Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/056/04

    Case C-407/04 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2007 — Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Seamless steel tubes market — Protection of domestic markets — Supply contract — Rights of the defence — Self-incrimination — Anonymous evidence — Fine — Statement of reasons — Equal treatment — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Size of the relevant market and of the undertaking concerned — Attenuating circumstances)

    ĠU C 56, 10.3.2007, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.3.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 56/3


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2007 — Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities

    (Case C-407/04 P) (1)

    (Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Seamless steel tubes market - Protection of domestic markets - Supply contract - Rights of the defence - Self-incrimination - Anonymous evidence - Fine - Statement of reasons - Equal treatment - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Size of the relevant market and of the undertaking concerned - Attenuating circumstances)

    (2007/C 56/04)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Appellant: Dalmine SpA (represented by: A. Sinagra, M. Siragusa, F. Moretti and A. L. Valvo, lawyers)

    Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Whelan and F. Amato, Agents)

    Re:

    Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2004 in Case T-50/00 Dalmine v Commission, partially annulling Commission Decision 2003/382/EC of 8 December 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case IV/E-1/35.860-B seamless steel tubes) (notified under document number C (1999) 4154), and setting the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders Dalmine SpA to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.


    Top