This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C:2017:364:FULL
Official Journal of the European Union, C 364, 27 October 2017
Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene, C 364, 27 octombrie 2017
Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene, C 364, 27 octombrie 2017
|
ISSN 1977-1029 |
||
|
Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene |
C 364 |
|
|
||
|
Ediţia în limba română |
Comunicări şi informări |
Anul 60 |
|
Informarea nr. |
Cuprins |
Pagina |
|
|
II Comunicări |
|
|
|
COMUNICĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE |
|
|
|
Comisia Europeană |
|
|
2017/C 364/01 |
Nonopoziție la o concentrare notificată (Cazul M.8650 – LGP/CPA) ( 1 ) |
|
|
IV Informări |
|
|
|
INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE |
|
|
|
Comisia Europeană |
|
|
2017/C 364/02 |
||
|
2017/C 364/03 |
||
|
|
Autoritatea pentru partidele politice europene și fundațiile politice europene |
|
|
2017/C 364/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Text cu relevanță pentru SEE. |
|
RO |
|
II Comunicări
COMUNICĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE
Comisia Europeană
|
27.10.2017 |
RO |
Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene |
C 364/1 |
Nonopoziție la o concentrare notificată
(Cazul M.8650 – LGP/CPA)
(Text cu relevanță pentru SEE)
(2017/C 364/01)
La 20 octombrie 2017, Comisia a decis să nu se opună concentrării notificate menționate mai sus și să o declare compatibilă cu piața internă. Prezenta decizie se bazează pe articolul 6 alineatul (1) litera (b) din Regulamentul (CE) nr. 139/2004 al Consiliului (1). Textul integral al deciziei este disponibil doar în limba engleză și va fi făcut public după ce vor fi eliminate orice secrete de afaceri pe care le-ar putea conține. Va fi disponibil:
|
— |
pe site-ul internet al Direcției Generale Concurență din cadrul Comisiei, la secțiunea consacrată concentrărilor (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). Acest site internet oferă diverse facilități care permit identificarea deciziilor de concentrare individuale, inclusiv întreprinderea, numărul cazului, data și indexurile sectoriale; |
|
— |
în format electronic, pe site-ul internet EUR-Lex (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=ro), cu numărul de document 32017M8650. EUR-Lex permite accesul online la legislația europeană. |
IV Informări
INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE
Comisia Europeană
|
27.10.2017 |
RO |
Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene |
C 364/2 |
Rata de schimb a monedei euro (1)
26 octombrie 2017
(2017/C 364/02)
1 euro =
|
|
Moneda |
Rata de schimb |
|
USD |
dolar american |
1,1753 |
|
JPY |
yen japonez |
133,75 |
|
DKK |
coroana daneză |
7,4432 |
|
GBP |
lira sterlină |
0,89010 |
|
SEK |
coroana suedeză |
9,7218 |
|
CHF |
franc elvețian |
1,1678 |
|
ISK |
coroana islandeză |
|
|
NOK |
coroana norvegiană |
9,4865 |
|
BGN |
leva bulgărească |
1,9558 |
|
CZK |
coroana cehă |
25,589 |
|
HUF |
forint maghiar |
310,32 |
|
PLN |
zlot polonez |
4,2350 |
|
RON |
leu românesc nou |
4,5983 |
|
TRY |
lira turcească |
4,4338 |
|
AUD |
dolar australian |
1,5248 |
|
CAD |
dolar canadian |
1,5041 |
|
HKD |
dolar Hong Kong |
9,1701 |
|
NZD |
dolar neozeelandez |
1,7118 |
|
SGD |
dolar Singapore |
1,6010 |
|
KRW |
won sud-coreean |
1 320,41 |
|
ZAR |
rand sud-african |
16,7390 |
|
CNY |
yuan renminbi chinezesc |
7,8003 |
|
HRK |
kuna croată |
7,5155 |
|
IDR |
rupia indoneziană |
15 981,73 |
|
MYR |
ringgit Malaiezia |
4,9762 |
|
PHP |
peso Filipine |
60,939 |
|
RUB |
rubla rusească |
67,7597 |
|
THB |
baht thailandez |
38,973 |
|
BRL |
real brazilian |
3,8030 |
|
MXN |
peso mexican |
22,3684 |
|
INR |
rupie indiană |
76,2300 |
(1) Sursă: rata de schimb de referință publicată de către Banca Centrală Europeană.
|
27.10.2017 |
RO |
Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene |
C 364/3 |
DECIZIA COMISIEI
din 23 octombrie 2017
de notificare a Republicii Socialiste Vietnam cu privire la posibilitatea de a fi identificată ca țară terță necooperantă în ceea ce privește combaterea pescuitului ilegal, nedeclarat și nereglementat
(2017/C 364/03)
COMISIA EUROPEANĂ,
având în vedere Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene,
având în vedere Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1005/2008 al Consiliului din 29 septembrie 2008 de instituire a unui sistem comunitar pentru prevenirea, descurajarea și eliminarea pescuitului ilegal, nedeclarat și nereglementat, de modificare a Regulamentelor (CEE) nr. 2847/93, (CE) nr. 1936/2001 și (CE) nr. 601/2004 și de abrogare a Regulamentelor (CE) nr. 1093/94 și (CE) nr. 1447/1999 (1), în special articolul 32,
întrucât:
1. INTRODUCERE
|
(1) |
Regulamentul (CE) nr. 1005/2008 (denumit în continuare „Regulamentul INN”) instituie un sistem al Uniunii pentru prevenirea, descurajarea și eliminarea pescuitului ilegal, nedeclarat și nereglementat (INN). |
|
(2) |
Capitolul VI din Regulamentul INN definește procedura de identificare a țărilor terțe necooperante, demersurile referitoare la acele țări, stabilirea unei liste a țărilor respective, eliminarea de pe acea listă, publicarea listei respective și eventualele măsuri de urgență. |
|
(3) |
În conformitate cu articolul 31 din Regulamentul INN, Comisia trebuie să identifice țările terțe pe care le consideră necooperante în ceea ce privește combaterea pescuitului INN. O țară terță trebuie să fie identificată ca necooperantă dacă aceasta nu se achită de obligațiile care îi revin în temeiul dreptului internațional în calitate de stat de pavilion, stat portuar, stat de coastă sau stat de piață, și anume dacă nu ia măsuri de prevenire, descurajare și eliminare a activităților de pescuit INN. |
|
(4) |
Anterior identificării unor țări terțe ca necooperante în temeiul articolului 31 din Regulamentul INN, Comisia trebuie să notifice în prealabil țărilor terțe posibilitatea de a fi identificate ca țări necooperante, în conformitate cu articolul 32 din regulamentul respectiv. Această notificare are caracter preliminar. Notificarea trebuie să se bazeze pe criteriile prevăzute la articolul 31 din Regulamentul INN. De asemenea, Comisia trebuie să aibă în vedere toate demersurile prevăzute la articolul 32 din regulamentul menționat în ceea ce privește țările terțe notificate. În special, Comisia trebuie să includă în notificare informații privind faptele și motivele esențiale care stau la baza respectivei identificări și să ofere țărilor în cauză posibilitatea de a răspunde și de a furniza probe care să infirme identificarea sau, după caz, de a prezenta un plan de acțiune pentru ameliorarea situației și măsuri de remediere a acesteia. Comisia trebuie să acorde țărilor terțe notificate o perioadă de timp corespunzătoare pentru a răspunde la notificare și un termen rezonabil pentru a remedia situația. |
|
(5) |
Identificarea țărilor terțe necooperante în temeiul articolului 31 din Regulamentul INN trebuie să se bazeze pe examinarea tuturor informațiilor prevăzute la articolul 31 alineatul (2) din regulamentul menționat. |
|
(6) |
În conformitate cu articolul 33 din Regulamentul INN, Consiliul trebuie să stabilească o listă a țărilor terțe necooperante. Acelor țări li se aplică, printre altele, măsurile prevăzute la articolul 38 din Regulamentul INN. |
|
(7) |
În temeiul articolului 20 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul INN, acceptarea certificatelor de captură validate prezentate de țări terțe de pavilion face obiectul unei notificări din partea statului de pavilion în cauză către Comisie cu privire la convențiile pentru punerea în aplicare, controlul și asigurarea respectării legilor, a reglementărilor și a măsurilor de conservare și gestionare pe care trebuie să le respecte navele de pescuit ale respectivei țări. |
|
(8) |
În conformitate cu articolul 20 alineatul (4) din Regulamentul INN, Comisia trebuie să coopereze pe plan administrativ cu țările terțe în domenii legate de punerea în aplicare a dispozițiilor respectivului regulament referitoare la certificarea capturilor. |
2. PROCEDURA ÎN CEEA CE PRIVEȘTE REPUBLICA SOCIALISTĂ VIETNAM
|
(9) |
Notificarea Republicii Socialiste Vietnam (denumită în continuare „Vietnam”) ca stat de pavilion a fost primită de Comisie în conformitate cu articolul 20 din Regulamentul INN la data de 27 octombrie 2009. |
|
(10) |
În urma acestei notificări, Comisia a inițiat un proces de cooperare administrativă cu autoritățile din Vietnam, astfel cum se prevede la articolul 20 alineatul (4) din Regulamentul INN. Această cooperare a vizat aspecte legate de dispozițiile naționale în vigoare pentru verificarea certificatelor de captură și punerea în aplicare, controlul și asigurarea respectării legilor, a reglementărilor și a măsurilor de conservare și gestionare care trebuie să fie respectate de către navele de pescuit vietnameze. Cooperarea a implicat un schimb de observații scrise și verbale, precum și patru vizite în Vietnam în perioadele 17-21 septembrie 2012, 26-30 noiembrie 2012, 21-24 iunie 2016 și 15-19 mai 2017, cu ocazia cărora Comisia a căutat și a verificat toate informațiile pe care le-a considerat necesare, referitoare la măsurile luate de Vietnam pentru îndeplinirea obligațiilor sale de combatere a pescuitului INN. |
|
(11) |
Vietnamul este parte necontractantă cooperantă la Comisia pentru pescuitul în Oceanul Pacific de Vest și Central (WCPFC – Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission). Vietnamul a ratificat Convenția Națiunilor Unite din 1982 asupra dreptului mării (UNCLOS) (2). |
|
(12) |
Pentru a evalua respectarea de către Vietnam a obligațiilor internaționale care îi revin în calitate de stat de pavilion, stat portuar, stat de coastă sau stat de piață, prevăzute în acordurile internaționale menționate la considerentul 11 și stabilite de organizațiile regionale de gestionare a pescuitului (ORGP) relevante, Comisia a căutat, cules și analizat toate informațiile necesare în scopul acestui exercițiu. |
3. POSIBILITATEA CA VIETNAMUL SĂ FIE IDENTIFICAT CA ȚARĂ TERȚĂ NECOOPERANTĂ
|
(13) |
În temeiul articolului 31 alineatul (3) din Regulamentul INN, Comisia a analizat obligațiile care revin Vietnamului în calitate de stat de pavilion, stat portuar, stat de coastă sau stat de piață. În scopul acestei examinări, Comisia a ținut seama de criteriile enumerate la articolul 31 alineatele (4)-(7) din Regulamentul INN. |
3.1. Măsuri luate în ceea ce privește recurența activităților de pescuit INN și a fluxurilor comerciale INN [articolul 31 alineatul (4) din Regulamentul INN]
|
(14) |
În conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (4) litera (a), Comisia a analizat măsurile luate de Vietnam în ceea ce privește activitățile de pescuit INN repetate desfășurate sau sprijinite de nave de pescuit care arborează pavilionul său sau de resortisanții săi sau de nave de pescuit care operează în apele sale maritime sau utilizează porturile sale. |
|
(15) |
Pe baza informațiilor obținute din confirmările scrise ale statelor de coastă terțe în cauză, Comisia a stabilit că, în perioada 2015-2017, cel puțin opt nave aflate sub pavilion vietnamez au comis încălcări grave legate de pescuitul INN în zona economică exclusivă a țărilor vecine și în apele arhipelagice ale statelor insulare mici în curs de dezvoltare din zona Pacificului Central și de Vest. |
|
(16) |
Pe baza dovezilor obținute, se consideră că aceste nave aflate sub pavilion vietnamez au comis următoarele încălcări grave ale măsurilor de conservare și gestionare instituite de statele de coastă în cauză, în zonele de pescuit situate în ape aflate sub jurisdicția lor națională. Navele aflate sub pavilion vietnamez au pescuit fără a deține o licență, o autorizație sau un permis valabil emis de statul de pavilion și de statul de coastă corespunzător, au obstrucționat activitatea funcționarilor statului de coastă în exercitarea sarcinilor acestora privind inspectarea în vederea stabilirii conformității cu măsurile de conservare și gestionare aplicabile, inclusiv în ceea ce privește speciile care fac obiectul unei interdicții complete de pescuit, cum ar fi castraveții de mare și peștii de recif. În timp ce statele de coastă în cauză au raportat la timp autorităților din Vietnam activitățile ilegale efectuate de nave vietnameze, autoritățile respective nu au furnizat sprijin în vederea urmăririi în justiție a cazurilor și a sancționării resortisanților vietnamezi arestați. Toate probele obținute au fost prezentate autorităților vietnameze în timpul vizitei din perioada 15-19 mai 2017. |
