Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2012:355:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 355, 17 November 2012


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.355.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 355

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 55
17 November 2012


Notice No

Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2012/C 355/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 343, 10.11.2012

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2012/C 355/02

Case C-38/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 49 TFEU — Tax legislation — Transfer of residence for tax purposes — Transfer of assets — Immediate exit tax)

2

2012/C 355/03

Case C-43/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias — Greece) — Nomarchiaki Aftodioikisi Aitoloakarnanias and Others v Ipourgos Perivallontos and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directives 85/337/EEC, 92/43/EEC, 2000/60/EC and 2001/42/EC — Community action in the field of water policy — Diversion of the course of a river — Meaning of the time-limit for production of river basin management plans)

2

2012/C 355/04

Case C-262/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Döhler Neuenkirchen GmbH v Hauptzollamt Oldenburg (Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 204(1)(a) — Inward processing procedure — System of suspension — Incurrence of a customs debt — Non-fulfilment of an obligation to supply the bill of discharge within the prescribed period)

4

2012/C 355/05

Case C-28/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Eurogate Distribution GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 204(1)(a) — Customs warehousing procedure — Customs debt incurred through non-fulfilment of an obligation — Delayed entry in stock records of information concerning the removal of goods from a customs warehouse)

4

2012/C 355/06

Case C-36/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Pioneer Hi Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali (Agriculture — Genetically modified organisms — Council Directive 2002/53/EC — Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue — Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 — Article 20 — Existing products — Directive 2001/18/EC — Article 26a — Measures to avoid the unintended presence of genetically modified organisms — National measures prohibiting the cultivation of genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue and authorised as existing products pending measures based on Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC)

5

2012/C 355/07

Case C-150/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 1999/37/EC — Registration documents for vehicles — Vehicles previously registered in another Member State — Change of ownership — Requirement of a roadworthiness test — Requirement of production of a certificate of conformity — Roadworthiness test carried out in another Member State — Non-recognition — Lack of justification)

5

2012/C 355/08

Case C-190/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Daniela Mühlleitner v Ahmad Yusufi, Wadat Yusufi (Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 15(1)(c) — Possible limitation of that jurisdiction to distance contracts)

6

2012/C 355/09

Case C-273/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Baranya Megyei Bíróság — Hungary) — Mecsek-Gabona Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 138(1) — Conditions of exemption for intra-Community transactions characterised by the obligation on the purchaser to ensure, as from the time of their loading, the transport of the goods of which it disposes as owner — Obligation on the vendor to prove that the goods have physically left the territory of the Member State of supply — Removal from the register, with retroactive effect, of the customer’s VAT identification number)

6

2012/C 355/10

Case C-380/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg)) — DI. VI. Finanziaria SAPA di Diego della Valle & C. v Administration des contributions en matière d’impôts (Freedom of establishment — Article 49 TFEU — Tax legislation — Capital tax — Conditions for granting a reduction in capital tax — Situation where a company is no longer liable to capital tax following transfer of its seat to another Member State — Restriction — Justification — Overriding reasons in the public interest)

7

2012/C 355/11

Joined Cases C-422/11 P and C-423/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej and Republic of Poland v European Commission (Appeals — Actions for annulment — Rejection of the appeal as inadmissible — Representation before the Courts of the European Union — Lawyer — Independence)

7

2012/C 355/12

Case C-278/12 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — A. Adil v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 — Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) — Articles 20 and 21 — Abolition of border control at internal borders — Checks within the territory — Measures having an equivalent effect to border checks — National legislation authorising checks of identity, nationality and residence status by officials responsible for border surveillance and monitoring of foreign nationals in a 20 kilometre area extending from the common border with other State parties to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Checks intended to combat illegal residence — Legislation laying down certain conditions and guarantees concerning, inter alia, the frequency and intensity of the checks)

8

2012/C 355/13

Case C-373/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Prešov Regional Court) lodged on 3 August 2012 — G.I.C. Cash, a.s. v Marián Gunčaga

8

2012/C 355/14

Case C-392/12 P: Appeal brought on 22 August 2012 by Fruit of the Loom, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 21 June 2012 in Case T-514/10: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

9

2012/C 355/15

Case C-398/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Fermo (Italy) lodged on 29 August 2012 — Criminal proceedings against M

9

2012/C 355/16

Case C-411/12: Action brought on 7 September 2012 — European Commission v Italian Republic

10

2012/C 355/17

Case C-414/12 P: Appeal brought on 13 September 2012 by Bolloré against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Second Chamber) on 27 June 2012 in Case T-372/10 Bolloré v Commission

