This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/031/06
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2004 in Case C-87/00 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Genova): Roberto Nicoli v Eridania SpA (Sugar — Price system — Regionalisation — Deficit areas — Classification of Italy — Marketing year 1998/99 — Regulations (EEC) No 1785/81 and (EC) No 1361/98 — Validity of Regulation No 1361/98)
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2004 in Case C-87/00 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Genova): Roberto Nicoli v Eridania SpA (Sugar — Price system — Regionalisation — Deficit areas — Classification of Italy — Marketing year 1998/99 — Regulations (EEC) No 1785/81 and (EC) No 1361/98 — Validity of Regulation No 1361/98)
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2004 in Case C-87/00 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Genova): Roberto Nicoli v Eridania SpA (Sugar — Price system — Regionalisation — Deficit areas — Classification of Italy — Marketing year 1998/99 — Regulations (EEC) No 1785/81 and (EC) No 1361/98 — Validity of Regulation No 1361/98)
JO C 31, 5.2.2005, p. 3–3
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.2.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 31/3 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Second Chamber)
of 12 October 2004
in Case C-87/00 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Genova): Roberto Nicoli v Eridania SpA (1)
(Sugar - Price system - Regionalisation - Deficit areas - Classification of Italy - Marketing year 1998/99 - Regulations (EEC) No 1785/81 and (EC) No 1361/98 - Validity of Regulation No 1361/98)
(2005/C 31/06)
Language of the case: Italian
In Case C-87/00: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Giudice di pace di Genova (Italy), made by decision of 28 February 2000, received at the Court on 7 March 2000, in the proceedings between Roberto Nicoli and Eridania SpA – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, F. Macken and N. Colneric (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 October 2004, in which it has ruled:
Consideration of the questions raised has disclosed nothing to affect the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 1361/98 of 26 June 1998 fixing, for the 1998/99 marketing year, the derived intervention prices for white sugar, the intervention price for raw sugar, the minimum prices for A and B beet, and the amount of compensation for storage costs.