Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2004/273/34

    Case C-391/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by order of that court of 6 July 2004 in the case of Ipourgos Ikonomikon and Proistamenos D.O.I. Amfissas against Charilaos Georgakis

    JO C 273, 6.11.2004, p. 20–20 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.11.2004   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 273/20

    Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by order of that court of 6 July 2004 in the case of Ipourgos Ikonomikon and Proistamenos D.O.I. Amfissas against Charilaos Georgakis

    (Case C-391/04)

    (2004/C 273/34)

    Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State, Greece) of 6 July 2004 received at the Court Registry on 14 September 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Ipourgos Ikonomikon and Proistamenos D.O.I. Amfissas against Charilaos Georgakis on the following question:

    Where stock-market transactions agreed on in advance which result in the increase or artificial inflation of the price of the securities transferred are carried out between persons or groups of persons having one of the characteristics set out in Article 2(1) of Council Directive 89/592/EEC, (1) are the persons carrying out those transactions to be regarded as persons possessing inside information within the meaning of Articles 1 and 2 of that directive, so that their actions fall within the prohibition, laid down by Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the directive, on taking advantage of inside information?

    (1)  OJ L 334, 18.11.1989, p. 30.

    Top