10

2012/C 355/18

Case C-421/12: Action brought on 13 September 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

11

2012/C 355/19

Case C-423/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm, Migrationsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 17 September 2012 — Flora May Reyes v Migrationsverket

11

2012/C 355/20

Case C-427/12: Action brought on 19 September 2012 — European Commission v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

12

2012/C 355/21

Case C-432/12 P: Appeal brought on 24 September 2012 by Leifheit AG against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2012 in Case T-334/10 Leifheit AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

12

2012/C 355/22

Case C-433/12 P: Appeal brought on 26 September 2012 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 July 2012 in Case T-27/12 Marcuccio v Court of Justice

13

 

General Court

2012/C 355/23

Case T-343/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Shell Petroleum and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint control — Fines — Aggravating circumstances — Role of instigator and leader — Repeated infringement — Duration of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Unlimited jurisdiction — Conduct of the undertaking during the administrative procedure)

14

2012/C 355/24

Case T-344/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Total v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement)

14

2012/C 355/25

Case T-347/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Nynäs Petroleum and Nynas Belgium v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value — Equal treatment)

14

2012/C 355/26

Case T-348/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Total Nederland v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Continuous nature of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement)

15

2012/C 355/27

Case T-351/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Dura Vermeer Groep v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)

15

2012/C 355/28

Case T-352/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Dura Vermeer Infra v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence)

15

2012/C 355/29

Case T-353/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Vermeer Infrastructuur v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)

16

2012/C 355/30

Case T-354/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — BAM NBM Wegenbouw and HBG Civiel v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements — Rights of the defence — Fines — Duration of the infringement)

16

2012/C 355/31

Case T-355/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke BAM Groep v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Duration of the infringement)

16

2012/C 355/32

Case T-356/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)

17

2012/C 355/33

Case T-357/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Rights of the defence — Fine — Aggravating circumstances — Role of instigator and leader — Absence of cooperation — Commission's powers of investigation — Right to the assistance of a lawyer — Misuse of powers — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Duration of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)

17

2012/C 355/34

Case T-359/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans Infrastructuur v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Burden of proof — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)

18

2012/C 355/35

Case T-360/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)

18

2012/C 355/36

Case T-361/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ballast Nedam v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence — Effects in relation to third parties of a judgment annulling a measure)

18

2012/C 355/37

Case T-362/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ballast Nedam Infra v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Proof of the infringement — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence — Production of new pleas in the course of proceedings — Unlimited jurisdiction)

19

2012/C 355/38

Case T-370/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Kuwait Petroleum and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence)

19

2012/C 355/39

Case T-82/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for flat glass in the EEA — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Evidence of the infringement — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Exclusion of captive sales — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances)

19

2012/C 355/40

Case T-535/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Tuzzi fashion v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (Emidio Tucci) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Earlier national word mark and international registration TUZZI — Earlier company name Tuzzi fashion GmbH — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 73 and Article 62(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 and Article 64(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts by the adjudicatory body of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Article 79 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009)

20

2012/C 355/41

Case T-139/09: Judgment of the General Court of (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — France v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ seeking to support the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Co-financing by a public institution and by voluntary contributions from farmers’ organisations — Arguments not raised during the administrative procedure — Duty to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

20

2012/C 355/42

Case T-243/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Fedecom v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Joint financing by a public body and by voluntary contributions from producer organisations — Arguments contrary to the facts submitted during the administrative proceedings — Operating aid — Legitimate expectation)

21

2012/C 355/43

Case T-328/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Producteurs de légumes de France v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market — Legitimate expectation — Material error in the calculation of the amounts to be recovered)

21

2012/C 355/44

Case T-357/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Pucci International v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (Emidio Tucci) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Earlier Community figurative and national word and figurative marks Emilio Pucci and EMILIO PUCCI — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)

21

2012/C 355/45

Case T-373/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Pucci International (Emidio Tucci) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Earlier Community figurative and national word and figurative marks Emilio Pucci and EMILIO PUCCI — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

22

2012/C 355/46

Case T-387/09: Judgment of the General Court of (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — Applied Microengineering v Commission (Fifth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration — Contracts concerning the projects ‘Formation of a New Design House for MST’ and ‘Assessment of a New Anodic Bonder’ — Recovery of part of the financial contribution paid — Enforceable decision — Decision amending the contested decision during the proceedings — Legal basis of the action — Nature of the pleas put forward — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Principle of sound administration)

