EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62002CJ0289
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 December 2003. # AMOK Verlags GmbH v A & R Gastronomie GmbH. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Oberlandesgericht München - Germany. # Freedom to provide services - Lawyer established in one Member State working in conjunction with a lawyer established in another Member State - Legal costs to be reimbursed by the unsuccessful party in a dispute to the successful party - Limitation. # Case C-289/02.
2003 m. gruodžio 11 d. Teisingumo Teismo (penktoji kolegija) sprendimas.
AMOK Verlags GmbH prieš A & R Gastronomie GmbH.
Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: Oberlandesgericht München - Vokietija.
Byla C-289/02.
2003 m. gruodžio 11 d. Teisingumo Teismo (penktoji kolegija) sprendimas.
AMOK Verlags GmbH prieš A & R Gastronomie GmbH.
Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: Oberlandesgericht München - Vokietija.
Byla C-289/02.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:669
«(Freedom to provide services – Lawyer established in one Member State working in conjunction with a lawyer established in another Member State – Legal costs to be reimbursed by the unsuccessful party in a dispute to the successful party – Limitation)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
( Arts 49 EC and 50 EC; Council Directive 77/249, Art. 4)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
11 December 2003 (1)
((Freedom to provide services – Lawyer established in one Member State working in conjunction with a lawyer established in another Member State – Legal costs to be reimbursed by the unsuccessful party in a dispute to the successful party – Limitation))
In Case C-289/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between AMOK Verlags GmbHand
A & R Gastronomie GmbH, on the interpretation of Articles 12 EC and 49 EC,THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of A & R Gastronomie GmbH and of the Commission at the hearing on 19 June 2003,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 18 September 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
in answer to the question referred to it by the Oberlandesgericht München by order of 25 July 2002, hereby rules:
Jann |
La Pergola |
von Bahr |
R. Grass |
V. Skouris |
Registrar |
President |