Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62005TO0449

    Ordonanța Tribunalului de Primă Instanță (camera întâi) din data de 16 februarie 2007.
    Dikigorikos Syllogos Ioanninon împotriva Parlamentului European și Consiliul Uniunii Europene.
    Acțiune în anulare - Directiva 2005/36/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului - Recunoaștere a calificărilor profesionale - Libertate de stabilire - Avocați - Lipsa interesului direct și personal - Inadmisibilitate.
    Cauza T-449/05.

    Repertoriul de jurisprudență 2007 II-00014*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2007:55





    Order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 16 February 2007 – Dikigorikos Syllogos Ioanninon v Parliament and Council

    (Case T-449/05)

    Action for annulment – Directive 2005/36/EC of the Parliament and of the Council – Recognition of professional qualifications – Freedom of establishment – Lawyers – Not directly and individually concerned – Inadmissibility

    Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/36) (see paras 58-85)

    Re:

    APPLICATION for partial annulment of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 2).

    Operative part

    The Court:

     

    Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

     

    Finds no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene;

     

    Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and pay the costs of the Parliament and the Council.

    Top