Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/056/54

    Case T-53/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 January 2007 — Calavo Growers v OHIM — Calvo Sanz (Calvo) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative mark CALVO — Earlier Community word mark CALAVO — Admissibility of the opposition — Grounds of the opposition lodged in a language other than the language of the proceedings — Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Rule 20(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

    ĠU C 56, 10.3.2007, p. 27–28 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.3.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 56/27


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 January 2007 — Calavo Growers v OHIM — Calvo Sanz (Calvo)

    (Case T-53/05) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative mark CALVO - Earlier Community word mark CALAVO - Admissibility of the opposition - Grounds of the opposition lodged in a language other than the language of the proceedings - Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Rule 20(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

    (2007/C 56/54)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Calavo Growers Inc. (Santa Ana, United States) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Luis Calvo Sanz SA (Carballo, Spain) (represented by J. Rivas Zurdo and E. López Leiva, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 November 2004 (Case R 159/2004-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Calavo Growers Inc. and Luis Calvo Sanz SA.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 November 2004 (Case R 159/2004-1);

    2.

    Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant;

    3.

    Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.


    Top