánoch týkajúcich sa ponuky syntetických drog[10] a o znížení ich ponuky a dopytu[11], správa o pokroku v implementácii schválená Radou[12] a ďalšie iniciatívy (príloha 3). Analyzovali sa údaje z viacerých zdrojov, aby sa vyzdvihli priaznivé výsledky dosiahnuté v tomto období a zdôraznili oblasti, ktoré si vyžadujú ďalší pokrok. Táto informácia sa použila aj na vyhodnotenie dosiahnutej úrovne aktivít stanovených v akčnom pláne a na vyhodnotenie rozsahu, do akého výsledok akčného plánu splnil ciele protidrogovej stratégie. Štatistický obraz poskytuje základ na hodnotenie účinku protidrogovej stratégie a akčného plánu na drogovú situáciu. Údaje uvedené v záverečnom hodnotení sa týkajú obdobia od r.1999 do júna 2004. 3. HLAVNÉ VÝSLEDKY A OBLASTI, V KTORÝCH JE POTREBNÝ ĎALŠÍ POKROK 3.1. Koordinácia Výsledky dosiahnuté na národnej úrovni - Od r. 1999 prijímajú členské štáty vylepšené národné protidrogové stratégie. Väčšina z nich pokrýva celý rozsah protidrogových činností. - Medzi členskými štátmi sa zvýšilo vedomie potreby multidisciplinárnej koordinácie v protidrogovej oblasti. Všetky členské štáty uznávajú, že ide o základný element protidrogovej politiky, aj keď neexistuje jednotná definícia pojmu "koordinácia". Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na národnej úrovni - Národnú protidrogovú koordináciu treba rozšíriť na všetky oblasti protidrogovej politiky vrátane pravidelnej konzultácie s občianskou spoločnosťou. - Navyše by delegáciám skôr než samotná koordinácia na národnej úrovni (napr. medzi verejnými zdravotníckymi orgánmi, orgánmi justície a vnútra, zahraničia a rozpočtu) pomohlo, keby si vyjasnili svoje postavenie v rámci Rady. Výsledky dosiahnuté na úrovni EÚ - Od prijatia akčného plánu sa národní koordinátori protidrogového programu stretávajú dvakrát do roka. - Komisia vydala oznámenie o protidrogovej koordinácii v r. 2003. O publikácii obsahujúcej názory horizontálnej protidrogovej skupiny na oznámenie sa diskutuje. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na úrovni EÚ - Oznámenie Komisie zaistilo adekvátne sledovanie protidrogovej koordinácie. Zasadania národných koordinátorov by sa mali väčšmi sústreďovať na špecifické otázky. - Komisia by mala posilniť a sproduktívniť svoje interné mechanizmy koordinácie: vyžaduje sa viditeľnejšia a funkčnejšia koordinácia všetkých služieb zapojených do protidrogových akcií. Pokračovať v činnosti by mali aj jej štrukturálne spojenia s EMCDDA. - Medzi pracovnými skupinami Rady, ktoré sa zaoberajú drogovými problémami, neexistuje jasné rozdelenie zodpovedností. Celkovú zodpovednosť za koordináciu práce rôznych skupín na drogových problémoch by mala niesť horizontálna protidrogová skupina. - Občianska spoločnosť nebola pri tvorbe protidrogovej politiky EÚ pravidelne konzultovaná a táto konzultácia by sa mala stať bežným javom. To bude predmetom oznámenia Komisie v r. 2005. 3.2. Informácie a hodnotenie Výsledky dosiahnuté na národnej úrovni - Vo väčšine členských štátov sa zlepšila dostupnosť a kvalita údajov o drogovej situácii, lebo má politickú podporu potrebnú pre špecifické informačné a hodnotiace aktivity. - Všetky členské štáty sa zaviazali používať päť kľúčových epidemiologických indikátorov[13] a poskytovať porovnateľné a konsolidované údaje. - Niektoré členské štáty pokročili vo vývoji nástrojov na pravidelné hodnotenie efektívnosti svojich akcií v protidrogovej oblasti. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na národnej úrovni - Malo by sa zlepšiť systematické monitorovanie implementácie národných protidrogových stratégií/akčných plánov. Pokrok je potrebný aj na zabezpečenie pravidelného hodnotenia ich implementácie. - Členské štáty by sa mali snažiť o úplnú implementáciu epidemiologických indikátorov. - Ďalšie zlepšenie si vyžaduje aj poskytovanie informácií o verejných výdavkoch v protidrogovej oblasti a analýza pomeru nákladnosti a efektívnosti politík. Výsledky dosiahnuté na úrovni EÚ - Zlepšila sa dostupnosť a kvalita údajov a informácií o drogovej situácii najmä pomocou siete EMCDDA a národných koordinačných orgánov. - Proces záverečného hodnotenia viedol k vývoju kľúčových metodických nástrojov a k vytvoreniu riadiacej skupiny, ktorá by mohla zabezpečiť rámec pre budúce hodnotenia protidrogových politík EÚ. - Zlepšila sa výmena informácií o vznikajúcich trendoch v užívaní drog, čiastočne aj vďaka založeniu systému včasného upozorňovania v rámci spoločnej akcie proti syntetickým drogám.[14] Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na úrovni EÚ - Neexistuje dostatok informácií o trestnej činnosti súvisiacej s drogami a viac treba pracovať na vhodných indikátoroch a zohľadniť prácu EMCDDA a Europolu v tejto oblasti. - Mali by sa zlepšiť mechanizmy monitorovania vznikajúcich trendov v užívaní drog. Ďalej by sa mal vyvíjať aj výskum týchto trendov. 3.3. Zníženie dopytu Výsledky dosiahnuté na národnej úrovni - Všetkým členským štátom je jasné, že by si mali uvedomiť potrebu prevencie od raného veku. Členské štáty vytvorili globálne programy prevencie, do ktorých sú zapojení príslušní odborníci a občianska spoločnosť. - Čoraz viac sa implementujú špecifické programy prevencie zamerané na prevenciu užívania viacerých drog a zneužívanie povolených a zakázaných látok. Informačné kampane sa stále častejšie zameriavajú na cieľové skupiny a zaoberajú sa rizikovým správaním a návykom všeobecne. - Väčšina členských štátov zvýšila financovanie a dostupnosť liečenia a diverzifikovala rozsah možností liečenia. - Vo všetkých členských štátoch sa viac pozornosti venuje páchateľom trestných činov, ktorí užívajú drogy, ako to ilustruje zvýšenie spoločenských alternatív uväznenia a väčšia dostupnosť psychologických a zdravotných zásahov vo väzniciach. - Všetky členské štáty skúmali účinky jazdy pod vplyvom zakázaných drog a liekov a niektoré z nich zaviedli prísnejšie kontrolné opatrenia. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na národnej úrovni - Malo by sa vykonávať pravidelnejšie hodnotenie efektívnosti opatrení na zníženie zdravotného poškodenia súvisiaceho s drogovou závislosťou a liečebných opatrení. - Členské štáty by mali vytvoriť uznávanú kvalifikáciu pre odborníkov na prevenciu užívania drog a zmenšovania zdravotného poškodenia súvisiaceho s drogovou závislosťou. Výsledky dosiahnuté na úrovni EÚ - Rada prijala viacero uznesení o otázkach drogovej prevencie (porovnaj prílohu 3). - Program práce Spoločenstva na prevencii drogovej závislosti (1996 - 2002)[15] a nový program zdravia obyvateľstva (2003 - 2008)[16] zabezpečili spolufinancovanie projektov drogovej prevencie. Teraz vzniká problém s liečením. - V r. 2003 bolo prijaté odporúčanie Rady o prevencii a znížení zdravotného poškodenia súvisiaceho s drogovou závislosťou[17]. - Prijal sa aj akčný program bezpečnosti na cestách Európskej únie[18] a uznesenie Rady o boji proti vplyvu užívania psychotropných látok na dopravné nehody[19]. Obidva sa zaoberajú účinkami alkoholu, drog a liekov na riadenie motorových vozidiel. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na úrovni EÚ - EÚ by mala podporovať ďalší výskum biolekárskych, psychosociálnych a iných faktorov stojacich v pozadí užívania drog a drogovej závislosti najmä v oblastiach, kde je tento výskum ešte stále obmedzený (napr. dlhodobé užívanie konope alebo syntetických drog). - Malo by sa zlepšiť šírenie spoľahlivých a vysoko kvalitných informácií a najlepších postupov. - Komisia bude naďalej sledovať kľúčové body uvedeného odporúčania Rady z r. 2003. 3.4. Zníženie ponuky Výsledky dosiahnuté na národnej úrovni - Vo väčšine členských štátov sa zlepšila spolupráca medzi poriadkovými orgánmi založením/posilnením takých štruktúr a činností, ako sú napr. spoločné policajné/colné tímy, spoločné poriadkové operácie a memorandá porozumenia. - Zdá sa, že viacero členských štátov už môže fungovať v súlade s ustanoveniami článku 17 (nezákonné obchodovanie po mori) dohovoru OSN z r. 1988 proti nezákonnému obchodovaniu s narkotikami a psychotropnými látkami. - Všetky členské štáty transponovali do národného práva prvú smernicu o praní špinavých peňazí[20] a 11 transponovalo smernicu, ktorá ju mení a dopĺňa[21]. Okrem toho členské štáty zaviedli nové opatrenia na zníženie prania špinavých peňazí, ako napr. právomoci na protitransakcie a zvýšené právomoci kontroly cestujúcich, ktorí privážajú do krajiny veľké sumy peňazí. - Desať členských štátov transponovalo ustanovenia rámcového rozhodnutia Rady o spoločných vyšetrovacích tímoch[22] a/alebo ratifikovalo dohovor EÚ o vzájomnej právnej pomoci v trestných záležitostiach[23], alebo naznačilo, že platná legislatíva už umožňuje zostaviť tieto tímy. - Desať členských štátov ratifikovalo dohovor o vzájomnej pomoci a spolupráci medzi colnými správami (Neapol II)[24]. Štrnásť členských štátov ratifikovalo dohovor o používaní informačnej technológie na colné účely (CIS)[25]. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na národnej úrovni - Členské štáty, ktoré nenahlásili, že majú oficiálne štruktúry na spoluprácu medzi svojimi národnými poriadkovými orgánmi, by mali zvážiť prípadné založenie týchto oficiálnych štruktúr. - Členské štáty by mali zabezpečiť zavedenie potrebných postupov, ktoré im umožnia fungovať v súlade s ustanoveniami článku 17 dohovoru OSN z r. 1988, a mali by zvážiť vytvorenie pokynov na ich implementáciu. - Členské štáty, ktoré tak ešte neurobili, mali by transponovať druhú smernicu o praní špinavých peňazí[26], rámcové rozhodnutie Rady o spoločných vyšetrovacích tímoch a/alebo ratifikovať dohovor EÚ o vzájomnej právnej pomoci v trestných záležitostiach a ratifikovať Neapolský dohovor II a Dohovor o CIS. Výsledky dosiahnuté na úrovni EÚ - Spolupráca medzi poriadkovými orgánmi na úrovni EÚ sa zlepšuje vytváraním/posilňovaním štruktúr, činnosťou Europolu a Eurojustu a takými aktivitami ako spoločné vyšetrovania, spoločné colné operácie, námorná spolupráca, spoločné tímy a policajné a colné kooperačné strediská. - Vzniklo a prebieha viacero projektov EÚ (napr. CASE, EELS a EILCS) zameraných na identifikovanie výroby a predaja syntetických drog. - Od r. 2000 podlieha päť látok rozsiahlym kontrolným opatreniam EÚ na základe spoločnej akcie proti syntetickým drogám. - Finančné programy EÚ ako AGIS[27] hrajú významnú úlohu pri uľahčovaní spolupráce medzi poriadkovými orgánmi členských štátov. - Došlo k politickej dohode o rámcovom rozhodnutí Rady, ktorým sa zakladajú minimálne ustanovenia o základných prvkoch trestných činov a trestov v oblasti nezákonného obchodovania s drogami[28]. V krátkom čase sa očakáva jej oficiálne prijatie. - Bolo prijaté nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o predchodcoch drog (obchodovanie v rámci Spoločenstva).[29] Komisia predložila návrh nariadenia Rady o zahraničnom obchodovaní s predchodcami drog[30]. - OLAF zjednodušil dôležitú výmenu informácií o riziku zneužívania predchodcov drog a naďalej podporuje systémy Yachtinfo a Marinfo. - Diskutuje sa o ďalšom vývoji stálej prevádzkovej koordinačnej jednotky na podporu spoločných colných operácií. - Komisia prijala návrh tretej smernice o praní špinavých peňazí[31]. - Lepší rámec spolupráce zabezpečil prijatie rozhodnutia Rady[32] o výmene informácií medzi finančnými spravodajskými jednotkami (FIUs). - Niekoľko členských štátov diskutuje o vytvorení spoločných tímov a zabezpečení ďalších ďalekosiahlych právomocí pre svoje policajné a súdne orgány, aby mohli operovať na území iného členského štátu. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na úrovni EÚ - Členské štáty by mali vytvoriť spoločné vyšetrovacie tímy, ktoré sa budú zaoberať obchodovaním s drogami medzi týmito štátmi, ako o tom hovorí rámcové rozhodnutie Rady a dohovor. - Malo by sa hovoriť aj o ďalšom vývoji spoločných operácií poriadkových orgánov členských štátov. Založenie a výsledky týchto operácií by sa mali hlásiť Rade a Komisii. - Treba preskúmať ďalší vývoj operácií na likvidáciu výroby a predaja syntetických drog. Užitočným začiatkom tohto procesu by mohli byť návrhy predložené Komisiou na zmapovanie distribučných sietí. - Malo by sa úplne implementovať odporúčanie Rady o zosúladení štatistík poriadkových orgánov o drogách a zneužívaných predchodcoch drog[33]. - Európsky parlament a Rada by mali v najkratšom možnom čase prijať tretiu smernicu o praní špinavých peňazí. 3.5. Rozšírenie Hoci ešte osem mesiacov pred koncom obdobia pokrytého protidrogovou stratégiou k rozšíreniu nedošlo, protidrogové iniciatívy tvoria súčasť acquis EÚ. Na dotazník Komisie dobrovoľne odpovedali všetky nové členské štáty a dve z kandidátskych krajín[34]. Súhrn týchto údajov bude uvedený v samostatnej správe. Dosiahnuté výsledky - Program PHARE a ďalšie relevantné programy Spoločenstva sú mimoriadne užitočné na oboznámenie nových členských štátov a kandidátskych krajín s protidrogovými prvkami acquis. - Skoro všetky členské štáty poskytli novým členským štátom pomoc v ich úsilí bojovať proti zneužívaniu drog a obchodovaniu s drogami. Členské štáty poskytujú podobnú pomoc aj kandidátskym krajinám. - Všetky nové členské štáty transponovali protidrogové prvky acquis do svojej národnej legislatívy a kandidátske krajiny tak práve teraz robia. - Kapitola SVZ acquis bola predbežne uzavretá pre Bulharsko a rokovania s Rumunskom pokračujú. - S Bulharskom, Rumunskom a Tureckom sa parafovali dohody o účasti v sieti EMCDDA. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok - Pri implementácii protidrogových prvkov acquis by mala existovať úzka spolupráca s novými členskými štátmi a kandidátskymi krajinami. - Nové členské štáty by mali plne využívať AGIS a iné relevantné programy na uľahčenie spolupráce s ostatnými členskými štátmi. - Dohody s troma kandidátskymi krajinami o ich možnej účasti v sieti EMCDDA by mali čo najskôr vstúpiť do platnosti. - Program PHARE a ďalšie programy Spoločenstva by mali naďalej poskytovať kandidátskym krajinám pomoc v protidrogovej oblasti. 3.6. Medzinárodná spolupráca Výsledky dosiahnuté na národnej úrovni - Členské štáty poskytujú tretím krajinám pomoc v súvislosti s drogami na bilaterálnom základe a/alebo prostredníctvom Úradu pre drogy a zločin pri OSN (UNODC). - Viacero členských štátov spolupracuje s tretími krajinami na vývoji a zlepšovaní systémov proti praniu špinavých peňazí. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na národnej úrovni - Všetky členské štáty by mali systematicky plniť databázu, ktorú vytvorila Komisia k projektom technickej pomoci v kandidátskych a tretích krajinách v protidrogovej oblasti. - Členské štáty by mali pravidelne informovať Radu a Komisiu o svojich bilaterálnych aktivitách v tretích krajinách a regiónoch. Výsledky dosiahnuté na úrovni EÚ - Komisia sústreďuje svoje úsilie na dve hlavné drogové cesty do EÚ. - Komisia pravidelne informuje Radu o svojej protidrogovej pomoci v tretích krajinách/regiónoch a o vylepšenom integračnom procese, z ktorého financuje protidrogové projekty v tretích krajinách/regiónoch. - V kontexte európskej susedskej politiky sa vo viacerých krajinách diskutuje o akčných plánoch. Tieto plány normálne obsahujú oddiel, ktorý sa zaoberá drogami. - Všetky relevantné externé dohody Spoločenstva obsahujú špecifické ustanovenia o drogách. Oblasti, v ktorých je potrebný ďalší pokrok na úrovni EÚ - Členské štáty a Komisia by mali aj naďalej zabezpečovať koordinované postoje EÚ na medzinárodných fórach zaoberajúcich sa otázkou drog, najmä v komisii OSN pre narkotiká. - Členské štáty a Komisia by mali naďalej spájať protidrogovú pomoc, ktorú poskytujú Strednej Ázii, latinskoamerickým a karibským štátom a západným balkánskym štátom, s protidrogovými akčnými plánmi prijatými v týchto regiónoch. V tomto zmysle by sa mohol zvážiť aj vhodný mechanizmus financovania. - Je potrebné zabezpečiť spojenie medzi prijatím nových protidrogových akčných plánov EÚ pre rôzne regióny a prideľovaním prostriedkov na ich implementáciu. - Experti na drogy v členských štátoch by sa naďalej mali aktívne zúčastňovať vývoja/revidovania programových dokumentov krajín/regiónov a zaoberať sa drogovými problémami. Mala by sa zlepšiť aj koordinácia medzi geografickými pracovnými skupinami a horizontálnou protidrogovou skupinou. - V určitých krajinách/regiónoch by sa mali monitorovať a zohľadňovať nové objavy a trendy v užívaní a výrobe drog. - Mali by sa plne využívať existujúce mechanizmy medzinárodnej koordinácie v protidrogovej oblasti ako napr. Dublinská skupina. 4. ZÁVERY I. Hodnotenie dosiahnutej úrovne aktivít stanovených v akčnom pláne - Asi 95 % akcií stanovených v protidrogovom akčnom pláne EÚ už bolo implementovaných, alebo sa nachádza v niektorom štádiu implementácie. - Protidrogová stratégia a akčný plán EÚ sa stali ústredným referenčným bodom konania a poskytujú rámec pre protidrogové aktivity a iniciatívy na národnej úrovni aj na úrovni EÚ. - Skoro všetky členské štáty prijali národnú protidrogovú stratégiu alebo akčný plán. Elementy týchto národných protidrogových stratégií a akčných plánov zahŕňajú spoločné vzory s prístupom EÚ uvedeným v protidrogovej stratégii a akčnom pláne EÚ. II. Hodnotenie rozsahu, do akého plnenie akčného plánu splnilo ciele protidrogovej stratégie - Niet pochýb, že implementácia akcií v akčnom pláne viac-menej prispieva k plneniu 11 cieľov protidrogovej stratégie EÚ. III. Hodnotenie vplyvu na drogovú situáciu - Aspoň určitý pokrok sa zaznamenal v dosiahnutí niektorých cieľov protidrogovej stratégie EÚ (cieľa 2, a najmä cieľa 3)[35]. - Na základe hodnotiacich nástrojov neexistuje pevný dôkaz, ktorý by podporil tvrdenie, že sa dosiahol účel cieľa 1 výrazne znížiť výskyt užívania drog, alebo že drogy užíva menej mladých ľudí. Údaje z obrazu však naznačujú, že možno pozorovať celkovú stabilizáciu stúpajúceho trendu výskytu užívania drog, aj keď jeho úroveň možno z historického hľadiska pokladať za vysokú. - Ani dostupné informácie nenaznačujú