|
(17) |
Valoarea ecologică a speciilor vizate și protecția specială oferită de măsurile de conservare și gestionare ale statelor de coastă prin intermediul unor interdicții de pescuit pentru aceste specii reprezintă indicii suplimentare ale gravității încălcărilor săvârșite. |
|
(18) |
Nerespectarea cerințelor legale impuse de statele de coastă pentru stabilirea unor perioade în timpul cărora este interzis pescuitul de castraveți de mare este deosebit de dăunătoare pentru sustenabilitatea resurselor piscicole din statele de coastă în curs de dezvoltare vizate și afectează traiul populațiilor locale. |
|
(19) |
Comisia a considerat că modelul comportamental al acestor nave sub pavilion vietnamez ar trebui luat în considerare pentru stabilirea gravității deosebite a faptelor. În această privință, comportamentul necooperant repetat al navelor vietnameze a condus la agravarea încălcărilor comise. |
|
(20) |
Pe baza informațiilor colectate, Comisia a concluzionat că Vietnamul nu și-a îndeplinit responsabilitățile care îi revin în calitate de stat de pavilion de a-și împiedica flota să se angajeze în activități de pescuit INN în marea liberă sau în apele țărilor terțe. Această situație înseamnă nerespectarea articolului 94 alineatele (1) și (2) din UNCLOS, care prevede că fiecare stat trebuie să-și exercite în mod eficace jurisdicția și controlul asupra navelor care arborează pavilionul său. De asemenea, ea contravine cerințelor de la punctul 24 al Planului internațional de acțiune pentru prevenirea, descurajarea și eliminarea pescuitului ilegal, nedeclarat și nereglementat (PIA INN) al Organizației Națiunilor Unite pentru Alimentație și Agricultură (FAO) (3), care prevede obligația de a efectua activități cuprinzătoare și eficace de control al activităților de pescuit. Comportamentul resortisanților vietnamezi responsabili pentru activitățile flotei respective reprezintă, de asemenea, o încălcare a articolului 62 alineatul (4) din UNCLOS, care prevede că resortisanții altor state care pescuiesc în zona economică exclusivă se conformează măsurilor de conservare și celorlalte clauze și condiții stabilite în legile și reglementările statului de coastă. În plus, lipsa manifestă de cooperare a Vietnamului cu autoritățile statelor de coastă în cauză a afectat capacitatea acestora de a adopta măsuri eficace de asigurare a respectării legii. |
|
(21) |
În temeiul articolului 31 alineatul (4) litera (b) din Regulamentul INN, Comisia a examinat măsurile adoptate de Vietnam cu privire la accesul pe piața sa al produselor pescărești provenite din pescuitul INN. |
|
(22) |
Din motivele descrise mai jos și în secțiunea 3.2, cadrul juridic din Vietnam în ceea ce privește gestionarea pescuitului, bazat în special pe Legea pescuitului din 2003 și pe Decretul nr. 103/2013/ND-CP privind sancțiunile administrative aferente activităților de pescuit, nu pare să stabilească măsuri pentru a controla eficient debarcările în porturile din Vietnam a peștelui și a produselor pescărești provenite de la nave de pescuit care arborează pavilionul Vietnamului și de la navele din țări terțe. |
|
(23) |
Comisia a analizat documentația și alte informații legate de procedurile de monitorizare și control aplicabile atât peștelui, cât și produselor pescărești provenite din activitățile de pescuit ale navelor de pescuit care arborează pavilionul Vietnamului, precum și peștelui și produselor pescărești importate în Vietnam. În urma acestei evaluări, Comisia consideră că Vietnamul nu poate asigura faptul că peștele și produsele pescărești care intră pe piața sa și în întreprinderile sale de prelucrare, prin porturile naționale, nu provin din pescuitul INN. Autoritățile din Vietnam nu au putut demonstra că dispun de toate informațiile necesare pentru a atesta legalitatea importurilor și a produselor prelucrate destinate Uniunii și pieței acesteia. |
|
(24) |
La 13 ianuarie 2016, un lot de 179 de tone de cod antarctic a fost debarcat de pe nava Asian Warrior în portul Haiphong din Vietnam. Această navă, cunoscută și sub denumirile Kunlun și Taishan, s-a aflat pe lista navelor de pescuit INN a Comisiei pentru conservarea faunei și florei marine din Antarctica (CCAMLR) începând din 2013 și face obiectul unei Note violet a Interpolului (Interpol Purple Notice) din 13 ianuarie 2015. În conformitate cu informațiile furnizate de autoritățile vietnameze, capturile au fost confiscate și introduse pe piață. |
|
(25) |
Pe baza informațiilor preluate de Comisie în iunie 2017, un operator economic a încercat să vândă Uniunii Europene un lot de 320 de tone de cod antarctic stocat în Vietnam. Pe baza informațiilor disponibile, există indicații că produsele în cauză au fost capturate în subzonele 88.1 și 88.2 din zona acoperită de CCMALR după închiderea sezonului de pescuit pentru această specie în zonele respective. |
|
(26) |
Autoritățile vietnameze nu au fost în măsură să furnizeze informații substanțiale care să demonstreze că s-au luat măsurile corective necesare pentru a preveni intrarea pe teritoriul lor a codului antarctic provenit din activități de pescuit INN. Această situație nu este conformă cu punctul 66 din PIA INN al FAO, care prevede ca statele ar trebui să ia toate măsurile necesare, în conformitate cu dreptul internațional, pentru a preveni comercializarea sau importul pe teritoriul lor al peștelui capturat de nave identificate de către organizațiile regionale de gestionare a pescuitului relevante ca fiind angajate în activități de pescuit INN. |
|
(27) |
În plus, ultima vizită efectuată în mai 2017 a relevat lipsa controlului de către autoritățile din domeniul pescuitului asupra debarcărilor de produse pescărești destinate prelucrării, comercializării și/sau exportului, de pe navele care arborează pavilionul unor state terțe. Așadar, Vietnamul nu ar fi în măsură să asigure trasabilitatea produselor pescărești și, prin urmare, pare că nu ia în considerare dispozițiile punctului 71 din PIA INN, care îndeamnă statele membre să ia măsuri pentru a îmbunătăți transparența propriilor piețe, cu scopul de a asigura trasabilitatea peștelui sau a produselor pescărești. |
|
(28) |
Pentru pregătirea vizitei din mai 2017, Agenția Europeană pentru Controlul Pescuitului (EFCA) a analizat un eșantion de certificate de captură și de declarații de prelucrare prezentate la frontierele Uniunii pentru transporturi provenind din Vietnam. Aceste certificate de captură și declarații de prelucrare au fost validate și aprobate de autoritățile vietnameze din domeniul pescuitului exclusiv pe baza informațiilor furnizate de operatori, fără verificări suplimentare. |
|
(29) |
Analiza certificatelor de captură a evidențiat o serie de incoerențe în ceea ce privește greutatea, specia și descrierea produsului, datele de validare și utilizarea unor modele învechite. În plus, reuniunile cu autoritățile competente care au avut loc în cursul vizitei efectuate în mai 2017 au arătat că activitățile navelor de pescuit nu sunt verificate în mod exhaustiv înainte de validarea certificatelor de captură. Prelucrarea produselor pentru care certificatele de captură conțin erori clar identificabile demonstrează că Vietnamul nu a cooperat cu alte state și cu organizațiile regionale de gestionare a pescuitului în vederea adoptării de măsuri corespunzătoare în materie de piață pentru a preveni, a descuraja sau a elimina pescuitul INN, astfel cum se specifică la punctele 68 și 72 din PIA INN. |
|
(30) |
În ceea ce privește declarațiile de prelucrare, analiza menționată la considerentul precedent, susținută de probe colectate în cursul vizitei efectuate în mai 2017, a scos în evidență lipsa controlului asupra importurilor de materii prime din pește și lipsa factorilor de conversie pentru a verifica dacă greutatea produsului prelucrat declarată de societatea exportatoare este în concordanță cu greutatea materiei prime disponibile și cu tipul de prelucrare efectuată în unitatea de prelucrare în cauză. |
|
(31) |
Informațiile descrise în această secțiune demonstrează că produsele pescărești prelucrate în Vietnam sau comercializate prin intermediul acestei țări nu respectă normele referitoare la practicile post-capturare sustenabile descrise la articolul 11 din Codul de conduită al FAO. Mai mult, Vietnamul nu a reușit să impună norme care să asigure o cooperare adecvată cu țările terțe de pavilion în ceea ce privește peștele și produsele pescărești provenite din activitățile lor de pescuit, în conformitate cu măsurile care asigură transparența și trasabilitatea, în ansamblul pieței, a produselor pescărești importate, astfel cum se prevede la punctele 67-69 și 71-72 din PIA INN. |
|
(32) |
Având în vedere considerațiile expuse în prezenta secțiune și pe baza tuturor elementelor concrete colectate de Comisie și a tuturor declarațiilor făcute de autoritățile competente din Vietnam, s-a putut stabili, în conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (3) și cu articolul 31 alineatul (4) literele (a) și (b) din Regulamentul INN, că Vietnamul nu s-a achitat de obligațiile care îi revin în temeiul dreptului internațional în calitate de stat de pavilion, stat portuar, stat de coastă sau stat de piață în ceea ce privește navele implicate în pescuitul INN și pescuitul INN desfășurat sau sprijinit de nave de pescuit care arborează pavilionul său sau de resortisanții săi și nu a luat suficiente măsuri pentru a preveni accesul pe piața sa al produselor pescărești provenite din pescuitul INN. |
3.2. Nerespectarea obligațiilor legate de cooperare și de aplicare a legii [articolul 31 alineatul (5) din Regulamentul INN]
|
(33) |
În conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (5) litera (a) din Regulamentul INN, Comisia a analizat colaborarea sa cu Vietnamul pentru a stabili dacă această țară a cooperat în mod corespunzător răspunzând la întrebări, oferind feedback sau investigând aspectele legate de activitățile de pescuit INN și de activitățile conexe. |
|
(34) |
Cu toate că autoritățile din Vietnam au fost, în general, cooperante, răspunzând și oferind feedback atunci când li s-au solicitat informații, fiabilitatea și corectitudinea răspunsurilor a fost subminată de cadrul juridic depășit, care nu pare să fie aliniat la obligațiile care îi revin în temeiul dreptului internațional, precum și de sistemele deficitare de monitorizare, control și supraveghere descrise în considerentele 42 și 43. |
|
(35) |
Legea pescuitului din 2003 nu obligă navele de pescuit să își raporteze capturile prin intermediul unor jurnale de bord sau să depună o declarație de debarcare. În acest sens, Vietnamul nu și-a îndeplinit responsabilitățile, în calitate de stat de coastă, de a asigura utilizarea optimă a resurselor piscicole din zona sa economică exclusivă în funcție de factorii științifici, de mediu și economici, astfel cum se prevede la articolele 61 și 62 din UNCLOS. |
|
(36) |
De asemenea, Legea pescuitului din 2003 nu vizează activitățile de pescuit desfășurate de navele și de resortisanții vietnamezi în marea liberă și în apele statelor terțe. Această lacună în domeniul de aplicare a Legii pescuitului în ceea ce privește activitățile de pescuit desfășurate dincolo de zona economică exclusivă a Vietnamului subminează capacitatea autorităților competente de a preveni activitățile de pescuit INN în aceste zone. |
|
(37) |
Cadrul juridic vietnamez prevede doar măsuri limitate de conservare și gestionare în apele teritoriale. Dispozițiile legale naționale și sistemele de control instituite pentru a asigura conformitatea cu măsurile de conservare și gestionare par să fie insuficiente. Această situație constituie o încălcare a articolului 61 alineatul (2) din UNCLOS, care prevede că statele de coastă trebuie să se asigure, prin intermediul unor măsuri de conservare și gestionare adecvate, că menținerea resurselor biologice din zona economică exclusivă nu este amenințată de supraexploatare. |
|
(38) |
În conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (5) litera (b), Comisia a analizat măsurile existente de asigurare a respectării legislației care vizează prevenirea, descurajarea și eliminarea activităților de pescuit INN în Vietnam. |
