EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/326/69
Case C-435/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 October 2006 — C
Case C-435/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 October 2006 — C
Case C-435/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 October 2006 — C
JO C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 33–33
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 326/33 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 October 2006 — C
(Case C-435/06)
(2006/C 326/69)
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: C
Questions referred
1. |
|
2. |
If the answer to Question 1(a) is in the affirmative, is it possible, given that the Regulation takes no account of the legislation harmonised by the Nordic Council on the recognition and enforcement of public law decisions on custody, as described above, but solely of a corresponding private law convention, nevertheless to apply this harmonised legislation based on the direct recognition and enforcement of administrative decisions as a form of cooperation between administrative authorities to the taking into custody of a child? |
3. |
If the answer to Question 1(a) is in the affirmative and that to Question 2 is in the negative, does the Brussels IIa Regulation apply temporally to a case, taking account of Articles 72 and 64(2) of the regulation and the abovementioned harmonised Nordic legislation on public law decisions on custody, if in Sweden the administrative authorities took their decision both on immediate taking into custody and on placement with a family on 23.2.2005 and submitted their decision on immediate custody to the administrative court for confirmation on 25.2.2005, and that court accordingly confirmed the decision on 3.3.2005? |
(1) OJ L 338, p. 1.