podstatné zníženie dostupnosti drog (cieľ 4). Ciele 4 a 5 spolu sú zároveň katalyzátorom pre viacero iniciatív na úrovni EÚ, ktoré posilňujú opatrenia poriadkových orgánov proti obchodovaniu s drogami a zásobovaniu drogami. - Viacero významných iniciatív bolo prijatých aj na boj proti praniu špinavých peňazí (cieľ 6.1). V súvislosti s cieľom 6.2 sa členské štáty zúčastňujú viacerých dôležitých iniciatív boja proti zneužívaniu predchodcov drog, napr. spoločnej európskej jednotky boja proti predchodcom drog. Boli prednesené významné návrhy na zmenu a doplnenie právnych predpisov Spoločenstva v oblasti kontroly obchodovania s predchodcami drog. 5. NÁVRHY - Budúca protidrogová stratégia EÚ by mala obsahovať jasné a presné ciele a priority, ktoré možno preložiť do operačných indikátorov a akcií v budúcom akčnom pláne, spolu s jasnou definíciou zodpovednosti a termínmi implementácie. Pri stanovovaní týchto cieľov a priorít by sa mali brať do úvahy informačné systémy a hodnotiace nástroje. - Ďalší pokrok by sa mal urobiť aj v sprístupňovaní, kvalite a porovnateľnosti informácií o monitorovaní drogovej situácie. - Začiatkom roka 2005 prednesie Komisia návrh na protidrogový akčný plán na roky 2005 - 2008. Okrem toho bude Komisia každoročne vypracúvať prehľad postupu implementácie tohto akčného plánu a v r. 2008 zorganizuje hodnotenie dopadu s cieľom navrhnúť druhý akčný plán na obdobie rokov 2009 - 2012. Aj v rokoch 2009 - 2012 bude Komisia vypracúvať každoročný prehľad pokroku. V r. 2012 Komisia zorganizuje celkové hodnotenie protidrogovej stratégie a akčných plánov EÚ, ktoré predloží Rade a Európskemu parlamentu. - Ciele novej protidrogovej stratégie a akčných plánov by sa mali odraziť vo viacročnom programe konsolidácie oblasti slobody, bezpečnosti a spravodlivosti. - Práca horizontálnej protidrogovej skupiny Rady by sa mala zameriavať v prvom rade na napredovanie a monitorovanie implementácie akcií stanovených v budúcich protidrogových akčných plánoch EÚ, ako aj na svoju vedúcu úlohu v koordinácii práce ostatných skupín Rady na drogových problémoch. - V protidrogovej oblasti sa implementuje mnoho zaujímavých a užitočných aktivít. Výsledky týchto aktivít by mali byť všetkým známejšie, aby podporili podobné aktivity inde. V tomto kontexte by sa malo zvážiť organizovanie každoročných seminárov o aspekte protidrogovej politiky spojenej s týmito aktivitami. - Toto záverečné hodnotenie by sa malo vziať do úvahy pri vývoji novej protidrogovej stratégie EÚ na roky 2005 - 2012. ANNEX 1 Summary of 15 Member States responses to the questionnaire on the implementation of the EU Action Plan on Drugs (2000-2004) 1. Co-ordination 1.2.2 What steps has your country taken towards the establishment or the strengthening of the national co-ordination mechanisms since 1999? Has your country appointed a National Drugs Co-ordinator in the related period? Does your country envisage carrying out or has your country carried out an evaluation of the co-ordination mechanisms? All Member States recognise the importance of coordinating the activities of the multiple actors involved in the drugs issue. They report to have mechanisms in place for coordinating their national drugs policies. Member States have adopted different models of coordination, depending on their national administrative structures and on the aspects of the fight against drugs they intend to focus on; some have interdepartmental committees, some have appointed national drug coordinators (e.g. France, Germany, Luxembourg, Portugal, Italy, Spain and Sweden) and/or established dedicated coordination units or bodies (e.g. Austria, Greece, Ireland, Finland). Some, however, lack coordination mechanisms that cover all aspects. Few Member States provide for evaluation of their coordination mechanisms. 1.2.4 In what way has your country ensured a balanced and multidisciplinary approach in national drugs programmes and policies and their implementation? The importance of maintaining a multidisciplinary and balanced approach is clearly recognised by all Member States. Most have adopted a national plan or strategy on drugs (Belgium Denmark, Greece, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain and the UK). 1.3.2 Has your country developed a specific strategy for co-operation with civil society regarding drug abuse? Please give details. Most Member States make provisions for involving civil society in the fields of prevention, health care and treatment, mainly at local level. Most of them also consult civil society on an ad hoc basis, e.g. for specific projects. Many Member States mention financial support for community groups and organisations as a way of cooperating with civil society. Some countries (Germany, Greece, Ireland, and Sweden) have more regular contacts with the networks of NGOs, the voluntary sector, associations, etc. These countries recognise the importance of linking policy making and practice through dialogue with civil society, but also refer to the supporting work done by these organisations to influence public opinion. 1.4.2. In which way has your country encouraged the provision of funding for the prevention of drug use, the prevention of drug related crime, the reduction of the negative health and social consequences of drugs and other proactive measures? Public expenditure on prevention and risk reduction programmes and measures are different from one country to another depending on the national administrative structure, ministerial budgets and social security systems. Some Member States (Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, and United Kingdom) indicate an increase of funding for drug-demand reduction. 1.5 In which way has your country shared information with other Member States on national strategies and action plans? Has your country made use of the EMCDDA database on drug laws, the Falcone and OISIN programmes or any other tools for information exchange and operational co-operation? Please describe. Member States consider other national measures, strategies and action plans as useful examples for orienting their own national debate. Very often information exchange is made via bilateral contacts and visits. The Horizontal Drugs Group and the meetings of the national coordinators are recognised as important occasions to share information and views. All Member States acknowledge the importance of learning from the others and quote internet as an important source of information. Most of them report regular input and consultation of the EMCDDA databases (EDDRA, ELDD). As far as law enforcement information sharing is concerned, most Member States mention the Europol national liaison officers. All Member States were able to take part in joint projects co-financed by the Commission's OISIN and/or the Falcone programmes. Since 2003 XXX (can we give a figure??) have received funding under the new AGIS programme[36]. 2. Information and Evaluation 2.1.1 and 2.1.4 Does your country fully or partly provide information on the 5 key epidemiological indicators of the EMCDDA? If your country does not fully provide information on the 5 key epidemiological indicators when do you believe you will be in a position to do so? Please give brief description of the evolution of political and financial support to implement the 5 harmonised key indicators. All Member States have established systems for the gathering and treatment of data which will provide comparable and reliable data on the 5 key epidemiologic indicators, and most Member States are able to provide (partial) information on all indicators. In order to improve the data quality of the used sources and to alleviate the lack of information on some indicators, Member States have introduced the necessary amendments in their legislative systems, organised special workgroups composed of representatives from various Ministries, services, and NGOs specialised in the fight against drugs and actively participated in EMCDDA workshops In most Member States, political and financial support provided by the government for establishing the five indicators (particularly through the national budget to the REITOX Network) is considered sufficient. 2.2.6 and 2.2.7 Which measures are used in your country to assess the effectiveness of preventing and combating organised drug related crime? What kind of crime and policy indicators has your country developed? Has your country drafted an annual assessment on the role of organised crime groups involved in drug trafficking? No unanimity exists among member States on the methodology used to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive actions and measures to fight organised crime related to drug-trafficking, but all annual reports include statistics which illustrate the number of confiscations and their quantities, the share of dismantled clandestine laboratories, the number of arrests, the number of drug-related deaths and other indicators of repressive actions by the relevant agencies. Member States contribute to the annual EU Organised Crime report, which includes a section on drugs, in accordance with the criteria set out in Enfopol 35 Rev 2 (21.4.1997). Some Member States undertake further research on the linkage between drug phenomena and criminal activities, e.g. Ireland's public surveys on the nature of the policing, the visibility and perception of crime, including drug related crime. 