EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Document 62021TJ0261
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#Manfred Sturz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-261/21.
Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a cincea) din 4 mai 2022.
Manfred Sturz împotriva Oficiului Uniunii Europene pentru Proprietate Intelectuală.
Cauza T-261/21.
Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a cincea) din 4 mai 2022.
Manfred Sturz împotriva Oficiului Uniunii Europene pentru Proprietate Intelectuală.
Cauza T-261/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:269
- Date of document:
- 04/05/2022
- Date lodged:
- 17/05/2021
- Author:
- Tribunalul
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Germania
- Form:
- Hotărâre
- Authentic language:
- germană
- Type of procedure:
- Acţiune în anulare - neîntemeiată
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Öberg
- Treaty:
- Tratat privind funcţionarea Uniunii Europene
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62021TA0261
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12007P041-P2LA: N 61
- 12008E263: N 1
- 32009R0207-A07P1: N 16 55
- 32009R0207: N 2 17 18
- 32009R0207-A07P1LC: N 20 21 24 - 26 28 31 43 50 74
- 32009R0207-A07P1LB: N 21 54
- 32009R0207-A07P2: N 24
- 32009R0207-A52P1LA: N 24
- 32017R1001: N 18 19
- 32017R1001-A72P2: N 20
- 32017R1001-A94: N 20 56
- 32017R1001-A94P1SNT2: N 60
- 32017R1001-A95P2: N 62 85
- 32017R1001-A07P1LG: N 7
- 32017R1001-A59P1LA: N 7
- 32017R1001-A07P1LB: N 7 11
- 32017R1001-A07P1LC: N 7 8 11
- 32018R0625-A27P4: N 62
- 32018R0625-A27P4LA: N 85
- 32018R0625-A27P4LB: N 85
- 62001CJ0191-N32: N 50
- 62003TJ0183-N29: N 55
- 62005TJ0405-N48: N 26
- 62006TJ0028-N28: N 50
- 62009TJ0281-N28: N 28
- 62010CJ0610-N45: N 19
- 62011TJ0313-N47: N 16
- 62011TJ0625-N14: N 25
- 62011TJ0625-N36: N 55
- 62012TJ0244-N19: N 27
- 62013TJ0137-N43: N 44
- 62013TJ0611-N35: N 26
- 62014TJ0558-N23: N 31
- 62016TJ0844-N23: N 47
- 62017TJ0122-N18: N 43
- 62018TJ0117-N103: N 83
- 62018TJ0324-N17: N 16
- 62019TJ0663-N119: N 61
- 62019TJ0663-N120: N 61
- 62020TJ0282-N12: N 17
- Notes relating to the decision:
-
- 1. Martin, Stefan: Validité de la marque - Motifs absolus - Article 7, §1 RMUE – Examen du caractère descriptif de la marque – Prise en compte d’un mot relevant du langage familier (oui), Propriétés intellectuelles 2022, n° 84, p. 104 (FR)
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
-
4.11.03.01.13.03.01 Politica internă a Uniunii Europene / Apropierea legislaţiilor / Marcă a Uniunii Europene / Motive absolute de refuz / Semne examinate / Mărci descriptive / Mărci verbale
The HTML format is unavailable in your User interface language
All