EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/182/75
Case T-188/05: Action brought on 2 May 2005 by Joël de Bry against the Commission of the European Communities
Case T-188/05: Action brought on 2 May 2005 by Joël de Bry against the Commission of the European Communities
Case T-188/05: Action brought on 2 May 2005 by Joël de Bry against the Commission of the European Communities
ĠU C 182, 23.7.2005, p. 40–40
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 23/07/2005; Data tal-pubblikazzjoni
- Author:
- Il-Qorti tal-Prim’Istanza
- Form:
- Informazzjoni ġudizzjarja
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
23.7.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 182/40 |
Action brought on 2 May 2005 by Joël de Bry against the Commission of the European Communities
(Case T-188/05)
(2005/C 182/75)
Language of the case: French
An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 May 2005 by Joël De Bry, residing in Woluwé-St-Lambert (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
1. |
annul the Commission's decision drawing up the applicant's career development report for 2003. |
|
2. |
order the defendant to pay a symbolic Euro to be increased pending proceedings together with costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of his action, the applicant alleges, first, an objective conflict of interests on the part of his appraiser who is on the same grade.
Furthermore, he claims that errors were made in assessing his merits and argues that there were inconsistencies between the comments and the marks which he was attributed.
Finally, the applicant alleges infringement of the general provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and the aims and objectives sought by the establishment of a new system focused on career development, as well as breach of the obligation to state reasons, the rights of the defence, and Article 26 of the Staff Regulations.