|
(39) |
Actualul sistem de sancționare este stabilit prin Decretul nr. 103/2013/ND-CP privind sancțiunile administrative legate de activitățile de pescuit. Cu toate acestea, definițiile activităților de pescuit INN și ale încălcărilor grave incluse în Legea pescuitului și în decretul menționat anterior nu sunt în conformitate cu dreptul internațional. Așadar, în mod evident nivelul sancțiunilor prevăzute în cadrul juridic nu reușește să asigure caracterul disuasiv al sistemului de sancțiuni și nu reflectă punctul 21 din PIA INN, care recomandă ca statele să se asigure că sancțiunile aplicabile pescuitului INN efectuat de nave și, în cea mai mare măsură posibilă, de resortisanți aflați sub jurisdicția lor, sunt suficient de severe pentru a-i priva pe autorii infracțiunilor de profiturile care rezultă din acest tip de pescuit. |
|
(40) |
În urma vizitei sale din iunie 2016, Comisia a subliniat aceste aspecte și a invitat autoritățile vietnameze să coopereze cu Comisia în această privință. În cele din urmă, autoritățile vietnameze au prezentat, în aprilie 2017, un proiect al unei noi legi privind pescuitul; cu toate acestea, noua lege nu ar asigura îndeplinirea, de către Vietnam, a obligațiilor sale internaționale. |
|
(41) |
În conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (5) litera (c), Comisia a analizat amploarea și gravitatea activităților de pescuit INN desfășurate de navele care arborează pavilionul vietnamez sau de navele de pescuit care operează în apele maritime sau în porturile vietnameze. |
|
(42) |
Vizitele efectuate de Comisie au arătat că Vietnamul nu dispune de mijloacele necesare pentru a asigura un control adecvat al navelor care arborează pavilionul său și pentru a garanta că nu se desfășoară activități de pescuit în marea liberă și în apele statelor terțe. Deși Vietnamul nu își autorizează navele să opereze în marea liberă și în apele statelor terțe, în realitate, astfel cum s-a detaliat în considerentele 14-19, aceste activități ilegale sunt încă desfășurate de nave vietnameze în apele statelor terțe (4). |
|
(43) |
În conformitate cu informațiile furnizate de către autoritățile vietnameze, flota de pescuit din Vietnam este compusă din 109 000 de nave, dintre care 33 000 își desfășoară activitatea în zona economică exclusivă a Vietnamului, la mai mult de 24 de mile marine de la linia de bază. Autoritățile vietnameze au recunoscut că doar 10 % din cele 33 000 de nave care își desfășoară activitatea la mai mult de 24 de mile marine de la linia de bază sunt echipate cu sistemul de monitorizare prin satelit a navelor (VMS) și că nu există nicio obligație juridică în ceea ce privește activarea acestui sistem. Ultima vizită la Centrul de monitorizare a pescuitului (CMP) din mai 2017 a arătat, de asemenea, că personalul cu atribuții de monitorizare, control și supraveghere nu era familiarizat cu instrumentele disponibile și că deficiențele fundamentale identificate deja în cursul vizitei anterioare din iunie 2016 nu erau soluționate. În plus, în timpul vizitei, potrivit localizării VMS afișate pe ecranele CMP, au fost identificate două nave de pescuit vietnameze în afara apelor Vietnamului, iar personalul CMP a recunoscut că nu a fost luată nicio măsură. Cerințele inadecvate referitoare la jurnalele de bord și absența unui sistem bazat pe risc în ceea ce privește inspecțiile în port și pe mare subminează și mai mult capacitatea autorităților de a controla activitățile maritime. |
|
(44) |
Faptele descrise în această secțiune indică faptul că, deși cadrul juridic în vigoare în domeniul pescuitului trebuie revizuit pentru a se garanta coerența dintre legislația națională și normele internaționale, Vietnamul nu a cooperat în mod eficient cu Comisia în ceea ce privește alinierea legislației la instrumentele juridice internaționale relevante. Această situație reprezintă o încălcare a articolului 94 din UNCLOS, conform căruia statul de pavilion își asumă jurisdicția în conformitate cu legislația internă pentru fiecare navă care arborează pavilionul său și pentru căpitanul, ofițerii și echipajul acesteia. De asemenea, Vietnamul pare să nu pună în aplicare recomandările de la punctul 24 din PIA INN, care îndeamnă statele de pavilion să asigure o monitorizare, un control și o supraveghere cuprinzătoare și eficace a pescuitului, de la capturare și prezentare la punctul de debarcare și până la destinația finală, inclusiv prin utilizarea la bordul navelor de pescuit a sistemelor de monitorizare prin satelit a navelor (VMS), în conformitate cu standardele naționale, regionale și internaționale relevante. |
|
(45) |
Având în vedere considerațiile expuse în prezenta secțiune și pe baza tuturor elementelor concrete colectate de Comisie, precum și a tuturor declarațiilor transmise de autoritățile vietnameze, s-a putut stabili că, în conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatele (3) și (5) din Regulamentul INN, Vietnamul nu și-a îndeplinit obligațiile care îi revin în temeiul dreptului internațional în ceea ce privește cooperarea și asigurarea respectării legii. |
3.3. Nerespectarea obligațiilor de punere în aplicare a normelor internaționale [articolul 31 alineatul (6) din Regulamentul INN]
|
(46) |
În conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (6) literele (a) și (b) din Regulamentul INN, Comisia a analizat ratificarea de către Vietnam a instrumentelor internaționale din domeniul pescuitului sau aderarea acestei țări la instrumentele menționate, precum și statutul său ca parte contractantă în cadrul organizațiilor regionale de gestionare a pescuitului sau acordul acestei țări de a pune în aplicare măsurile de conservare și gestionare adoptate de aceste organizații. |
|
(47) |
Vietnamul a ratificat UNCLOS în 1994 și este parte necontractantă cooperantă la WCPFC. |
|
(48) |
Cu excepția Convenției UNCLOS, Vietnamul nu a ratificat alte instrumente juridice internaționale legate de gestionarea pescuitului. Situația din Vietnam în ceea ce privește punerea în aplicare a instrumentelor internaționale nu este în conformitate cu recomandările de la punctul 11 din PIA INN, care îndeamnă statele să acorde prioritate ratificării, acceptării sau aderării la Acordul Națiunilor Unite pentru aplicarea prevederilor UNCLOS în legătură cu conservarea și gestionarea stocurilor de pești anadromi și a stocurilor de pești mari migratori (UNFSA), precum și la Acordul de conformitate al FAO. Totodată, ea contravine punctului 14 din PIA INN, care prevede obligația statelor de a implementa în totalitate și cu eficacitate Codul de conduită și planurile internaționale de acțiune aferente acestuia. |
|
(49) |
Vietnamul nu a ratificat Acordul FAO din 2009 privind măsurile de competența statului portului. Aceasta înseamnă, de asemenea, că, după cum se arată la considerentul (27), Vietnamul nu pune în aplicare nicio măsură de control portuar privind debarcările efectuate de pe nave de pescuit străine, în pofida cantităților importante de pește și produse pescărești care sunt importate în țară în vederea aprovizionării industriei prelucrătoare. |
|
(50) |
Cadrul juridic vietnamez și măsurile de asigurare a respectării legii par, de asemenea, să încalce cerințele de bază prevăzute la articolul 62 și la articolele 117-119 din UNCLOS, referitoare la utilizarea optimă a resurselor biologice, la obligația statelor de a adopta, în ceea ce îi privește pe resortisanții lor, măsuri de conservare a resurselor biologice din marea liberă, obligația de cooperare pentru conservarea și gestionarea resurselor biologice și obligația de a conserva resursele biologice din marea liberă. |
|
(51) |
În conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (6) litera (c), Comisia a analizat dacă Vietnamul ar fi putut fi implicat în acte sau omisiuni care ar fi putut să diminueze eficacitatea legislației și a reglementărilor aplicabile sau a măsurilor internaționale de gestionare și conservare. |
|
(52) |
Comisia remarcă faptul că în cadrul întrunirii anuale a CCAMLR Vietnamul a fost identificat ca parte necontractantă posibil implicată în capturarea, debarcarea și/sau comercializarea Dissostichus spp., dar care nu cooperează cu Sistemul de documentare a capturilor (CDS) implementat în 2000 pentru a urmări aceste specii de la punctul de debarcare pe tot parcursul ciclului comercial. |
|
(53) |
Având în vedere considerațiile expuse în prezenta secțiune și pe baza tuturor elementelor concrete colectate de Comisie, precum și a tuturor declarațiilor transmise de Vietnam, s-a putut stabili că, în conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatele (3) și (6) din Regulamentul INN, Vietnamul nu și-a îndeplinit sarcinile care îi revin în temeiul dreptului internațional în ceea ce privește normele, reglementările și măsurile de conservare și gestionare internaționale. |
3.4. Constrângeri specifice țărilor în curs de dezvoltare [articolul 31 alineatul (7) din Regulamentul INN]
|
(54) |
În conformitate cu indicele de dezvoltare umană al Organizației Națiunilor Unite (IDU al ONU) (5), Vietnamul a fost considerat o țară cu un grad mediu de dezvoltare umană, clasându-se în 2015 pe locul 115 din 188 de țări. |
|
(55) |
Luând în considerare poziția menționată mai sus în clasamentul bazat pe indicele IDU al ONU și observațiile din cursul vizitelor efectuate în perioada 2012-2017, nicio dovadă nu sugerează faptul că neîndeplinirea de către Vietnam a sarcinilor care îi revin în temeiul dreptului internațional este rezultatul unui nivel scăzut de dezvoltare. Nu există dovezi concrete care să coreleze deficiențele cadrului juridic în vigoare în domeniul pescuitului, ale sistemelor de monitorizare, de control, de supraveghere și de trasabilitate cu un grad insuficient de dezvoltare a capacității și a infrastructurii. Comisia a răspuns pozitiv la solicitarea depusă de Vietnam în mai 2017 pentru sprijin în contextul revizuirii cadrului juridic în domeniul pescuitului. |
|
(56) |
Având în vedere situația explicată în prezenta secțiune și pe baza tuturor elementelor concrete colectate de Comisie, precum și a tuturor declarațiilor transmise de această țară, s-a putut stabili că, în conformitate cu articolul 31 alineatul (7) din Regulamentul INN, stadiul de dezvoltare și performanța generală a Vietnamului în ceea ce privește gestionarea activităților de pescuit nu sunt afectate de nivelul său de dezvoltare. |
4. CONCLUZIE PRIVIND POSIBILA IDENTIFICARE CA ȚARĂ TERȚĂ NECOOPERANTĂ
|
(57) |
Având în vedere concluziile la care s-a ajuns cu privire la faptul că Vietnamul nu și-a îndeplinit sarcinile care îi revin în temeiul dreptului internațional în calitate de stat de pavilion, stat portuar, stat de coastă sau stat de piață și nu a luat măsuri pentru prevenirea, descurajarea și eliminarea pescuitului INN, în conformitate cu articolul 32 din Regulamentul INN, această țară ar trebui să fie notificată cu privire la posibilitatea de a fi identificată de către Comisie ca țară terță necooperantă în ceea ce privește combaterea pescuitului INN. |
|
(58) |
De asemenea, Comisia ar trebui să întreprindă toate demersurile prevăzute la articolul 32 din Regulamentul INN în ceea ce privește Vietnamul. În interesul unei bune administrări, ar trebui să se stabilească un termen în care această țară să poată răspunde în scris la notificare și să rectifice situația. |
|
(59) |
În afară de aceasta, ar trebui să se precizeze faptul că notificarea adresată Vietnamului cu privire la posibilitatea de a fi identificat ca țară pe care Comisia o consideră țară terță necooperantă în sensul prezentei decizii nu exclude și nici nu conduce automat la vreo acțiune ulterioară întreprinsă de Comisie sau de Consiliu în vederea identificării și stabilirii unei liste a țărilor terțe necooperante, |
DECIDE:
Articol unic
Vietnamul este notificat cu privire la posibilitatea de a fi identificat de Comisie ca țară terță necooperantă în ceea ce privește combaterea pescuitului ilegal, nedeclarat și nereglementat.
Adoptată la Bruxelles, 23 octombrie 2017.
Pentru Comisie
Karmenu VELLA
Membru al Comisiei
(1) JO L 286, 29.10.2008, p. 1.
(2) https://treaties.un.org/
(3) Planul internațional de acțiune pentru prevenirea, descurajarea și eliminarea pescuitului ilegal, nedeclarat și nereglementat, Organizația Națiunilor Unite pentru Alimentație și Agricultură, 2001.
