EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0448
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 December 2003. # EVN AG and Wienstrom GmbH v Republik Österreich. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesvergabeamt - Austria. # Directive 93/36/EEC - Public supply contracts - Concept of the most economically advantageous tender - Award criterion giving preference to electricity produced from renewable energy sources - Directive 89/665/EEC - Public procurement review proceedings - Unlawful decisions - Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influence on the outcome of the tender procedure - Illegality of an award criterion - Obligation to cancel the invitation to tender. # Case C-448/01.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (šiesta komora) zo 4. decembra 2003.
EVN AG a Wienstrom GmbH proti Republik Österreich.
Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania Bundesvergabeamt - Rakúsko.
Verejné obstarávanie dodania tovaru.
Vec C-448/01.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (šiesta komora) zo 4. decembra 2003.
EVN AG a Wienstrom GmbH proti Republik Österreich.
Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania Bundesvergabeamt - Rakúsko.
Verejné obstarávanie dodania tovaru.
Vec C-448/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:651
«(Directive 93/36/EEC – Public supply contracts – Concept of the most economically advantageous tender – Award criterion giving preference to electricity produced from renewable energy sources – Directive 89/665/EEC – Public procurement review proceedings – Unlawful decisions – Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influence on the outcome of the tender procedure – Illegality of an award criterion – Obligation to cancel the invitation to tender)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Directive 93/36, Art. 26)
(Council Directive 89/665)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
4 December 2003 (1)
((Directive 93/36/EEC – Public supply contracts – Concept of the most economically advantageous tender – Award criterion giving preference to electricity produced from renewable energy sources – Directive 89/665/EEC – Public procurement review proceedings – Unlawful decisions – Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influence on the outcome of the tender procedure – Illegality of an award criterion – Obligation to cancel the invitation to tender))
In Case C-448/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that body between EVN AG, Wienstrom GmbHand
Republik Österreich, third parties: Stadtwerke Klagenfurt AG and Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG, on the interpretation of Article 26 of Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 1) and of Articles 1 and 2(1)(b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33), as amended by Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1),THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of EVN AG and Wienstrom GmbH, the Republik Österreich, the Austrian Government and the Commission at the hearing on 23 January 2003,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 27 February 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Bundesvergabeamt by order of 13 November 2001, hereby rules:
Skouris |
Gulmann |
Puissochet |
Schintgen |
Colneric |
|
R. Grass |
V. Skouris |
Registrar |
President |