3. Reduction of Demand, Prevention of Drug Use and of Drug Related Crime 3.1.1.1 Does your country have general programmes for the prevention of both licit and illicit drug use, including poly-drug use? In which way, if any, does your country encourage the inclusion of drug use prevention in school curricula? Are there programmes set-up to assist parents? If yes, please describe briefly. Member States underline the importance of prevention, and the need for better and accurate information campaigns and prevention programmes focused on the promotion of health as well as on the personal and social development of the young people. Prevention programmes can involve, among many other measures, the creation of prevention centres, specific training for experts and civil society (teachers, parents, support organisations...), health professionals and even representatives of the law enforcement services, working in the school environment and among young people. The importance of regular cooperation with young people's associations, sports clubs, as well as taking preventive actions in nightclubs and major music and dance events are also stressed, in a way to promote healthy initiatives. Frequently decentralised, organised at local level in collaboration with the local autorities and the civil society, whit a short duration, they address to youngsters and other target groups. Specific prevention projects aimed at tackling the poly-drug use and the abuse of licit substances (alcohol, tobacco, doping substances and medicinal products) are more and more implemented in all Member States. Member States agree on the effectiveness of school based drug education programme, but only a few countries (France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Spain, and UK) have clear references to illicit substances and their effects inscribed on the schools curriculum. 3.1.1.3 Could you describe the way your country allocated resources for positive alternatives to drugs for youngsters, in particular in socially deprived urban areas? Member States have many projects on positive alternatives to drug use specifically targeted on older children and adolescents in disadvantaged urban areas, namely through the creation of youth consultation centres that provide recreational, sports and educational activities with job counselling. The budget allocated to these prevention projects came from different sources: health, youth or social services, youth organisations as well as local projects supported by local authorities. Sweden gives precise details on amounts allocated. 3.1.1.4 Could you mention and describe briefly a particularly innovative approach to the prevention of the abuse of synthetic drugs developed in your country? Member States are stressing their concern for the increasing popularity of synthetic drugs in the European Union and underline the importance of school-based programmes and information campaigns aimed at young people, but also on the internet, in all media, as well as dance clubs and music festivals. The distribution of informative material, the implementation of risk reduction measures at parties, pill testing and cooperation with owners of night clubs, medical staff and police are also mentioned. 3.1.2.1, 3.1.2.6, 3.1.2.7 Has your country developed outreach work and/or easy accessible services for drug users? Which steps were taken to increase access and availability of services designed to reach drug abusers who were not integrated or covered by mainstream services? Please describe these briefly. Which were the strategies for vaccinating drug users against hepatitis A and B? Several Member States have adopted integrated policies for risk reduction which propose low-threshold services, such as programmes for syringe exchange, condom distribution, access to substitution treatments and drug consumption rooms. Certain high risk groups such as addicted pregnant women, homeless people, prostitutes and prison inmates can benefit from specific programmes. Vaccination against Hepatitis B, prevention and treatment of contagious diseases linked to intravenous drug abuse has been recognised as priorities by all Member States. 3.1.2.2, 3.1.2.3, 3.3.1 Please report briefly on any awareness raising campaigns carried out on the dangers related to drug use as well as on major programmes on the reduction of risks and consequences related to use. Do the actions target all age groups, in particular children and young people? In what sense have these campaigns been innovative and have made use of new means of communication such as, for example, the Internet? All Member states underline the importance of information/awareness campaigns on drug related risks and organise regular campaigns in the media for the general public, as well as specific ones directed at target groups. Campaigns aimed at specific substances (cannabis, cocaine, ecstasy...) are also mentioned. The spread of hotlines on drugs and the use of internet in the field of demand reduction seem to be increasing in all countries. Sweden gives a number of examples of messages aimed at young at young people in different campaign contexts. Finland mentionnes a specific emphasis in the use of internet in drug demand reduction. 3.1.2.4 In which way does your country ensure that enough attention is paid to drug related issues in training and education of doctors, social workers and other professionals in the health and social sector? Are they included in the curricula of the education of these professionals? Training of teachers, social workers, health professionals, and law enforcement representatives is a priority in all Member States and budgets have been allocated for this purpose. In several countries (Ireland, France, Germany, Portugal), specialisations in addiction, alcoholism, , and new substitution treatments are organised within the context of university courses. 3.1.2.5 Has any research been carried out in your country about the effects of driving under the influence of illicit drugs and pharmaceuticals? If yes, could you please summarize the results which could be relevant for policy decisions? Several Member States (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, Finland and UK) announced having undertaken research on driving under the influence of illegal substances, or in association with alcohol and/or medicines. In many cases legislation was reviewed and controls and sanctions reinforced. On the other hand, even though testing for alcohol is compulsory, testing drivers involved in accidents for narcotics is not yet systematic. 3.1.3.1 Which are the types of treatment services for drugs users, and measures to assist severely dependent individuals, including measures to reduce the health related damages provided in your country? Please describe briefly In accordance with their national situation and legislation, Member States have diversified drug care systems, which can include day-care centres, detoxification units, therapeutic communities, substitution centres, aftercare programmes and special units in prisons. Frequently carried out at local level and in collaboration with NGO's, they are directed towards different age groups, gender specific needs and drug dependent people in different stages of dependence. Some Member States have also underlined the existence of drug consumption rooms and programmes of medical heroin delivery (Belgium, Germany). 3.1.3.2 Which are the average waiting periods for accessing treatment in your country? Member States indicate that, after investments in treatment services mainly at local level, there are no waiting periods for accessing treatment other than for residential treatment and substitution treatment. 3.1.3.3 Has your country defined guidelines for the standards and goals of treatment services, and ensured the evidence-based evaluation of these treatments? If yes, please briefly describe the outcome. Does your country have a national protocol on treatment assessment? The majority of Member States has not developed models for the systematic and global evaluation of drug treatment. However, scientific research on the effectiveness of the proposed measures is undertaken using the monitoring of drug-addicts under treatment (among other indicators). 