EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62000CJ0312
Judgment of the Court of 10 December 2002. # Commission of the European Communities v Camar Srl and Tico Srl. # Appeal - Common organisation of the markets - Bananas - Request for additional import licences - Adjustment of tariff quota where necessary - Non-contractual liability of the Community - Action for annulment - Admissibility. # Case C-312/00 P.
Wyrok Trybunału z dnia 10 grudnia 2002 r.
Komisja Wspólnot Europejskich przeciwko Camar Srl i Tico Srl.
Odwołanie - Wspólna organizacja rynku - Skarga o stwierdzenie nieważności - Dopuszczalność.
Sprawa C-312/00 P.
Wyrok Trybunału z dnia 10 grudnia 2002 r.
Komisja Wspólnot Europejskich przeciwko Camar Srl i Tico Srl.
Odwołanie - Wspólna organizacja rynku - Skarga o stwierdzenie nieważności - Dopuszczalność.
Sprawa C-312/00 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2002:736
«(Appeal – Common organisation of the markets – Bananas – Request for additional import licences – Adjustment of tariff quota where necessary – Non-contractual liability of the Community – Action for annulment – Admissibility)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Regulation No 404/93, Art. 19(2) and 30)
(Art. 228 EC, second para.)
(Art. 225 EC; EC Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 51)
(Art. 230 EC, fourth para.; Council Regulation No 404/93, Arts 16(3), 18 and 19(1))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
10 December 2002 (1)
((Appeal – Common organisation of the markets – Bananas – Request for additional import licences – Adjustment of tariff quota where necessary – Non-contractual liability of the Community – Action for annulment – Admissibility))
In Case C-312/00 P, Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. van der Hauwaert and L. Visaggio, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, avvocato, with an address for service in Luxembourg,appellant,
APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 8 June 2000 in Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98 Camar and Tico v Commission and Council [2000] ECR II-2193, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other parties to the proceedings being: Camar Srl, established in Florence (Italy), represented by W. Viscardini Donà, M. Paolin and S. Donà, avvocati, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant at first instance in Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98, Tico Srl, established in Padua (Italy), represented by W. Viscardini Donà, M. Paolin and S. Donà, avvocati, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant at first instance in Case T-117/98, Council of the European Union, represented by F. Ruggeri Laderchi, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg,defendant at first instance in Case T-260/97, French Republic, represented by C. Vasak and G. de Bergues, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,intervener at first instance in Joined Cases T-79/96 and T-260/97, and Italian Republic, represented by U. Leanza, acting as Agent, and by F. Quadri, avvocato dello Stato, with an address for service in Luxembourg,intervener at first instance in Case T-79/96,THE COURT,,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 16 April 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT,
hereby:
Rodríguez Iglesias |
Puissochet |
Wathelet |
Schintgen |
Timmermans |
Gulmann |
Edward |
La Pergola |
Jann |
Skouris |
Macken |
Colneric |
von Bahr |
Cunha Rodrigues |
Rosas |
R. Grass |
G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias |
Registrar |
President |