(4) Activitățile ilegale ale așa-numitelor „ambarcațiuni albastre” vietnameze au fost acoperite pe larg de mass-media din regiunea Pacificului:
https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2016/03/29/australia-captures-vietnamese-vessels-suspected-of-iuu/
http://nationalpost.com/news/world/tiny-island-nation-of-palau-very-publicly-burns-vietnamese-boats-caught-fishing-illegally
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/mmea-detains-vietnamese-fishermen-for-illegal-fishing#UEtd7edz4ez9lRch.97
https://www.solomonstarnews.com/news/national/12655-blue-boats-seized
http://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/malaysia-detains-another-40-vietnamese-for-illegal-fishing-3616922.html
(5) Informații preluate de pe site-ul: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
Autoritatea pentru partidele politice europene și fundațiile politice europene
|
27.10.2017 |
RO EN |
Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene |
C 364/10 |
Decizia Autorității pentru partidele politice europene și fundațiile politice europene
din 20 iulie 2017
de înregistrare a Partidului Ecologist European
(Numai textul în limba engleză este autentic)
(2017/C 364/04)
AUTORITATEA PENTRU PARTIDELE POLITICE EUROPENE ȘI FUNDAȚIILE POLITICE EUROPENE,
având în vedere Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene,
având în vedere Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1141/2014 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 22 octombrie 2014 privind statutul și finanțarea partidelor politice europene și a fundațiilor politice europene (1), în special articolul 9,
având în vedere cererea primită din partea Partidului Ecologist European,
întrucât:
|
(1) |
Autoritatea pentru partidele politice europene și fundațiile politice europene („autoritatea”) a primit la 7 iunie 2017 din partea Partidului Ecologist European („solicitantul”), o cerere de înregistrare ca partid politic european, în conformitate cu articolul 8 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1141/2014, iar la 13 iunie 2017, 11 iulie 2017, 13 iulie 2017 și 18 iulie 2017 a primit informații suplimentare care completează această cerere. |
|
(2) |
Solicitantul a transmis documentele necesare care dovedesc faptul că acesta îndeplinește condițiile prevăzute la articolul 3 din Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1141/2014, inclusiv declarația oficială în forma stabilită în anexa la acest regulament, precum și statutul său, care conține dispozițiile obligatorii prevăzute la articolului 4 din regulamentul menționat. |
|
(3) |
Cererea de înregistrare este însoțită, de asemenea, de o declarație emisă de Anton Van Bael, notar, în conformitate cu articolul 15 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1141/2014, prin care se atestă faptul că sediul solicitantului se află în Belgia și că statutul său este conform cu legislația națională aplicabilă. |
|
(4) |
Solicitantul a transmis documente suplimentare în conformitate cu articolele 1 și 2 din Regulamentul delegat (UE, Euratom) 2015/2401 al Comisiei (2). |
|
(5) |
În conformitate cu articolul 9 din Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1141/2014, autoritatea a examinat cererea și documentele justificative transmise de solicitant și consideră că acesta îndeplinește condițiile de înregistrare stabilite la articolul 3 din regulamentul menționat și că statutul său conține dispozițiile obligatorii prevăzute la articolului 4 din regulament, |
ADOPTĂ PREZENTA DECIZIE:
Articolul 1
PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST EUROPEAN este înregistrat ca partid politic european.
Acesta dobândește personalitate juridică europeană la data publicării prezentei decizii în Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene.
Articolul 2
Prezenta decizie intră în vigoare la data notificării.
Articolul 3
Prezenta decizie se adresează următoarei entități:
|
Partidul Ecologist European |
|
Rue Wiertz/Wiertzstraat 31 |
|
1050 Bruxelles/Brussel |
|
BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
Adoptată la Bruxelles, 20 iulie 2017.
Pentru Autoritatea pentru partidele politice europene și fundațiile politice europene
Directorul
M. ADAM
(1) JO L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 1.
(2) Regulamentul delegat (UE, Euratom) 2015/2401 al Comisiei din 2 octombrie 2015 cu privire la conținutul și la funcționarea registrului de repertoriere a partidelor politice europene și a fundațiilor politice europene (JO L 333, 19.12.2015, p. 50).
ANEXĂ
STATUTES
of the
EUROPEAN GREEN PARTY
European Political Party (PPEU)
adopted at the EGP Council, 12.11.2011, Paris
amended at the EGP Council, 20-22 May 2016, Utrecht
amended at the EGP Council, 2-4 December 2016, Glasgow
amended at the EGP Council, 31 March 2017, Liverpool
Preamble
The European Green Party represents Green Parties from all over Europe, and we are part of the Global Green family. We stand proudly for sustainable development and respect of human rights, built on the values of environmental responsibility, equality, freedom, justice, diversity and peace. Greens face the challenges of the 21st century by seeking to shape society in an innovative way. We propose policies for social solidarity and coherence compatible with sound economic and financial governance and which guarantee sustainability within our changing societies. For us and for generations to come.
These Statutes replace and supersede the previous Statutes of the European Green Party published in the Moniteur Belge on 19/09/2013 .
Article 1
Definitions
|
1.1. |
‘Full Members’ means those members specified in Article 4.3.1. |
|
1.2. |
‘Members’ means the entire membership of the European Green Party as specified in Article 4. |
|
1.3. |
‘Allocated Votes’ means the total number of votes assigned at each Council meeting to Full Members, determined according to their size and other criteria under a formula detailed in the Rule Book, and to the Green Group in the European Parliament and the Federation of Young European Greens as specified in Article 5.3 and further detailed in the Rule Book. |
|
1.4. |
‘Rule Book’ means the detailed rules for the functioning, management and operations of the European Green Party and the composition of its bodies adopted in accordance with these Statutes. |
|
1.5. |
‘Europe’ means the territory within the outer borders set by the Council of Europe. |
|
1.6. |
‘Parties’ means political parties registered or recognised as such in their home country. |
Article 2
Name, Logo and Seat
|
2.1. |
Through the present statutes the Full Members set up a European Political Party (Parti Politique Européen, PPEU), governed by the dispositions of Title III and IIIter of the Belgian law of 27 June 1921 on non-profit associations, foundations and European political parties and foundations. |
|
2.2. |
The Full Members form the European Political Party ‘European Green Party’, also called ‘the European Greens’. The name may be abbreviated as necessary to ‘EGP’. |
|
2.3. |
The logo of the European Green Party is a green rectangle with a stylized sunflower — consisting of twelve yellow petals – slightly tilted to the right, and with the words ‘European Green Party’ in white letters (font: Jaldi) positioned on the right of it.
Alternatively, the words ‘European Greens’ can be used. For official documents, the logo with ‘European Green Party’ will be used.
|
|
2.4. |
The seat of the European Green Party is situated at rue Wiertz 31, in 1050 Brussels, Belgium. |
|
2.5. |
The Committee may move the seat anywhere in Belgium by simple majority vote. The move must be published in the Moniteur Belge in accordance with the Belgian law. |
|
2.6. |
The European Green Party, acting through the Committee, shall keep detailed financial accounts and shall report at least once a year to the Full Members on the state of the finances. The financial year of the organisation shall be from 1st January to 31st December. |
Article 3
Aims and Objectives
The European Green Party
|
3.1. |
is a European political party within the terms of EU Regulation (EC) No 1141/2014 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding, |
|
3.2. |
takes as its principles the Charter of the European Greens (further described as the Green Charter) annexed hereto (Annex A), |
|
3.3. |
is open to political parties and other groups with a green agenda, from within and outside the European Union, which can subscribe to the Green Charter and which fulfil the membership criteria as laid down in these Statutes and further elaborated in the Rule Book, |
|
3.4. |
stimulates and organises initiatives and activities on a European level in order to accomplish a common green political agenda and, to ensure close and permanent cooperation among all its Members, contributes to forming European awareness and seeks to express the political will of the citizens of the European Union as well as to realise the full potential of green political representation at all political levels, |
|
3.5. |
works in close cooperation with the Green Group in the European Parliament (GGEP), the Green European Foundation (GEF), and the Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG), |
|
3.6. |
acts as the European partner within the structure of the Global Greens movement and subscribes to the Global Greens Charter annexed hereto (Annex C). |
|
3.7. |
applies the principle of gender-balance in all its elected and appointed bodies and external representation. |
Article 4
Membership
|
4.1. |
The European Green Party consists of Green parties and is open to green organisations and movements. |
|
4.2. |
Parties from within Europe can be accepted as Full or Candidate Members. Associate Members may be from outside these borders. |
|
4.3. |
There are four membership categories:
|
|
4.4. |
The admission of Members and any subsequent suspension or withdrawal of Membership shall be decided by the Council and requires in each case a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes.
|
|
4.5. |
Rights and Duties of the Members
|
Article 5
Relations with the Green Group in the European Parliament (‘GGEP’), the Federation of Young European Greens (‘FYEG’), the Green European Foundation (‘GEF’) and the Global Greens (‘GG’)
|
5.1. |
The European Green Party is exclusively represented in the European Parliament by the GGEP or its successors and the GGEP in turn represents the special category (MEP) members within the EGP. |
|
5.2. |
The European Green Party has as its youth organisation the Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG). |
|
5.3. |
Both the GGEP and the FYEG are entitled to appoint delegates to meetings of the European Green Party, including Council meetings, and to vote thereat. |
|
5.4. |
GEF is the affiliated political foundation of the EGP.
|
|
5.5. |
The European Green Party acts as the European partner within the structure of the Global Greens, which encompasses Green parties and associates at a global level. |
Article 6
Structure and Bodies of the European Green Party
|
6.1. |
The bodies of the European Green Party are:
|
|
6.3. |
Council
|
|
6.4. |
Congress
|
|
6.5. |
Committee
|
Article 7
The Finance Advisory Board (FAB)
|
7.1. |
The Council shall elect a Finance Advisory Board of 3 persons to work with the Treasurer and the Committee to supervise the financial management of the European Green Party, including its accountability and financial transparency and to give advice to the Council and the Committee of the European Green Party as well as to its Members on these matters. The Board shall also report to Council annually on whether the European Green Party has acted in accordance with the Statutes and Rule Book. |
|
7.2. |
The composition of and regulations for the Finance Advisory Board are further defined in the Rule Book. |
Article 8
The Conciliation Panel
|
8.1. |
The Council shall elect a Conciliation Panel consisting of a minimum of 5 persons to assist in settling disputes between Members, persons and/or bodies of the EGP on issues relating to the interpretation of these Statutes or the Rule Book or other operational matters. The Panel shall report to Council with recommendations and Council shall determine the appropriate course of action. All persons and bodies of the European Green Party shall be bound by the outcome of this process. |
|
8.2. |
The composition of and regulations for the Conciliation Panel are further defined in the Rule Book. |
Article 9
Accounts and Budget
|
9.1. |
Annually, the Treasurer shall prepare the annual accounts and the budget; and present these to the Committee and the Finance Advisory Board in order to finalize them. The finalized annual accounts and budget will be submitted to the Council for approval. In this respect, the Council will hear the Finance Advisory Board. The annual accounts are audited by an auditor that is mandated by the European Parliament. The audit report will be communicated to the subsequent Council. |
|
9.2. |
The bookkeeping is conducted in accordance with the international accounting standards defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002. |
Article 10
Donation Policy
|
10.1. |
The EGP will publish a list annually, specifying both donor and donation, for all donations exceeding 1 000 EUR per donor or per online donation, except during election campaigns to the European Parliament or for donations exceeding 3 500 EUR, where publication will take place immediately on the EGP website. |
|
10.2. |
European Green Party does not accept:
|
|
10.3. |
Any donation that is not permitted under Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations will, within 30 days following the date it is received by the European political party or the European political foundation:
|
Article 11
Privacy and Protection of Personal Data
|
11.1. |
The European Green Party processes personal data of supporters and participants on the basis of their consent under the Directive 1995/46/EC as well as the Belgian Privacy Act of 8 December 1992. Personal data is securely stored and not shared or disclosed to third parties without the consent of the data subject, unless this is necessary for the compliance with a legal obligation. The name and function of donors who donate over 1 000 EUR per year and of participants of the EGP Council meetings will be published. Data subjects have in particular the right to access their data and to request erasure or rectification. |
Article 12
Legal liability and representation
|
12.1. |
The Committee is legally liable for actions of the European Green Party within the limits of the laws of the country where the official seat of the European Green Party is situated in accordance with Article 2 hereof. |
|
12.2. |
Contracts on behalf of the European Green Party normally require a single signature of a Co-Chair, the Secretary-General or the Treasurer. |
|
12.3. |
The persons specified in Article 9.2 hereof may represent the European Green Party and defend its interests in court and act as its legal representatives in any jurisdiction. |
|
12.4. |
The European Green Party may appoint a special proxy holder, and is legally bound by acts of such person within the limits of their power of attorney. |
Article 13
Liquidation
|
13.1. |
Upon a proposal to the Council by the Committee or by a minimum of one third of the Full Members, the Council may decide upon the dissolution and liquidation of the European Green Party provided the proper proceedings have been complied with. The decision by the Council to liquidate the European Green Party must be made by a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes. |
|
13.2. |
As from the moment the decision of dissolution is taken, the European Green Party is required to mention at all times that it is ‘in dissolution’. |
|
13.3. |
Upon dissolution, the Council shall decide on (i) the appointment, the powers and the remuneration of the liquidator(s), (ii) the methods and procedures of the liquidation. All such decisions have to be duly filed at the clerk’s office of the competent Commercial Court and published in the Annexes to the Moniteur Belge in line with the applicable legislation. |
|
13.4. |
In the event that European legislation provides for a different legal status for political parties and the Council of the European Green Party decides to adopt such a status, the financial and other assets of the European Green Party shall be transferred to the new legal entity. |
|
13.5. |
In the event of the final liquidation of the European Green Party, after the settlement of contractual obligations to staff and other obligations, the remaining financial and other assets shall be transferred to the Green European Foundation. |
Article 14
Additional Provisions and changes to the Statutes
|
14.1. |
The Council shall adopt a Rule Book containing detailed rules for the functioning, management and operations of the European Green Party and the composition of its bodies in accordance with these Statutes. |
|
14.2. |
Changes to these Statutes may only be made by Council voting with a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes. Changes to the Rule Book may only be made by Council voting with a two-thirds majority of the Allocated Votes with the exception of the Articles 6.5 and 6.6, which require a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes. |
|
14.3. |
All changes to the present Statutes must be formalised in accordance with the provisions of Title III of the Belgian law of 27 June 1921 on non-profit associations, foundations and European political parties and foundations. |
|
14.4. |
Any omissions to the present Statutes are covered by the law of 27 June 1921 governing non-profit associations, foundations and European political parties and foundations. |
|
14.5. |
Matters related to the application of the present Statutes shall be determined by the courts of Brussels or by arbitration and the laws of Belgium shall apply. |
|
14.6. |
In the event of divergence or of doubt between these statutes in French and the original version in English, the English language version prevails. |
Annex A
The Charter of the European Greens
European Green Party Guiding Principles
Adopted at 2nd EGP Congress, Geneva, 13-14 October 2006
Who we are
The European Greens proudly stand for the sustainable development of humanity on planet Earth, a mode of development respectful of human rights and built upon the values of environmental responsibility, freedom, justice, diversity and non-violence.