3.1.3.4 In which way does your country ensure that adequate attention is paid to the social and professional integration of former addicts? Please describe briefly the most relevant measures adopted in this area, including any projects implemented under the Community Programmes between 1999 and 2003 The professional and social integration of drug addicts, considered very important by all Member States, is promoted in co-operation with NGO's, local authorities and the business community, to provide for educational programmes, vocational training and special employment opportunities for ex-addicts. The Netherlands and UK underline the programmes aimed at tackling this issue within the criminal justice system and the measures to prepare the drug misusing offender reintegration into the labour market. 3.2.2 Have the resources for research into the biomedical and social causes of addiction, prevention and behavioural patterns of drug consumption been modified during the reference period? Several Member States indicate that they do not have exact figures for functions allocated to drug research, by the government departments, universities, NGOs, and research institutes. Nevertheless, they stress the importance of studies on epidemiology, public health and social sciences in achieving a better definition of public policies. 3.2.3 Has your country identified new areas where it is considered useful to implement actions at the European level to contribute to reduce drug-related harm? New consumption trends, international and trans-border cooperation are areas generally identified as deserving greater attention within the EU. 3.3.2 How has your country addressed risk behaviour and addiction in general, including aspects of alcohol, medicine, substances used for doping in sport and tobacco use? Member States' strategies and policies are increasingly geared towards addictions in general, linking licit and illicit drugs, with special measures concerning alcohol, tobacco, doping substances and abuse of medicinal products. Belgium also takes into account gambling and food dependency. 3.4.1.1 What programmes have been set-up in your country to promote best practices in the prevention of criminal activities linked with drugs, juvenile and urban delinquency? The prevention of drug related crime, juvenile and urban delinquency is a priority for Member States which have allocated funds for programmes based on in-service training of police and other prevention agents, information campaigns on drugs and measures for the development of a healthy lifestyle through sports, leisure and educational activities, acquisition of specific skills, implementation of peer groups, counselling/follow up, cultural activities, and treatment/counselling activities. In the Netherlands, the project "Communities that care", which involves civil society, aims to create a safe and liveable environment for young people. 3.4.2 and 3.4.3 Could you describe the mechanisms in place to provide alternatives to Prison (in particular for young offenders). Which measures have been foreseen to provide drug prevention and treatment services and, where appropriate, measures to reduce health damages in prisons and upon release from prison? In several Member States(Portugal, Denmark...), depending the penal system and on the basis of the voluntary acceptance of treatment, a large spectrum of alternative measures is proposed to drug addicts in order to avoid incarceration: financial penalties and administrative sanctions, community work, vocational training and follow-up, etc. In view of the high level of drug consumption in prisons, some countries have introduced risk reduction measures, such as vaccination programmes, needles exchange, drug free rooms, substitution treatments by methadone, etc. 3.4.4 Please mention the main examples of sharing with other Member States best practices on the handling of drugs addicts in the justice system. In what way were the results of the study prepared by the EMCDDA in this field considered by your country Some Member States refer to sharing best practices in the treatment of drug addicts in the justice system through active participation in the European Union Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN) and the European Network Drugs Services in Prison (ENDSP), as well as cooperation with other Member States within the EMCDDA and the Pompidou Group. The study of the EMCDDA is referred to by only few countries. 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3 In view of the need to develop expertise in the prevention of drug use, has your country promoted the creation of co-ordinated qualification skills in this area? What has been done in order to encourage the development and implementation of a network of trainers and other professionals in the health and social sector? How have the best practices been promoted and brought to the attention of other Member States and the Commission? Training of prevention agents is deemed paramount in all Member States, although efforts must still be made to create formal qualifications. In the context of health promotion strategies, expert networks and specialised training centres have been established to ensure permanent training of the various prevention agents. Several Member States underline the role of the EDDRA and EMCDDA networks, of the Pompidou Group and of the HDG in the exchange of information on prevention. 4. Supply Reduction 4.1.1.1 Please indicate which measures your country has applied to ensure a high and uniform level of security at the external borders of the EU in relation to drugs. Within Member States the law enforcement services involved in combating drug trafficking are involved in close co-operation. This co-operation can take the form of joint groups of risk analysis, a network of "contact points" between the relevant services, special teams of police and customs officers, a "coastal-watch" programme involving police, customs and the maritime rescue service, memoranda of understanding and operational protocols between the relevant services. In order to ensure a high level of security at the EU's external borders, Member State law enforcement services use a range of equipment such as drug detection scanners, patrol vessels, and drug detector dogs. Member States also refer to the training provided to law enforcement personnel in combating drug trafficking. Co-operation also takes place between the law enforcement services of different Member States. For example, there are police/customs co-operation centres, joint customs operations, and participation in training courses by one Member State in those hosted by another Member State. The Convention on mutual assistance and co-operation between customs administrations (Naples II) is also seen to have potential as a tool for cross-border co-operation. 4.1.1.3 Has your country, taking into account the existing EU systems for exchange of information and working with other Member States in the relevant Council bodies, reinforced its efforts against maritime drug trafficking? Has your country organised training courses on the identification and surveillance of suspicious vessels, and have you established procedures for boarding and searching vessels? Has your country implemented the principles laid down in Article 17 of the UN Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances? If so, please describe briefly how this has been done. A number of Member States have indicated that they are in a position to operate in accordance with the provisions of Article 17 of the 1988 UN Convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances or have incorporated Article 17 or parts of Article 17 into national law (Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands). Member States refer to a number of techniques used for combating maritime drug trafficking such as risk profiling, ship surveillance and vessel search techniques. Use is made of the maritime information systems such as MAR-INFO and YACHTINFO in order to exchange information on suspected drug trafficking and on drug seizures. Maritime co-operation between Member States has led to the capture of ships which were used for drug smuggling and the seizure of illicit drugs. Some Member States indicate that they have training courses in the field of combating maritime drug trafficking or such training is included as a part of the training provided to the relevant personnel (France, Germany, Ireland, and the Netherlands). One Member State (France) indicates that it has established a guide regarding the implementation of Article 17 of the 1988 UN Convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. 