Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62011CO0649

Postanowienie Trybunału (piąta izba) z dnia 3 października 2012 r.
Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega przeciwko Urzędowi Harmonizacji w ramach Rynku Wewnętrznego (znaki towarowe i wzory) (OHIM).
Odwołanie - Wspólnotowy znak towarowy - Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 40/94.
Sprawa C-649/11 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2012:603





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 October 2012 —
Cooperativa Vitivinicola Arousana v OHIM

(Case C-649/11 P)

Appeal – Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(1)(b) – Likelihood of confusion – Word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO – Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROSALIA

1.                     Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1), TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 39)

2.                     Appeals – Grounds – Plea directed against a superfluous ground – Invalid plea in law – Rejection (see para. 55)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2010 in Case T-421/10 Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM – Sotelo Ares , by which the General Court rejected the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2010 (Case R 1804/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between María Constantina Sotelo Ares and Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega.

Operative part

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2.

Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega is ordered to pay the costs.

Top