Green political movements emerged in Europe while the continent was divided by the Cold War and amidst the energy crises of the mid-seventies. At that time, it became clear that the pattern of economic development was unsustainable and was putting the planet and its inhabitants in grave environmental, social and economic dangers. Existing political parties were incapable of dealing with this challenge.
Our origins lie in many social movement: environmentalists and anti-nuclear activists concerned with the growing damages to our planet; non-violent peace activists promoting alternative ways to resolve conflicts; feminists, struggling for real equality between women and men; freedom and human rights movements fighting against dictatorial and authoritarian regimes; third-world solidarity movements supporting the end of colonization and more economically balanced relations between the North and the South of our planet; activists campaigning against poverty and for social justice within our own societies.
From these origins, European Greens have come together to form our own political family. We stand for a free, democratic and social Europe in a peaceful, equitable and environmentally sustainable world. We defend values like justice, human and citizen's rights, solidarity, sustainability and the right of each individual to lead their own lives, free from fear.
From the beginning, Greens have advocated thinking globally and acting locally. To develop cooperation at European level, a coordination body was founded in 1984, transforming itself in 1993 into the European Federation of Green Parties. In 2004, underlining the objective of a deeper cooperation, the Federation was transformed again into the European Green Party. European Greens are part of a thriving global Green movement.
Guiding principles
The guiding principles which provide the framework to the political actions by the member parties of the European Green Party can be defined as follows:
I. Environmental Responsibility
Taking responsibility for our biosphere is a central tenet of Green values. Society depends on the ecological resources and the health and resilience of the planet, and we bear an over-riding obligation to future generations to protect this inheritance.
We advocate strongly the need to live within our ecological means. We must maintain biological diversity and combat global warming through sustainable use of renewable resources and the careful husbandry of non-renewable resources. The responsible use of bio-diversity is of critical importance for meeting the food, health and other needs of the growing world population. But beyond any notion of utility, Greens believe that each of the diverse species of life on our planet has an intrinsic value and beauty and therefore deserves to be protected.
Our European pattern of production, consumption and commerce are contributing to the continued poverty of the majority of the planet's inhabitants and causing severe environmental degradation and climatic instability. Industrialised and industrialising countries can no longer postpone action to respond to these challenges. The urgent need to change these patterns necessarily means a profound adjustment process if we are to reverse this damaging exploitation of our common home.
The political challenge facing us is the task to restructure the global agenda so that economic and trade policies serve social and environmental objectives and not just economic indices. Our answer is sustainable development, which integrates environmental, social and economic objectives for the benefit of all. Sustainable development can only be achieved through global cooperation to overcome the economic contradictions between the developing countries, the emerging economies and the industrialised world. Every citizen of the world has the same right to a fair share of the world's resources and also bears the same obligation to ensure that future generations can enjoy the same benefits.
Greens always seek to apply the precautionary principle. We will not support measures which present potential threats to human health or environmental well-being. But neither will we accept delay in implementation of new precautionary measures solely on the ground that scientific studies are not sufficiently numerous. Whatever the domain, - peace, energy, food and agriculture, life sciences, transport, technology, medicine, –decisions and action must systematically follow the least harmful option.
Specifically as regards nuclear energy, Greens stand for a nuclear-free Europe, because of the civil and military threats it poses, because of the burden it puts onto the future generations and because of the security apparatus it needs. For Greens, the priority is to develop decentralized and renewable alternative energies.
II. Freedom through Self-Determination:
Individual autonomy
We Greens believe all human beings — regardless of sex, age, sexual orientation or identity, ethnic origin or disability- have the right to make their own choices, to express themselves freely and to shape their own lives. This freedom is not exclusively about material possessions; it includes the social, cultural, intellectual and spiritual dimensions of human life.
These inalienable rights should be guaranteed by law and taught in schools as basic foundations of our societies. They should be fulfilled by empowerment of the people, by the opportunity for all women and men to make a living for themselves and their families and, where necessary, by social and material support, sufficient to lead a dignified life and to fully participate in society. Where these rights are lacking, we Greens will fight for them, proposing solidarity, education, development cooperation and protection from violence, oppression, and discrimination.
Inclusive democracy
Our belief in democracy is founded upon the mutual recognition of all individuals as equals. To encourage a maximum level of commitment, the political and decision-making processes have to be democratic, inclusive, transparent and fully accessible in a way comprehensible to ordinary citizens. The radical changes needed for sustainable development require that all take a common responsibility and a fair share of the burden. Elected representatives have the duty to consult and fully inform their constituents throughout the whole decision making process.
We must always think globally, even whilst acting locally. To ensure the highest level of citizens' involvement and benefit, the authority to decide should be vested in the lowest effective level. Conversely, whenever a problem requires action on a higher level, the consequences for the lower levels should be taken into account and differences respected. Minority interests must be given adequate attention and protection.
We are committed to strengthening democracy throughout Europe, at local, regional, national and supra-national levels. We want to strengthen the democratic responsibility and accountability of multi-lateral institutions.
III. Extending Justice:
Green policies are based on the principle of justice. This demands a fair distribution of society's goods and this, in turn, requires special attention to the needs of the weakest. Attention to the weakest is especially of importance at the global level, where Europe has a specific responsibility to stimulate economic growth in the developing countries. Because we have to address the problems of a changing world, our notion of justice goes far beyond traditional redistribution policies. Greens stand for social justice, for gender equity, for justice between generations, and for justice at the global level. Despite the practical conflicts arising between them, these dimensions of justice must not be played off against each other.
Social justice ensures that everyone has access to vital societal resources: education, work and democratic participation. Fair access must be defended in the face of existing social imbalances, and needs to be institutionally safeguarded. Education is a decisive factor in the ability to shape one's own life. Using our labour skills enables us to bear the fruits of our abilities and thus defines a key part of our identity. Democratic participation is a basic requirement for becoming involved in society and helping to shape it.
Gender equity. Justice is also gender equity. Women and men should enjoy the same power to define how society will develop. Moreover, they should be able to live their lives free from violence. We Greens want to develop the institutional framework which guarantees women equality at home, at work, in public office and in other positions of influence. We want to facilitate the harmonisation of family and professional life for both genders.
Justice between the generations. The motto ‘We have only borrowed the world from our children’ is more appropriate today than ever before. Today, our children's future is at risk. Justice between generations means an obligation for the older generation to hand down our environmental, social and cultural heritage to the younger ones in a sustainable way. It also includes an obligation for the younger generations to care for the elder population. It should be ensured that all generations can participate fully in society.
Global justice. Justice is also our yardstick on the international level. As the global economy connects people and increases our interdependence, this moral obligation also becomes a practical imperative. Worldwide sustainable development and universal human rights are at the core of our concept of global justice. These must be underpinned by an independent institutional monitoring framework for corporate social responsibility and fair trade.
Justice requires solidarity, non-discrimination and citizens' involvement. Solidarity helps create self-confident individuals — it strengthens citizens instead of patronising them. All public authorities should work in partnership with citizens to create and defend institutions that enhance solidarity. For this reason we also want to invest in networks and communities, which, with state encouragement, practice mutual support.
IV. Diversity, an Indispensable Condition
The richness of civilisations, societies, and cultures has developed through diversification. We Greens are ourselves the result of the merging of a host of social movements, and we believe diversity is a condition for success, survival even, in almost every field of activity. Diversity increases the resilience of organisations and groups whenever they are confronted with unexpected changes. It is a safeguard against intolerance, extremism and totalitarianism. And it is an indispensable source of inspiration and renewal.
Human diversity has many dimensions: gender, social, cultural, spiritual, philosophical, religious, linguistic, economic, ethnic, sexual, regional. These may be expressed by individuals or by social groups. We cherish this diversity. It should however never be used as a pretext for questioning universal rights.
Where people share the same limited space, differences may easily be perceived as threats. Even in the smallest community, the strong tend to make use of their dominant role whereas the weak often find themselves pushed to conform. Safeguarding diversity therefore requires recognition, mutual understanding and respect – and, only too often, active protection.
V. Non-Violence
Non-violence forms a key part of the philosophical background of Green theories and conditions our approach to all problems. No lasting solution to any conflict between individuals, social groups or States can be imposed by force. A basic green principle is that the means used to achieve an objective must be compatible with the objective itself. So the political search for justice and peace cannot be achieved by violent means.
Violence is not just physical. Human actions and global economic structures can deprive people of their human rights and exacerbate social injustice. Poverty is perhaps the most insidious form of violence. To eliminate poverty, we promote international bodies that aim at economic equity and put people's livelihoods and security first, as well as binding global rules for the protection of human rights.
Insofar as armed conflicts are concerned, we are convinced that the use of army or police forces as an isolated strategy cannot be successful in the long run. Greens want to see less military intervention and the implementation of the concept of a civil foreign and security policy. This requires the development of powerful tools for conflict prevention and civil conflict management.
Nevertheless Greens recognise that military means may be called upon by the international community as a last resort. Where there is a threat of mass violence against civilians, deployment of peace-keeping military forces may be justified as a deterrent. When preventative measures have failed, armed intervention may be necessary. Recourse to military means will be subject to the rule of international law and is only legitimate if the following conditions are met:
|
— |
the existence of an explicit mandate of the UN Security Council; |
|
— |
the agreement to the primary objective of intervening in order to save and protect lives through preventing violence; |
|
— |
the existence of a political strategy defining how such military intervention should end and a peaceful and stable situation be established. |
VI. To sum it up, Sustainable Development
Greens recognize that the values of environmental responsibility, freedom, justice, diversity and non-violence can be – and are to some extent – shared by other political families. What defines Greens is that we consider these values as interdependent and inseparable. As a whole, they determine all our actions directed towards the sustainable social, cultural, environmental and economic development of our societies on planet Earth. We apply them not only to our external policies but to our own political conduct as well as to the organisation of our own party.
Europeans were the pioneers of the process of industrialization which is at the heart of some of our worst global problems. As citizens of one of the wealthiest continents on Earth, we Europeans carry a major responsibility for the reversal of the destructive trends it has generated and for initiating an alternative and sustainable development model. The scope of the issues at stake is such that it is beyond the powers of any single state to achieve this aim. Therefore we need cooperation in which all of Europe — from Dublin to Tbilisi, from Helsinki to Lisbon, from Ankara to Reykjavik — will be able to participate.