4.1.1.4 Has your country, with the support of Europol, examined the means to combine forensic and law enforcement information in order to identify the production and trafficking of synthetic drugs and those involved in their production and trafficking? What are the results of this analysis? At national level, Member States combine forensic and law enforcement information in order to identify the production and trafficking of synthetic drugs. In, at least, one Member State (France) a sharing of databases between the relevant law enforcement agencies containing scientific information on synthetic drugs is to be developed. Many Member States emphasise the importance of the various EU projects aimed at identifying the production and trafficking of synthetic drugs such as CASE, Synthes-lab, EELS, EILCS, and CHEDDAR 4.1.1.5 Has the co-operation between police, customs and judicial authorities been improved in your country in the drugs field? Has your country participated in EU Third Pillar Programmes in the field of co-operation between these authorities? Please give details, in particular of the results and benefits of such programmes for your country. Member State police and customs services participate in joint enforcement operations and investigations against drug traffickers, joint training courses and have appointed police/custom liaison officers. Some Member States have permanent joint police/customs teams (France, Germany, the Netherlands). Greece refers to its Central Anti-Drug Coordination Body with police and customs representation and the UK refers to its Concerted Inter-Agency Drugs Action Group. Training courses and seminars aimed at improving police, customs and judicial co-operation at EU level have received funding from the European Commission under various programmes. In the Nordic Member States police and customs collaboration takes place within a specific framework PTN (Police and Customs Co-operation in the Nordic Countries). 4.1.1.6 Has your country implemented the project-based EU law enforcement strategy against transnational organised crime to combat drug trafficking? Please describe briefly. Techniques used to combat organised crime include surveillance, infiltration and phone-taping. Investigations into the activities of trans-national organised crime groups involved in the distribution of drugs have taken place. These investigations have involved the law enforcement authorities of several Member States. Member States also participate in relevant Europol Analysis Work Files (AWFs) such as Mustard, Cola and Genesis. 4.1.2.2 and 4.1.2.3 What measures has your country taken against money laundering? How does the analysis and exchange of information between your Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and other FIUs work? All MS have transposed into national law Directive 91/308/CEE of the Council of 10 June 1991 on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and 11 (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the UK) have transposed Directive 2001/97/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 amending Council Directive 91/308/EEC. In addition, Member States have introduced new measures to reduce money laundering such as powers to oppose the execution of a transaction and increased powers for the control of travellers who import large sums of money. Council Decision of 17 December 2000 relative to the exchange of information between the Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) of the Member States provides a primary framework for the exchange of information between the FIUs of the Member States. 8 Member States utilise the FIU-Net as a means of exchanging information between FIUs. Individual Member States also exchange information with third country FIUs. This exchange of information often takes place under the auspices of signed Memoranda of Understanding which generally are developed in accordance with the principles of the Egmont Group. The Egmont Secure Web is also utilised as a secure communication network. Some Member States also refer to the 40 Recommendations of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force), the Council Framework Decision on money laundering, identifying, tracing, freezing and confiscation of criminal assets and the proceeds of crime and the Council of Europe Convention on laundering, search, seizure and confiscation of the proceeds of crime. 4.1.2.6 What type of training for customs and police does your country provide in view of combating the diversion of chemical precursors, including possibly the assistance of the Commission and EUROPOL? Law enforcement officers receive training in combating the diversion of precursors through stand alone courses or through courses related to combating synthetic drugs production and trafficking. Some Member States refer to the assistance provided by Europol in this regard. 4.2.1 Please describe the joint investigative units which have been established in your country between police, customs and other law enforcement agencies specifically responsible for tackling drug trafficking. Some Member States have permanent joint police/customs teams. Other law enforcement authorities may be represented on these teams. In other Member States joint police/customs investigations take place as the need arises. 4.2.2 Please describe the measures your country has taken, with the assistance of Europol where appropriate, to reinforce co-operation with other Member States against drug trafficking. In particular, please mention if any joint teams with other Member States have been established when dealing with drug trafficking between Member States. If no such teams have been established, please explain why this is the case. Co-operation between Member States against drug trafficking generally takes place through exchanges of information, joint investigations or law enforcement co-operation in border areas. Some Member States have established a joint police/customs team to combat drug trafficking on road and rail routes between them. 6 Member States (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK) together with Europol are involved in a European Joint Unit to combat serious criminal activity in the field of precursor chemical diversion. A number of Member States have transposed into national law the provisions of the Council Framework Decision on joint investigation teams and/or have ratified the EU Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters or have indicated that legislation in place already enables the setting up of such teams (Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the UK). However, joint investigation teams, as provided for in the Framework Decision or the Convention, dealing with drug trafficking between Member States have not been established. Some Member States are involved in discussions with regard to forming joint investigation teams and giving their police and judicial authorities additional, more far-reaching powers to operate on each other's territories. 4.2.3 Please describe the measures your country has taken to promote regional co-operation with other Member States affected by similar drug problems. A number of Member States (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and Spain) have created police and custom co-operation centres on their common borders. Regional systems of exchange of information have been established by, for example, a permanent liaison bureau and the appointment of joint superintendents. Police officers from one Member States participate in police officer meetings of another Member State (Belgium and the Netherlands). In addition, a number of Member States have adopted a co-ordinated regional approach to combating drug tourism (Belgium, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands). The Nordic Member States are part of a regional law enforcement co-operation known as PTN with a significant focus on combating drug-related crime. These Member States and Germany are also part of the Task Force on Organised Crime in the Baltic Sea Region. 4.2.5 In what way does your country promote new investigation techniques, research and documentation of drug related crime? Member States use investigation techniques such as controlled deliveries, undercover agents, simulated purchases in combating drug trafficking and drug related crime. Some Member States have at their disposal tools such as a specialist research centre, a national network of drug experts and a computerised system for the collection, development and analysis of data on operations against the illegal traffic in drugs. A number of Member States refer to research carried out or being carried out on drug-related crime. 5. International 5.1.3 During the reference period, which Candidate Countries has your country supported, with technical assistance and/or finance where necessary, in their efforts to counter drug abuse and drug trafficking? Almost all Member States have provided assistance to the candidate countries in their efforts to combat drug abuse and trafficking. This assistance has taken a number of forms such as: Participation in the PHARE programme and in particular in twinning projects under this programme; Organisation of study visits and seminars and provision of training to law enforcement officers; The signing of bilateral co-operation agreements in relation to internal security matters; Funding to the Council of Europe's Pompidou Group in the framework of training in drug demand reduction interventions provided to Central and Eastern European countries; Provision of financial assistance to drug related projects in candidate countries; and Provision of technical assistance and equipment. 