EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32013R0604R(01)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ L 180, 29.6.2013)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ L 180, 29.6.2013)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ L 180, 29.6.2013)
OJ L 49, 25.2.2017, p. 50–50
(BG, CS, DA, DE, EN, MT, SK, SV)
OJ L 49, 25.2.2017, p. 50–70
(HR)
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/604/corrigendum/2017-02-25/oj
|
25.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 49/50 |
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person
( Official Journal of the European Union L 180 of 29 June 2013 )
On page 50, Article 34(5), fourth sentence:
for:
‘If the research carried out by the requested Member State which did not respect the maximum time limit withholds information which shows that it is responsible, that Member State may not invoke the expiry of the time limits provided for in Articles 21, 23 and 24 as a reason for refusing to comply with a request to take charge or take back.’,
read:
‘If the research carried out by the requested Member State which did not respect the maximum time limit yields information which shows that it is responsible, that Member State may not invoke the expiry of the time limits provided for in Articles 21, 23 and 24 as a reason for refusing to comply with a request to take charge or take back.’: