Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document C2006/326/55

Case C-420/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 16 October 2006 — Rüdiger Jager v Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

JO C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 27–27 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
30/12/2006; data publicării
Author:
Curtea de Justiţie
Form:
Informații juridice

30.12.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/27

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 16 October 2006 — Rüdiger Jager v Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

(Case C-420/06)

(2006/C 326/55)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rüdiger Jager

Defendant: Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

Question referred

Can Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (1) be construed as meaning that a provision imposing a more favourable penalty (concerning livestock aid) is to be applied retroactively even if that provision in principle only applies for a period of time during which livestock aid in the Member State concerned is no longer granted as a direct payment has been introduced?

(1)  OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1.

Top