5.1.5 Has your country implemented the pre-accession pact on organised crime and extended it to all applicant countries? A number of Member States refer to the utilisation of the PHARE programme in the implementation of the Pre-accession pact on organised crime and to the Council working group with responsibility for overseeing its implementation. In the context of the Pre-accession Pact contact points have been established. 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 How has your country co-ordinated its projects in third countries with other countries, multilateral and international organisations to enable their assessment? In this framework, has the co-operation with multilateral and international organisations been strengthened where this would increase the effectiveness of the actions carried out? Member States provide drug-related assistance to third countries on a bilateral basis and/or through the UNODC. Some Member States (Austria, France, Germany, Sweden, and the UK) indicate that they co-ordinate their bilateral projects with other Member States, multilateral and international organisations. A number of Member States refer to the provision of information to the Commission on drug-related assistance to third countries. The Dublin Group and the "major donors group" of the UNODC are cited as primary mechanisms for co-ordination and for strengthening co-operation with multilateral and international institutions. In this regard Member States also refer to their membership of or observer status to the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs, the Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe, CICAD and the work of the Paris Pact initiative. In the context of co-operation with Latin America and the Caribbean some Member States refer to the Co-ordination and Co-operation Mechanism on Drugs between the EU, Latin America and the Caribbean. 5.2.4 What resources have been made available for third countries for the implementation of programmes and projects for supply reduction and demand reduction? In what way have the projects undertaken been reported to the Horizontal Drugs Group of the Council? Many Member States provide financial assistance to demand reduction and/or supply reduction projects in third countries. Most of these countries indicate that the Commission and the Council's Horizontal Drugs Group are kept informed of their drug-related assistance to third countries. 5.2.5 Please describe in what way, in relations with non-candidate and non-European countries, all relevant Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) instruments take full account of the aims of the EU-Drug Strategy. A number of Member States (Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and the UK) affirm that in their relations with non-candidate and non-European countries in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy they take account of the objectives of the EU Drugs Strategy. 5.2.6 Has your country drawn up an action plan on drugs co-operation with North Africa and implemented fully the action plans on Latin America and the Caribbean and Central Asia? No Member State has drawn up an action plan on drugs with North Africa. With regard to the implementation of the plans with Latin America and the Caribbean and Central Asia, Member States refer to the training, technical and financial assistance they provide and law enforcement operational co-operation. 5.2.7 Please describe the measures, if any, your country has taken to help non-EU countries and regions to develop their anti-money laundering systems A number of Member States refer to co-operation with non-EU countries to develop and improve anti-money laundering systems under the auspices of the Egmont Group (Belgium, France, and Greece) and to participation in the work of the Council of Europe's anti-money laundering programme PC-R-EV recently renamed Moneyval (Belgium and the Netherlands). Member States also refer to participation in the PHARE anti-money laundering programme and in initiatives of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force). Other assistance provided by Member States include study visits by/to non-EU Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs), participation in IMF and World Bank evaluations, financial support and observer status in FATF regional bodies. 5.2.8 Please describe the tools used to support the development of a common international set of indicators in the field of demand reduction and to promote a common standard for national reporting to international organisations Many Member States refer to their participation in the work of the EMCDDA in the development of a common international set of indicators in the demand reduction field. Member States also refer to the work of the Pompidou Group and the UN and to all of these bodies in the context of promoting a common standard for national reporting to international organisations. 5.2.9 Please describe the measures used by your country to integrate drugs as a cross-sectional issue into supranational co-operation schemes (particularly with the developing countries) Member States affirm that they see drugs as being a cross-sectional issue and stress the importance of dialogue on this issue within bodies such as the Dublin Group and the UN. ANNEX 2 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU ACTION PLAN ON DRUGS 2000-2004: FOLLOW-UP TABLE FOR THE COMMISSION, THE EMCDDA AND EUROPOL [37] +++++ TABLE +++++ ANNEX 3 Instruments of the European Union in the field of drugs (2000 - 2004). A. Instruments of the EU adopted during the period 1 January 2000 - 31 July 2004. - Council Resolution on cannabis. CORDROGUE 59 - 07.07.2004 - Progress report in relation to the Implementation Plans on Demand and Supply Reduction of Drugs and the Supply of Synthetic drugs - CORDROGUE 43 - 14.06.2004 - Council Recommendation regarding guidelines for taking samples of seized drugs. CORDROGUE 26 - 30.03.2004 - Regulation (EC) no 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors. OJ L 47, 18.02.2004 - P.1 -Council Decision 2003/847/JHA of 27 November 2003 concerning control measures and criminal sanctions in respect of the new synthetic drugs 2C-I, 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7 and TMA-2,OJ L 321,06.12.2003 - P. 64 - Resolution of the Council on combating the impact of psychoactive substances use on road accidents. CORDROGUE 97 - 13.11.2003 - Council resolution on the posting of liaison officers with particular expertise in drugs to Albania. CORDROGUE 95 - 13.11.2003 - Council Resolution of 17 December 2003 on training for drug law enforcement officers. CORDROGUE 96 - 12.11.2003 - Council Resolution on the importance of the role of the families in preventing drug abuse by adolescents. CORDROGUE 94 - 12.11.2003 - Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on coordination on drugs in the European Union. COM/2003/0681 final - 12.11.2003 - Resolution of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, for the development of education curricula on substance misuse disorders for medical and other care students and professionals and their inclusion in university studies. CORDROGUE 57 - 19.06.2003 - Resolution of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council for the integration of the effective management (diagnosis, brief intervention, referrals) and medically assisted treatment for opiate dependent patients within the national health care. CORDROGUE 56 - 19.06.2003 - Council Recommendation of 18 June 2003 on the prevention and reduction of health-related harm associated with drug dependence. OJ L 165, 03.07.2003 P.31 - Resolution of the Council on the importance of early intervention to prevent drug dependence and drug related harm among young people using drugs. CORDROGUE 58 - 13.06.2003 - Implementation paper on demand and supply reduction to deliver the EU Drugs Action Plan. CORDROGUE 40 - 27.05.2003 - Action Plan on Drugs between the EU and Countries of Western Balkans and Candidate Countries (Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey). CORDROGUE 3 REV 2 - 23.05.2003 - Agreement between the European Community and the Turkish Republic on precursors and chemical substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances. OJ L 064, 07.03.2003 - P.30 - Resolution of the Representatives of the Member States meeting within the Council on the treatment of drug abusers in prisons. CORDROGUE 54 REV 4 - 28.11. 