The European Union is well placed to facilitate this cooperation, providing that:
|
a) |
it remains open for further enlargements; |
|
b) |
it restructures itself into a truly democratic institution, |
|
c) |
it reorients its priorities towards an environmentally and socially sustainable model of development and |
|
d) |
it assumes its global responsibilities, under the United Nations, and in cooperation with other valuable institutions such as the OSCE and the Council of Europe, for a peaceful and sustainable world. |
Annex B
Membership List
List of the Full Members of the EGP – 31 March 2017
|
Country |
Party |
Status |
|
Albania |
Partia e Gjelber |
Full Member since 2008 |
|
Andorra |
Verds D’Andorra |
Full Member since 2010 |
|
Austria |
Die Grünen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Belgium |
Ecolo |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Belgium |
Groen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Bulgaria |
Zelena Partija Bulgaria |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Bulgaria |
Zelenite |
Full Member since 2013 |
|
Cyprus |
Cyprus Green Party |
Full Member since 1998 |
|
Czech Republic |
Strana Zelenych |
Full Member since 1997 |
|
Denmark |
Socialistisk Folkeparti/SF |
Full Member since 2014 |
|
Estonia |
Eestimaa Rohelised |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Finland |
Vihreät — De Gröna |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
France |
Europe Ecologie — Les Verts/EELV |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Georgia |
Sakartvelo’s mtsvaneta partia |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Germany |
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Greece |
Oicologoi-Prasinoi/Ecologist Greens |
Full Member since 1994 |
|
Hungary |
Lehet Más a Politika/LMP |
Full Member since 2011 |
|
Ireland |
Comhaontas Glas |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Italy |
Federazione dei Verdi |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Latvia |
Latvijas Zala Partija/LZP |
Full Member since 2001 |
|
Luxembourg |
déi gréng |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Malta |
Alternattiva Demokratika – the Green Party |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Moldova |
Partidul Verde Ecologist |
Full Member since 2008 |
|
Netherlands |
De Groenen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Netherlands |
GroenLinks |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Norway |
Miljøpartiet De Grønne |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Poland |
Zieloni |
Full Member since 2005 |
|
Portugal |
Partido Ecologista – Os Verdes |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Romania |
Partidul Verde |
Full Member since 1999 |
|
Slovenia |
Stranka mladih — Zeleni Evrope/SMS-Zeleni |
Full Member since 2006 |
|
Spain |
Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds/ICV |
Full Member since 2006 |
|
Spain |
EQUO |
Full Member since 2016 |
|
Sweden |
Miljöpartiet de gröna |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Switzerland |
Grüne/Les Verts/I Verdi |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Ukraine |
Partija Zelenykh Ukrainy/PZU |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
United Kingdom |
Green Party of England and Wales |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
United Kingdom |
Scottish Green Party |
Full Member since 1994 |
List of Associate Members – 31 March 2017
|
Country |
Party |
Status |
|
Azerbaijan |
Azerbaycan Yaşıllar Partiyası |
Associate member since November 2012 |
|
Belarus |
Bielaruskaja Partyja ‘Zialonye’ |
Associate member since May 2013 |
|
Russia |
Зеленая Россия/Green Russia |
Associate member since May 2013 |
|
Russia |
GROZA |
Associate Member since December 2016 |
List of Candidate Members – 31 March 2017
|
Country |
Party |
Status |
|
Croatia |
ORaH |
Candidate member since November 2014 |
|
Macedonia |
Democratic Renewal of Macedonia (DOM) |
Candidate member since November 2015 |
|
Turkey |
Yeşiller ve Sol Gelecek Partisi |
Candidate member since November 2012 |
List of Special Members – 31 March 2017
|
AUT |
– |
Die Grünen, AUSTRIA (3) Ulrike LUNACEK (indirect) Michel REIMON (indirect) Monika VANA (indirect) |
|
BEL |
– |
Groen and ECOLO, BELGIUM (2) Philippe LAMBERTS, ECOLO (indirect) Bart STAES, Groen (indirect) |
|
DEU |
– |
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, GERMANY (11) Jan Philipp ALBRECHT (indirect) Reinhard BÜTIKOFER (indirect) Michael CRAMER (indirect) Sven GIEGOLD (indirect) Rebecca HARMS (indirect) Martin HÄUSLING (indirect) Maria HEUBUCH (indirect) Barbara LOCHBIHLER (indirect) Ska KELLER (indirect) Terry REINTKE (indirect) Helga TRÜPEL (indirect) |
|
DNK |
– |
SF – DENMARK (1) Margrete AUKEN (indirect) |
|
ESP |
– |
Iniciativa Catalunya-Verds and EQUO — SPAIN (2) Ernest URTASUN, Iniciativa Catalunya Verds (indirect) Florent MARCELLESI, EQUO (indirect) |
|
FIN |
– |
Vihreät – De Gröna — FINLAND (1) Heidi HAUTALA (indirect) |
|
FRA |
– |
Europe Ecologie — Les Verts (EELV) - FRANCE (6) José BOVÉ (indirect) Karima DELLI (indirect) Pascal DURAND (indirect) Yannick JADOT (indirect) Eva JOLY (indirect) Michèle RIVASI (indirect) |
|
GBR |
– |
The Green Party, England and Wales — UNITED KINGDOM (3) Jean LAMBERT (indirect) Molly SCOTT CATO (indirect) Keith TAYLOR (indirect) |
|
HRV |
– |
Independent – CROATIA (1) Davor ŠKRLEC (direct) |
|
HUN |
– |
Lehet Más a Politika and Párbeszéd Magyarországért – HUNGARY (2) Tamas MESZERICS, Lehet Más a Politika (indirect) Benedek JÁVOR, Párbeszéd Magyarországért (direct) |
|
ITA |
– |
Independent – ITALY (1) Marco AFFRONTE (direct) |
|
LTU |
– |
Lietuvos valstiečių ir žaliųjų sąjunga – LITHUANIA (1) Bronis ROPE (direct) |
|
LUX |
– |
Déi gréng — LUXEMBOURG (1) Claude TURMES (indirect) |
|
NLD |
– |
GroenLinks – NETHERLANDS (2) Bas EICKHOUT (indirect) Judith SARGENTINI (indirect) |
|
SVN |
– |
Party Verjamem – SLOVENIA (1) Igor ŠOLTES (direct) |
|
SWE |
– |
Miljöpartiet de gröna — SWEDEN (4) Max ANDERSSON (indirect) Bodil VALERO (indirect) Linnéa ENGSTRÖM (indirect) Jakop DALUNDE (indirect) |
Annex C
Charter of the global Greens
As adopted in Canberra 2001 and updated in Dakar 2012
The Global Greens is the international network of Green parties and political movements
Contents
| Preamble | 34 |
| Principles | 36 |
| Ecological Wisdom | 36 |
| Social Justice | 36 |
| Participatory Democracy | 36 |
| Nonviolence | 37 |
| Sustainability | 37 |
| Respect for Diversity | 38 |
| Political Action | 38 |
|
1. |
Democracy | 38 |
|
2. |
Equity | 39 |
|
3. |
Climate change and energy | 40 |
|
4. |
Biodiversity | 40 |
|
5. |
Governing economic globalisation by sustainability principles | 41 |
|
6. |
Human rights | 42 |
|
7. |
Food and water | 43 |
|
8. |
Sustainable planning | 44 |
|
9. |
Peace and security | 45 |
|
10. |
Acting globally | 45 |
Preamble
We, as citizens of the planet and members of the Global Greens,
United in our awareness that we depend on the Earth's vitality, diversity and beauty, and that it is our responsibility to pass them on, undiminished or even improved, to the next generation
Recognising that the dominant patterns of human production and consumption, based on the dogma of economic growth at any cost and the excessive and wasteful use of natural resources without considering Earth's carrying capacity, are causing extreme deterioration in the environment and a massive extinction of species
Acknowledging that injustice, racism, poverty, ignorance, corruption, crime and violence, armed conflict and the search for maximum short term profit are causing widespread human suffering
Accepting that developed countries through their pursuit of economic and political goals have contributed to the degradation of the environment and of human dignity
Understanding that many of the world's peoples and nations have been impoverished by the long centuries of colonisation and exploitation, creating an ecological debt owed by the rich nations to those that have been impoverished
Committed to closing the gap between rich and poor and building a citizenship based on equal rights for all individuals in all spheres of social, economic, political and cultural life
Recognising that without equality between men and women, no real democracy can be achieved
Concerned for the dignity of humanity and the value of cultural heritage
Recognising the rights of indigenous people and their contribution to the common heritage, as well as the right of all minorities and oppressed peoples to their culture, religion, economic and cultural life
Convinced that cooperation rather than competition is a pre-requisite for ensuring the guarantee of such human rights as nutritious food, comfortable shelter, health, education, fair labour, free speech, clean air, potable water and an unspoilt natural environment
Recognising that the environment ignores borders between countries
and
Building on the Declaration of the Global Gathering of Greens at Rio in 1992
Assert the need for fundamental changes in people's attitudes, values, and ways of producing and living
Declare that the new millennium provides a defining point to begin that transformation
Resolve to promote a comprehensive concept of sustainability which
|
— |
protects and restores the integrity of the Earth's ecosystems, with special concern for biodiversity and the natural processes that sustain life |
|
— |
acknowledges the interrelatedness of all ecological, social and economic processes |
|
— |
balances individual interests with the common good |
|
— |
harmonises freedom with responsibility |
|
— |
welcomes diversity within unity |
|
— |
reconciles short term objectives with long term goals |
|
— |
ensures that future generations have the same right as the present generation to natural and cultural benefits |
Affirm our responsibility to one another, to the greater community of life, and to future generations
Commit ourselves as Green parties and political movements from around the world to implement these interrelated principles and to create a global partnership in support of their fulfillment
Principles
The policies of the Global Greens are founded upon the principles of
Ecological Wisdom
We acknowledge that human beings are part of the natural world and we respect the specific values of all forms of life, including non-human species.
We acknowledge the wisdom of the indigenous peoples of the world, as custodians of the land and its resources.
We acknowledge that human society depends on the ecological resources of the planet, and must ensure the integrity of ecosystems and preserve biodiversity and the resilience of life supporting systems.
This requires
|
— |
that we learn to live within the ecological and resource limits of the planet |
|
— |
that we protect animal and plant life, and life itself that is sustained by the natural elements: earth, water, air and sun |
|
— |
where knowledge is limited, that we take the path of caution, in order to secure the continued abundance of the resources of the planet for present and future generations. |
Social Justice
We assert that the key to social justice is the equitable distribution of social and natural resources, both locally and globally, to meet basic human needs unconditionally, and to ensure that all citizens have full opportunities for personal and social development.
We declare that there is no social justice without environmental justice, and no environmental justice without social justice.
This requires
|
— |
a just organization of the world and a stable world economy which will close the widening gap between rich and poor, both within and between countries; balance the flow of resources from South to North; and lift the burden of debt on poor countries which prevents their development. |
|
— |
the eradication of poverty, as an ethical, social, economic, and ecological imperative |
|
— |
the elimination of illiteracy |
|
— |
a new vision of citizenship built on equal rights for all individuals regardless of gender, race, age, religion, class, ethnic or national origin, sexual orientation, disability, wealth or health |
Participatory Democracy
We strive for a democracy in which all citizens have the right to express their views, and are able to directly participate in the environmental, economic, social and political decisions which affect their lives; so that power and responsibility are concentrated in local and regional communities, and devolved only where essential to higher tiers of governance.
This requires
|
— |
individual empowerment through access to all the relevant information required for any decision, and access to education to enable all to participate |
|
— |
breaking down inequalities of wealth and power that inhibit participation |
|
— |
building grassroots institutions that enable decisions to be made directly at the appropriate level by those affected, based on systems which encourage civic vitality, voluntary action and community responsibility |
|
— |
strong support for giving young people a voice through educating, encouraging and assisting youth involvement in every aspect of political life including their participation in all decision making bodies. |
|
— |
that all elected representatives are committed to the principles of transparency, truthfulness, and accountability in governance. |
|
— |
that all electoral systems are transparent and democratic, and that this is enforced by law |
|
— |
that in all electoral systems, each adult has an equal vote |
|
— |
that all electoral systems are based on proportional representation, and all elections are publicly funded with strict limits on, and full transparency of, corporate and private donations. |
|
— |
that all citizens have the right to be a member of the political party of their choice within a multi-party system |
Nonviolence
We declare our commitment to nonviolence and strive for a culture of peace and cooperation between states, inside societies and between individuals, as the basis of global security.
We believe that security should not rest mainly on military strength but on cooperation, sound economic and social development, environmental safety, and respect for human rights.
