Case T-90/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2017 — Murphy v EUIPO — Nike Innovate (Electronic wristband) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an electronic wristband — Prior Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002)

Kawża T-90/16: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tal-4 ta’ Lulju 2017 – Murphy vs EUIPO– Nike Innovate (Wristband elettronika) [“Disinn Komunitarju — Proċedimenti għal dikjarazzjoni ta’ invalidità — Disinn Komunitarju rreġistrat li jirrappreżenta wristband elettronika — Disinn Komunitarju preċedenti — Raġuni ta’ invalidità — Karattru individwali — Impressjoni globali differenti — Artikolu 6 u Artikolu 25(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 6/2002 — Obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni — Artikolu 62 tar-Regolament Nru 6/2002”]

Kawża T-90/16: Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali tal-4 ta’ Lulju 2017 – Murphy vs EUIPO– Nike Innovate (Wristband elettronika) [“Disinn Komunitarju — Proċedimenti għal dikjarazzjoni ta’ invalidità — Disinn Komunitarju rreġistrat li jirrappreżenta wristband elettronika — Disinn Komunitarju preċedenti — Raġuni ta’ invalidità — Karattru individwali — Impressjoni globali differenti — Artikolu 6 u Artikolu 25(1)(b) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 6/2002 — Obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni — Artikolu 62 tar-Regolament Nru 6/2002”]

ĠU C 277, 21.8.2017, p. 39–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)