2002 - Implementation plan on actions to be taken in regard to the supply of synthetic drugs. CORDROGUE 81 REV 2 - 26.11.2002 - Council Resolution on the generic classification of specific groups of new synthetic drugs. CORDROGUE 64 REV 4 - 11.11. 2002 - Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European parliament on the mid-term evaluation of the EU action plan on drugs. (2000-2004). COM(2002)599, 04.11.2002 - Council Decision of 30 September 2002 adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area (2002-2006). OJ L 232, 29.10.2002 - P.1 - Decision No 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003-2008). OJ L 271, 09.10.2002 - P.1 - Action plan on Drugs between the EU and Central Asian republics (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan). CORDROGUE 78 - 25.09.2002 - Council Decision of 22 July 2002 establishing a framework programme on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (AGIS). OJ L 203, 01.08.2002 - P.5 - Commission Regulation (EC) No 1232/2002 of 9 July 2002 replacing the Annex to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and amending Regulation (EEC) No 3769/92 . OJ L 180, 10.07.2002 - P.5 - Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on joint investigation teams. OJ L 162, 20.06.2002 - P.1 - Council Regulation (EC) No 988/2002 of 3 June 2002 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substancesOJ L 151, 11.06.2002 - P.1 - Resolution of the Council on the incorporation of drug prevention in school curricula. CORDROGUE 4 REV 3 - 08.05. 2002 - Council Recommendation of 25 April 2002 on improving investigation methods in the fight against organised crime linked to organised drug trafficking: simultaneous investigations into drug trafficking by criminal organisations and their finances/assets. OJ C 114, 15.05.2002 - P.1 - Council Recommendation of 25 April 2002 on the need to enhance cooperation and exchanges of information between the various operational units specialising in combating trafficking in precursors in the Member States of the European Union. OJ C 114, 15.05.2002 - P.3 - Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Member States on the prevention of the recreational use of drugs. CORDROGUE 2 REV 3 - 15.04. 2002 - Council Decision of 28 February 2002 concerning control measures and criminal sanctions in respect of the new synthetic drug PMMA. OJ L 063, 06.03.2002 - P. 14 - Joint declaration on drugs of the Ministers of the European Union in association with the European Commission, and the Candidate Countries. CORDROGUE 7 REV 2 - 15.02 2002 - Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004. OJ L 346, 31.12.2001- P.1 - Directive 2001/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 amending Council Directive 91/308/EEC on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering - Commission Declaration. OJ L 344, 28.12.2001- P. 76 - Council Resolution on the implementation of the five key epidemiological indicators on drugs, developed by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). CORDROGUE 67- 15.11.2001 - Council Act of 16 October 2001 establishing, in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, the Protocol to the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union.OJ C 326, 21.11.2001 - P.1 - Council Decision of 28 June 2001 establishing a programme of incentives and exchanges, training and cooperation for the prevention of crime (Hippokrates). OJ L 186, 07.07.2001 - P. 11 - Council Framework Decision of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime. OJ L 182, 05.07.2001 - P. 1 - Council Decision of 28 June 2001 establishing a second phase of incentives, exchanges, training and cooperation for law enforcement authorities (Oisin II) - OJ L 186, 07.07.2001 - P.4 - Council Regulation (EC) No 1116/2001 of 5 June 2001 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.O J L 153, 08.06.2001 - P. 4 - Council Decision of 28 May 2001 setting up a European crime prevention network. OJ L 153, 08.06.2001 - P.1 - Council Decision of 28 May 2001 on the transmission of samples of controlled substances.O J L 150, 06.06.2001 - P.1 - Council recommendation on the alignment of law enforcement drug and diverted precursors statistics. STUP 26 - 30.10.2001 and STUP 29-13.11.2001 - Council conclusions on networking information on emerging trends and patterns in drug abuse and poly-drug use and the associated risks. O J C 017, 19.01.2001 - P. 2 - Initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a JHA Council Decision establishing a system of special forensic profiling analysis of synthetic drugs. OJ C 10, 12.01.2001 - P. 1 - Council Decision of 17 October 2000 concerning arrangements for cooperation between financial intelligence units of the Member States in respect of exchanging information. OJ L 271, 24.10.2000 - P. 4 - Council Regulation (EC) No 2220/2000 of 28 September 2000 amending Regulation (EEC) No 302/93 on the establishment of a European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. OJ L 253, 07.10.2000 - P.1 - Council Decision of 28 September 2000 on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on the participation of Norway in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. OJ L 257, 11.10.2000 - P.23 - Commission Regulation (EC) No 1610/2000 of 24 July 2000 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3769/92 implementing and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. JO L 185, 25.07.2000 - P.30 - Convention established by the Council in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union. JO C 197, 12.07.2000 - P-3 B. Pending EU instruments. - Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing. COM (2004) 448 - 30.06.2004 - Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors". UD 81, CORDROGUE, COMER 120, 30.06.2004 - Proposal for a Council Regulation on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (recast). COM (2003) 808 (01) - 19.12.2003 - Draft Council Recommendation on the monitoring of the chemical composition of narcotics, in order to improve investigation results in the fight against transnational drug trafficking within the European Union. CORDROGUE 82-13.11.2003 - Proposal for a Council Decision on the information exchange, risk-assessment and the control on new narcotic drugs and new synthetic drugs. COM(2003)0560 final - 03.10.2003. - Initiative by the Kingdom of Spain for the conclusion of a Convention on the suppression by customs administrations of illicit drug trafficking on the high seas. JO C 45, 19.02.2002 - Proposal for a Council framework Decision laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking. COM (001) 259 final 23.05.2001. OJ C 304 E, 30.10.2001 - P.172 [1] KOM(1999)239 v konečnom znení z 26.5.1999. [2] Cordrogue 64, Rev. 3, 12555/3/99, 1.12.1999. [3] Cordrogue 32, 9283/00, 7.6.2000. [4] KOM(2002)599 v konečnom znení, 4.11.2002. [5] Pokiaľ nie je uvedené inak, odkazy na členské štáty sú odkazmi na bývalých 15 členských štátov. [6] Publikácie sú k dispozícii na www.emcdda.eu-.int alebo na www.europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home a www.europa.eu.int/comm/taxation_customs [7] K dispozícii na www.emcdda.eu.int. [8] Pozri www.europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home. [9] Crimorg 43, Rev 3, 9615/3/03. [10] Cordrogue 81, Rev 2, 12452/2/02. [11] Cordrogue 40, Rev 2, 8926/2/03. [12] Cordrogue 43, 10481/04. [13] 1. Rozsah a charakteristika užívania drog u bežného obyvateľstva 2. Prevaha problémového užívania drog 3. Záujem osôb užívajúcich drogy o liečenie 4. Počet úmrtí v súvislosti s drogami a úmrtnosť užívateľov drog a 5. Výskyt infekčných ochorení v súvislosti s drogami. [14] Ú. v. ES L 167, 25.06.1997, s. 1 [15] Ú. v. ES L 19, 22.1.1997, s. 25. [16] Ú. v. ES L 271, 9.10.2002, s. 1. [17] Ú. v. EÚ L 165, 03.07.2003, s. 31. [18] KOM(2003)311 v konečnom znení. [19] Cordrogue 97, 13/11/2003. [20] Smernica 91/308/EHS, Ú. v. ES L166, 28.06.1991, s. 77. [21] Smernica 2001/97/CE , Ú. v. ES L 344, 28.12.2001, s. 76. [22] Ú. v. ES L 162, 20.06.2002, s.1 [23] Ú. v. ES C197, 12.07.2000, s. 1 [24] Ú. v. ES C 24, 23.01.1998, s. 2 [25] Ú. v. ES C 316, 27.11.95, s. 34 [26] Porovnaj poznámku pod čiarou č. 21 [27] Ú. v. ES L 203, 01.08.2002, s. 5 [28] KOM (2001) 259 v konečnom znení [29] Ú. v. EÚ L 47, 18.02.2004, s. 1 [30] KOM(2004)244 v konečnom znení [31] KOM(2004)448, 30.06.04 [32] Ú. v. ES L 271, 24.10.2000, s. 4 [33] Stup 26 30.10.2001, Stup 29 13.11.01 [34] Pozri oddiel 2.2 [35] Ďalší výskum pozri v obraze a tematickej publikácii "Hlavné poučenia zo skúmania hodnotenia oblasti protidrogovej politiky v Európskej únii " na webovej stránke EMCDDA. [36] The AGIS programme (Framework programme on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters) started in 2003 and incorporates previous Title VI programmes, such as Falcone and OISIN. [37] Only the actions where the Commission, the EMCDDA and EUROPOL are directly involved are analysed.