This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/115/40
Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 January 2005 in Case T-357/03 Bruno Gollnisch and Others v European Parliament (Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 January 2005 in Case T-357/03 Bruno Gollnisch and Others v European Parliament (Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 January 2005 in Case T-357/03 Bruno Gollnisch and Others v European Parliament (Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility)
JO C 115, 14.5.2005, p. 21–21
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.5.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 115/21 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 10 January 2005
in Case T-357/03 Bruno Gollnisch and Others v European Parliament (1)
(Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility)
(2005/C 115/40)
Language of the case: French
In Case T-357/03: Bruno Gollnisch, residing in Limonest (France), Marie-France Stirbois, residing in Villeneuve-Loubet (France), Carl Lang, residing in Boulogne-Billancourt (France), Jean-Claude Martinez, residing in Montpellier (France), Philip Claeys, residing in Overijse (Belgium) and Koen Dillen, residing in Antwerp (Belgium), represented by W. de Saint Just, lawyer, against the European Parliament (Agents: H. Krück and N. Lorenz, having an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 2 July 2003 amending the rules on the use of credits under budgetary heading 3701 of the general budget of the European Union — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánová, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 10 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
The opinion of the Parliament's legal service, produced by the applicants in Annex 5 to the application, is removed from the file; |
|
2. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
|
3. |
The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Parliament. |