This requires
|
— |
a comprehensive concept of global security, which gives priority to social, economic, ecological, psychological and cultural aspects of conflict, instead of a concept based primarily on military balances of power |
|
— |
a global security system capable of the prevention, management and resolution of conflicts |
|
— |
removing the causes of war by understanding and respecting other cultures, eradicating racism, promoting freedom and democracy, and ending global poverty |
|
— |
pursuing general and complete disarmament including international agreements to ensure a complete and definitive ban of nuclear, biological and chemical arms, anti-personnel mines and depleted uranium weapons |
|
— |
strengthening the United Nations (UN) as the global organisation of conflict management and peacekeeping |
|
— |
pursuing a rigorous code of conduct on arms exports to countries where human rights are being violated. |
Sustainability
We recognise the limited scope for the material expansion of human society within the biosphere, and the need to maintain biodiversity through sustainable use of renewable resources and responsible use of non-renewable resources.
We believe that to achieve sustainability, and in order to provide for the needs of present and future generations within the finite resources of the earth, continuing growth in global consumption, population and material inequity must be halted and reversed.
We recognise that sustainability will not be possible as long as poverty persists.
This requires
|
— |
ensuring that the rich limit their consumption to allow the poor their fair share of the earth's resources |
|
— |
redefining the concept of wealth, to focus on quality of life rather than capacity for over-consumption |
|
— |
creating a world economy which aims to satisfy the needs of all, not the greed of a few; and enables those presently living to meet their own needs, without jeopardising the ability of future generations to meet theirs |
|
— |
eliminating the causes of population growth by ensuring economic security, and providing access to basic education and health, for all; giving both men and women greater control over their fertility |
|
— |
redefining the roles and responsibilities of trans-national corporations in order to support the principles of sustainable development |
|
— |
implementing mechanisms to tax, as well as regulating, speculative financial flows |
|
— |
ensuring that market prices of goods and services fully incorporate the environmental costs of their production and consumption |
|
— |
achieving greater resource and energy efficiency and development and use of environmentally sustainable technologies |
|
— |
encouraging local self-reliance to the greatest practical extent to create worthwhile, satisfying communities |
|
— |
recognising the key role of youth culture and encouraging an ethic of sustainability within that culture. |
Respect for Diversity
We honour cultural, linguistic, ethnic, sexual, religious and spiritual diversity within the context of individual responsibility toward all beings.
We defend the right of all persons, without discrimination, to an environment supportive of their dignity, bodily health, and spiritual well-being
We promote the building of respectful, positive and responsible relationships across lines of division in the spirit of a multi-cultural society.
This requires
|
— |
recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples to the basic means of their survival, both economic and cultural, including rights to land and to self determination; and acknowledgment of their contribution to the common heritage of national and global culture |
|
— |
recognition of the rights of ethnic minorities to develop their culture, religion and language without discrimination, and to full legal, social and cultural participation in the democratic process |
|
— |
recognition of and respect for sexual minorities |
|
— |
equality between women and men in all spheres of social, economic, political and cultural life |
|
— |
significant involvement of youth culture as a valuable contribution to our Green vision, and recognition that young people have distinct needs and modes of expression. |
Political Action
1. Democracy
|
1.0. |
The majority of the world's people live in countries with undemocratic regimes where corruption is rampant and human rights abuses and press censorship are commonplace. Developed democracies suffer less apparent forms of corruption through media concentration, corporate political funding, systematic exclusion of racial, ethnic, national and religious communities, and electoral systems that discriminate against alternative ideas and new and small parties. |
The Greens -
|
1.1. |
Have as a priority the encouragement and support of grassroots movements and other organisations of civil society working for democratic, transparent and accountable government, at all levels. |
|
1.2. |
Actively support giving young people a voice through educating, encouraging and assisting youth participation in every aspect of political action. |
|
1.3. |
Will strive for the democratisation of gender relations by promoting appropriate mediations to enable women and men equally to take part in the economic, political, social sphere. |
|
1.4. |
Support the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business and urge non-parties to sign and ratify without further delay |
|
1.5. |
Uphold the right of citizens to have access to official information and to free and independent media. |
|
1.6. |
Will work for universal access to electronic communications and information technology, as minimum, through radio, community-based internet and email. We will also work to make access to these technologies as cheap as possible. |
|
1.7. |
Uphold a just secular legal system that ensures the right of defence and practices proportionality between crime and punishment. |
|
1.8. |
Support the public funding of elections, and measures to ensure all donations are fully transparent and accountable and are free from undue influence, whether perceived or otherwise. |
|
1.9. |
Will challenge corporate domination of government, especially where citizens are deprived of their right to political participation. |
|
1.10. |
Support the separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial systems, and the separation of state and religion. |
|
1.11. |
Support the development and strengthening of local government. |
|
1.12. |
Support the restructuring of state institutions to democratise and make them more transparent and efficient in serving the goal of citizens' power and sustainable development. |
|
1.13. |
Support global governance based on the democratic principle of one person — one vote — one value, rather than by unelected corporate interests. |
2. Equity
|
2.0. |
The differences in living standards and opportunities in the world today are intolerable. Third world debt is at an all time high of US$3,7 trillion while Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries give just 0,31 % of GNP in aid. The richest 20 % of the world's population has 83 % of global income while the poorest 20 %, including nearly 50 % of the world's young people, share barely 1 % and 2,6 billion people live on less than US$2 a day. 60 % of the world's poor are women. 130 million children never attend school while 800 million adults can neither read nor write, two-thirds of them women Population growth has slowed but world population is projected to grow from 6,1 billion in 2000 to 8,9 billion in 2050, an increase of 47 %. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) infections remain severe problems. |
The Greens -
|
2.1. |
Will work to increase government aid to developing countries, and support aid funding being directed to the poorest of the poor, with the priorities being determined through working with local communities. |
|
2.2. |
Will work to improve the rights, status, education and political participation of women. |
|
2.3. |
Commit ourselves to the goal of making high quality primary education universal by 2015 financed through increased aid and debt relief. |
|
2.4. |
Will work towards cancellation of developing country debt especially in the poorest countries, and support the use of incentives to ensure that savings from debt relief are channelled into poverty reduction and environment conservation, and that transparent and accountable processes are in place with participation from affected communities. |
|
2.5. |
See concerted action to combat the great pandemics including HIV-Aids, TB and malaria as a priority, especially in Africa, where a twofold effort is needed to allow general access to low cost and efficient therapies, and to restore economic progress, especially through education. |
|
2.6. |
Recognise the right to compensation of those people that lose access to their natural resources through displacement by environmental destruction or human intervention such as colonisation and migration. |
|
2.7. |
Will review the relationship between exclusive ownership of property and exclusive use of its resources, with a view to curbing environmental abuse and extending access for basic livelihood to all, especially indigenous communities. |
|
2.8. |
Will work to ensure that all men, women and children can achieve economic security, without recourse to personally damaging activities such as pornography, prostitution or the sale of organs. |
|
2.9. |
Will commit to work for more equal allocation of welfare and for creation of equal opportunities inside all our societies, recognising that there is a growing number of poor and marginalised people in developed countries also. |
|
2.10. |
Understand that the current form of financialised neo-liberal capitalism aids the rich and is crisis prone. It contributes to growing inequality and dispossession of poor people |
|
2.11. |
Will defend and promote the human, social and environmental rights of people of colour. |
3. Climate change and energy
|
3.0. |
The climate crisis is both greatest challenge facing the global community and the greatest opportunity for humanity to rethink how we live, in a way that is socially just and within the Earth's ecological limits. The Greens are committed to limiting global temperature rise to no more than 1,5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Global emissions will need to peak well before 2020 to have a chance to stay within this temperature limit. |
The Greens -
|
3.1. |
Adopt the target of limiting CO2 levels in the atmosphere to 450 ppm in the shortest period possible. |
|
3.2. |
Will work to support a rapid transition to zero carbon economies around the world. |
|
3.3. |
Will work to establish an international emissions reporting framework for trans-national corporations, linked to global carbon taxes and global environmental loads. |
|
3.4. |
Will work hard to ensure that developing countries have access to the most efficient, sustainable and appropriate technology, with a strong focus on renewable energy, and that they agree to Climate Change Conventions to ensure that actions are comprehensive and worldwide. The equity principle must be at the core of climate change negotiations and measures. |
|
3.5. |
Oppose any expansion of nuclear power and will work to phase it out rapidly. |
|
3.6. |
Will support a call for a moratorium on new fossil fuel exploration and development |
|
3.7. |
Will work to stop deforestation and degradation of natural forests by 2020, noting that they are the most carbon rich ecosystems on the planet, vital to indigenous people, rich in plants and animals, and irreplaceable in any human time scale. |
|
3.8. |
Promote tree planting of diverse species but not monocultures, as a short-term measure for carbon sequestration, with other benefits for the environment. |
|
3.9. |
Promote the levying of taxes on non-renewable energy and support the use of funds raised to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy. |
|
3.10. |
Support research into the use of sustainable energy sources and the technical development of ecological power production |
|
3.11. |
Promote transfer of energy efficient technologies and green power infrastructure between and within countries and economies on a no-costs or minimal costs basis. This is one of the economic costs of the emissions to date by western countries. |
4. Biodiversity
|
4.0. |
Healthy ecosystems are essential to human life, yet we seem to have forgotten the relationship between nature and society. Extinction rates are 100 to 1000 times higher than in pre-human times. Only 20 % of the Earth's original forests remain relatively undisturbed. 80 % of fish stocks are already depleted or in danger of being overfished. Invasions by non-native plants, animals and diseases are growing rapidly. Habitat destruction and species extinction are driven by industrial and agricultural development that also exacerbates climate change, global inequity and the destruction of indigenous cultures and livelihoods. Agricultural monoculture, promoted by agribusiness and accelerated by genetic modification and patenting of nature, threatens the diversity of crop and domestic animal species, radically increasing vulnerability to disease. |
The Greens -
|
4.1. |
Will vigorously oppose environmentally destructive agricultural and industrial development and give primary effort to protecting native plants and animals in their natural habitat, and wherever possible in large tracts. |
|
4.2. |
Will work to remove subsidies for environmentally destructive activities, including logging, fossil fuel exploitation, dam construction, mining, genetic engineering and agricultural monoculture. |
|
4.3. |
Will promote ecological purchasing policies, for products such as wood, based only on the most rigorous definition of sustainability backed by credible labelling. |
|
4.4. |
Support the concept of ‘debt for nature’ swaps, subject to the agreement of affected indigenous and local communities. |
|
4.5. |
Will promote the repair of degraded natural environments, and the cleanup of toxic sites of former and existing military and industrial zones around the world. |
|
4.6. |
Note that reducing the transport of goods around the world, in line with a preference for local production where possible, will have the added benefit of reducing ‘bio-invasions’, as well as reducing fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
4.7. |
Commit to promote a global ecology curriculum for all levels of education. |
|
4.8. |
Will work towards establishing an international court of justice specifically for environmental destruction and the loss of biodiversity where cases can be heard against corporations, national, states and individuals. |
|
4.9. |
Will refuse to accept the patenting and merchandising of life. |
5. Governing economic globalisation by sustainability principles
|
5.0. |
Fifty-three of the 100 biggest economies in the world today are corporations. With the collusion of governments, they have created a legal system that puts unfettered economic activity above the public good, protects corporate welfare but attacks social welfare, and makes national economies subservient to a global financial casino that turns over $US3 trillion per day in speculative transactions. The Global Financial Crisis has increased volatility and insecurity in all economies, with the most significant impact on poorer individuals, groups and countries. The IMF and the World Bank have contributed to this crisis rather than been part of the solution; the prerequisites on which they are based are not fit to create a global, sustainable and just economic system. |
The Greens -
|
5.1. |
Affirm that essentials of life, such as water, must remain publicly owned and controlled; and that culture, basic access to food, social and public health, education, and a free media are not ‘commodities’ to be subjected to international market agreements. |
|
5.2. |
Support the creation of a World Environment Organisation by combining the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) into a single institution with funding and power to impose sanctions to promote global sustainable development. The World Trade Organisation (WTO) should be subject to the decisions of this body. |
|
5.3. |
Support serious reform of the World Bank and IMF so that their membership and decision-making are democratic, and their operations subservient to sustainability principles and to all international conventions on human and labour rights, and environmental protection. |
|
5.4. |
Support serious reform of the WTO to make sustainability its central goal, supported by transparent and democratic processes and the participation of representatives from affected communities. In addition there must be separation of powers to remove the disputes settlement mechanism from the exclusive competence of the WTO. A sustainability impact assessment of earlier Negotiation Rounds is required before any new steps are taken. |
