Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 October 2012 — Régie Networks and NRJ Global v Commission

(Case T-340/11)

Action for damages — State aid — Limitation — Damage for which compensation may be awarded — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law — Manifest lack of jurisdiction

1.                     Non-contractual liability — Conditions — Unlawfulness — Damage — Causal link — One of the conditions not satisfied — Claim for compensation dismissed in its entirety (Art. 340, second para., TFEU) (see paras 25, 30, 50)

2.                     Actions for damages — Limitation period — Point from which time starts to run — Responsibility for an individual act — Date of appearance of the prejudicial effects of the act — Date cognisance taken of the unlawfulness of the conduct — Irrelevant — Relationship between the action for compensation and the action for annulment (Arts 63 TFEU and 340, second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 46 and 53, first para.) (see paras 28, 29, 31, 36, 39, 40)

3.                     Actions for damages — Subject-matter — Claim for indemnity in respect of the cost of proceedings brought before the national courts — General Court not having jurisdiction — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 104(5)) (see paras 44, 45)

4.                     Non-contractual liability — Damage — Damage for which compensation is available — Costs incurred for the proceedings — Not included (Art. 340, second para., TFEU) (see paras 48, 49)

Re:

Operative part