|
5.5. |
Will work to prevent the implementation of new regional or hemispheric trade and investment agreements under the WTO rules but support countries' integration processes that assure people's welfare and environmental sustainability. |
|
5.6. |
Will create a world environment where financial and economic institutions and organisations will nurture and protect environmentally sustainable projects that will sustain communities at all levels (local, regional, national and international). |
|
5.7. |
Demand that international agreements on the environment, labour conditions and health should take precedence over any international rules on trade. |
|
5.8. |
Will work to implement a Tobin-Henderson or Financial Transactions Tax and other instruments to curb speculative international currency transactions and help encourage investment in the real economy, and to create funds to promote equity in global development. |
|
5.9. |
Will work to require corporations to abide by the environmental, labour and social laws of their own country and of the country in which they are operating, whichever are the more stringent |
|
5.10. |
Will work to ensure that all global organizations, especially those with significant capacity to define the rules of international trade, firmly adhere to principles of sustainable development and pursue a training program of cultural change to fully realise this goal. |
|
5.11. |
Want corporate welfare made transparent and subject to the same level of accountability as social welfare, with subsidies to environmentally and socially destructive activities phased out altogether. |
|
5.12. |
Endorse the development of civic entrepreneurship to promote a community based economy as a way of combating social exclusion caused by economic globalisation. |
6. Human rights
|
6.0. |
Denial of human rights and freedoms goes hand in hand with poverty and political powerlessness. Millions suffer discrimination, intimidation, arbitrary detention, violence and death. Three-quarters of the world's governments have used torture in the last three years. |
The Greens -
|
6.1. |
Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Labour Organisation (ILO) conventions, and other international instruments for the protection of rights and freedoms. We believe that these rights are universal and indivisible and that national governments are responsible for upholding them. |
|
6.2. |
Condemn all dictatorships and regimes which deny human rights, regardless of their political claims |
|
6.3. |
Will work with local communities to promote awareness of human rights, and to ensure that the UN Commission for Human Rights and other treaty bodies are adequately resourced. |
|
6.4. |
Call for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to be amended to include rights to a healthy natural environment and intergenerational rights to natural and cultural resources. |
|
6.5. |
Uphold the right of women to make their own decisions, including the control of their fertility by the means they deem appropriate, free from discrimination or coercion; support the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); urge non-signatories to sign and ratify without further delay; and urge existing signatories to remove all reservations. |
|
6.6. |
Support the right of indigenous peoples to self-determination, land rights, and access to traditional hunting and fishing rights for their own subsistence, using humane and ecologically sustainable techniques; and support moves for indigenous people to set up and work through their own international bodies. |
|
6.7. |
Support the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as the minimum standard of protection accepted by indigenous peoples, and support moves for indigenous people to set up and work through their own international bodies. |
|
6.8. |
Demand that torturers are held accountable, and will campaign for them to be brought to justice, in their own countries or elsewhere, before an international panel of judges serving under the auspices of the International Criminal Court. |
|
6.9. |
Oppose any violation of the physical integrity of the individual by torture, punishment or any other practices including traditional and religious mutilation. |
|
6.10. |
Demand that the death penalty be abolished worldwide. |
|
6.11. |
Call for governments to ensure that all asylum-seekers, whether they are victims of state violence or independent armed groups, are correctly treated in accordance with the 1951 Geneva Convention on the Rights to Asylum; have access to fair processes; are not arbitrarily detained; and are not returned to a country where they might suffer violations of their fundamental human rights, or face the risk of death, torture, or other inhuman treatment. |
|
6.12. |
Call for the prohibition of collective expulsion. |
|
6.13. |
Uphold the right of all workers to safe, fairly remunerated employment, with the freedom to unionise. |
|
6.14. |
Support the right of children to grow up free from the need to work, and the establishment of a lower age limit for working children/adolescents. |
|
6.15. |
Demand decriminalisation of homosexuality, and support the right of gay and lesbian people to their lifestyle, and the equal rights of homosexual relationships. |
|
6.16. |
Will work to improve the opportunities of disabled people to live and work equally in society, including true political participation. |
|
6.17. |
Support the right of linguistic minorities to use their own language. |
7. Food and water
|
7.0. |
Hundreds of millions of people remain undernourished, not because there is insufficient food but because of unequal access to land, water, credit and markets. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are not the solution, because the immediate problem is not production but distribution. Moreover, GMOs pose unacceptable risks to the environment, independent smaller farmers, and consumers, as well as to the biodiversity that is our best insurance against agricultural disaster. Water shortages loom, both in above-ground systems and subterranean aquifers. Deforestation of catchments takes a devastating toll in landslides and floods, while desertification and degradation rapidly are expanding. One bright spot is the rapid growth of organic agriculture. |
The Greens -
|
7.1. |
Consider that access to clean water for basic needs is a fundamental right and oppose the privatisation of water resources and infrastructure. |
|
7.2. |
Will work to eliminate water subsidies, other than social subsidies, and to make water use more efficient. |
|
7.3. |
Will work to ensure that fresh water and underground water resources are conserved in quality and quantity and appropriately priced to ensure these resources are adequately protected from depletion |
|
7.4. |
Consider that the stability of catchments and the health of river systems is paramount, and will work with the people directly affected to stop the degradation of rivers, including new large dams and irrigation projects, and deforestation of catchments. |
|
7.5. |
Will work with local communities in arid and semi-arid regions, where climate is dominated by uncertainty, to reduce land degradation. |
|
7.6. |
Express their concern for countries that have been hard hit by desertification and deforestation, and ask the countries that have not yet done so to ratify the UN Convention of Desertification, and make the necessary resources available to enact this Convention. |
|
7.7. |
Will support and promote organic agriculture. |
|
7.8. |
Call for a worldwide ban on the commercial growing of genetically modified crops. |
|
7.9. |
Will work to ensure that food is safe, with stringent regulations on production, storage and sale. |
|
7.10. |
Will work to ensure that scientific research is conducted ethically and applied in accordance with the precautionary principle. |
|
7.11. |
Call for a phase out of all persistent and bio-accumulative man- made chemicals and to work to eliminate all releases to the environment of hazardous chemicals. |
|
7.12. |
Will work to ensure that animal growth hormones are banned, and stringent regulations governing the use of antibiotics on animals are enforced. |
|
7.13. |
Will work to ensure the humane treatment of all animals during breeding, transport and slaughter and will ensure animal welfare. |
|
7.14. |
Will work towards ensuring the effect of erosion, floods and other environmental hazards are ameliorated and that appropriate adaptation measures are implemented. |
8. Sustainable planning
|
8.0. |
Consumption in industrialised countries is excessive by any measure, and largely responsible for environmental decline. Newly industrialising countries are also increasing their consumption, which will add significantly to the ecological pressure. Changing to a green economy — which mimics ecological processes, eliminates waste by re-using and recycling materials, and emphasises activities that enhance the quality of life and relationships rather than the consumption of goods — brings a promise of new jobs, industries with less pollution, better work environments and a higher quality of life. |
The Greens -
|
8.1. |
Promote measures of well-being rather than GDP to measure progress, and recognise the ecological limits to material growth and consumption. |
|
8.2. |
Consider that citizens of countries affected by a development project have the right to participate in decisions about it, regardless of national boundaries. |
|
8.3. |
Will work to ensure that those who profit from exploiting any common and/or natural resources should pay the full market rent for the use of these resources, and for any damage they do to any other common resources. |
|
8.4. |
Recognise that the impact of continuing urban growth (sprawl) onto agricultural land and the natural environment must be limited and ultimately stopped |
|
8.5. |
Recognise that the process of urbanisation due to rural poverty must be slowed and reversed through appropriate rural development programs which protect the character and ecology of the rural landscape. |
|
8.6. |
Support local planning for ecologically sustainable business, housing, transport, waste management, parks, city forests, public spaces; and will establish links between Greens at local and regional level around the planet to exchange information and support. |
|
8.7. |
Will work to reduce vehicle based urban pollution by opposing ever-expanding freeways; encouraging the use of energy efficient vehicles; integrating land use planning with public transport, bicycling and walking; prioritising mass transit planning and funding over private auto infrastructure; and eliminating tax policies that favour auto-centric development. |
|
8.8. |
Will work to create socially responsible economic strategies, using taxes and public finance to maximise incentives for fair distribution of wealth, and eco-taxes to provide incentives to avoid waste and pollution. |
|
8.9. |
Demand that corporations and communities reduce, reuse and recycle waste, aiming for a zero waste economy which replicates a natural ecosystem. |
|
8.10. |
Will support all policies that allow countries to increase job creation through economic activities that add value, or through recycling of resources, the production of durable goods, organic agriculture, renewable energy and environmental protection. |
|
8.11. |
Promote socially responsible investment and ecological marketing so that consumers can make positive choices based on reliable information. |
|
8.12. |
Recognise the value of traditional and local knowledge and beliefs, and support its incorporation into planning and projects. |
9. Peace and security
|
9.0. |
We understand peace as being more than the absence of war. To strive for peace has always been at the core of the Green agenda. The causes of conflict are changing. The impacts of climate change, competition for water, food and resources will become increasingly significant. The distinctions between war, organised crime and deliberate large-scale abuses of human rights are becoming progressively blurred. Since 2001 the war on ‘terror’ has also led to the erosion of human rights in the name of security. The arms trade is growing and globalising, nourished by a unique exemption from WTO rules against subsidies. As a global network, we have a vital role to play in strengthening the links between community organisations working for human rights and peace, and supporting and shaping the emerging concepts and institutions of global governance. |
The Greens -
|
9.1. |
Support strengthening the role of the UN as a global organisation of conflict management and peacekeeping, while, noting that, where prevention fails and in situations of structural and massive violations of human rights and/or genocide, the use of force may be justified if it is the only means of preventing further human rights violations and suffering, provided that it is used under a mandate from the UN. Nonetheless, individual countries have the right not to support or to cooperate with the action. |
|
9.2. |
Will campaign for greater power for countries of the South in the UN, by working to abolish the veto power in the Security Council, to remove the category of permanent membership of it, and to increase the number of states with membership. |
|
9.3. |
Support the International Criminal Court. In war crimes, sexualised violence such as mass rape should be regarded as a war crime, as should environmental crimes in times of conflict. |
|
9.4. |
Seek to curtail the power of the military-industrial-financial complex in order to radically reduce the trade in armaments, ensure transparency of manufacturing and remove hidden subsidies that benefit the military industries. |
|
9.5. |
Will work to regulate and reduce, with the long term aim of eliminating, the international arms trade (including banning nuclear, biological and chemical arms, depleted uranium weapons and anti-personnel mines) and bring it within the ambit of the UN. |
|
9.6. |
Will help strengthen existing peace programmes and forge new programmes that address all aspects of building a culture of peace. Programmes will include analysis of the roots of violence, including inter-familial violence, and the issue of mutual respect between genders; and support training in non-violent conflict resolution at all levels. |
|
9.7. |
Will seek to amend the international rules of military engagement to ensure that natural resources are adequately protected in conflicts. |
|
9.8. |
Will fight against any National Missile Defence Project, and work towards the demilitarisation and de-nuclearisation of space. |
10. Acting globally
|
10.0. |
The Global Greens are independent organisations from diverse cultures and backgrounds who share a common purpose and recognise that, to achieve it, we must act globally as well as locally. |
The Greens -
|
10.1. |
Will work cooperatively to implement the Global Greens Charter by taking action together on issues of global consequence whenever needed. |
|
10.2. |
Will support the development of Green parties, political movements and youth networks around the world. |
|
10.3. |
Will assist, at their request, other Green parties and movements including by
|
|
10.4. |
Will adopt and put into practice in our own organisations the democratic principles we seek in broader society. |
|
10.5. |
Will act as a model of participatory democracy in our own internal organisation at all levels. |
|
10.6. |
Will encourage cooperation between the global Green parties to ensure that member parties are consulted, educated and have equal capacity to influence global positions of the Greens. |
|
10.7. |
Will encourage Green parties and green political movements to show leadership in establishing policies guaranteeing transparent and decentralised structures, so that political power and opportunity is extended to all members; and in developing new political models which better meet the challenges of sustainable development and grassroots democracy. |
|
10.8. |
Will avoid sources of finance that conflict with our vision and values. |
|
10.9. |
Will avoid cooperation with dictatorships, sects, or criminal organisations and with their dependent organisations, particularly in matters of democracy and human rights. |
|
10.10. |
Will strengthen our links with like-minded community organisations, and with civil society organisations; we are one part, with them, of the growing consciousness that respect for the environment, for social and human rights, and for democracy, has to prevail on the economic organisation of the world. |
|
10.11. |
Will support each other personally and politically with friendship, optimism and good humour, and not forget to enjoy ourselves in the process! |