22

2012/C 355/47

Case T-465/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — Jurašinović v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Request for access to reports of European Union observers present in Croatia from 1 to 31 August 1995 — Refusal to grant access — Risk of undermining the protection of international relations — Previous disclosure)

23

2012/C 355/48

Case T-39/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Pucci International (PUCCI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark PUCCI — Earlier national figurative and word marks Emidio Tucci and E. TUCCI — Application for the earlier Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) and Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)

23

2012/C 355/49

Case T-63/10: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — Jurašinović v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Request for access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia during proceedings — Refusal to grant access — Risk of undermining the protection of international relations — Risk of undermining the protection of judicial proceedings and legal advice)

23

2012/C 355/50

Case T-160/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — J v Parliament (Right of petition — Petition addressed to the European Parliament — Decision to take no further action — Action for annulment — Duty to state reasons — Petition not falling within an area of activity of the European Union)

24

2012/C 355/51

Case T-215/10: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2012 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Cotton — Aid to the least well-off — Rural development — Effectiveness of supervision — Proportionality)

24

2012/C 355/52

Case T-257/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Force of res judicata — Duty to state reasons)

24

2012/C 355/53

Case T-303/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Wam Industriale v Commission (State aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Execution of a judgment of the General Court — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Duty to exercise diligence — Duty of care)

25

2012/C 355/54

Case T-312/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2012 — ELE.SI.A v Commission (Arbitration clause — Sixth multiannual framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) — Contract concerning the ‘I-Way, Intelligent, co-operative system in cars for road safety’ project — Termination of the contract — Request for repayment of the financial contribution paid — Damages — Action seeking to obtain the full financial contribution requested and to challenge the request for repayment — Counterclaim)

25

2012/C 355/55

Case T-584/10: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2012 –Yilmaz v OHIM — Tequila Cuervo (TEQUILA MATADOR HECHO EN MEXICO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark TEQUILA MATADOR HECHO EN MEXICO — Earlier national and international word marks MATADOR — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

26

2012/C 355/56

Case T-501/10: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2012 — TI Media Broadcasting and TI Media v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Italian pay-TV market — Decision modifying the commitments attached to a decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the EEA agreement — Call for tenders for the award of digital terrestrial television frequencies in Italy — Action devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Inadmissibility)

26

2012/C 355/57

Case T-52/12 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 September 2012 — Greece v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Compensation payments made in 2008 and 2009 by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of the decision — Prima facie case — Urgency — Weighing up of interests)

27

2012/C 355/58

Case T-162/12: Action brought on 25 September 2012 — CW v Council

27

2012/C 355/59

Case T-363/12: Action brought on 8 August 2012 — Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC natural beauty)

27

2012/C 355/60

Case T-364/12: Action brought on 8 August 2012 — Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC Kindii)

28

2012/C 355/61

Case T-379/12: Action brought on 21 August 2012 — Electric Bike World v OHIM — Brunswick (LIFECYCLE)

28

2012/C 355/62

Case T-382/12: Action brought on 24 August 2012 — Kampol v OHIM — Colmol (Nobel)

29

2012/C 355/63

Case T-383/12: Action brought on 24 August 2012 — Ferienhäuser zum See v OHIM — Sunparks Groep (Sun Park Holidays)

29

2012/C 355/64

Case T-386/12: Action brought on 30 August 2012 — Elite Licensing v OHIM — Aguas De Mondariz Fuente del Val (elite BY MONDARIZ)

30

2012/C 355/65

Case T-390/12: Action brought on 5 September 2012 — Lifted Research and LRG Europe/OHIM — Fei Liangchen (Lr geans)

30

2012/C 355/66

Case T-391/12: Action brought on 5 September 2012 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Unipapel Industria Comercio y Servicios (UNITED OFFICE)

31

2012/C 355/67

Case T-393/12: Action brought on 4 September 2012 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO)

32

2012/C 355/68

Case T-395/12: Action brought on 4 September 2012 — Fetim v OHIM — Solid Floor (Solidfloor The professional's choice)

32

2012/C 355/69

Case T-407/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (Ubee Interactive)

33

2012/C 355/70

Case T-408/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (ubee)

33

2012/C 355/71

Case T -410/12: Action brought on 6 September 2012 — Vitaminaqua Ltd v OHIM

34

2012/C 355/72

Case T-415/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Xeda International and Others v Commission

34

2012/C 355/73

Case T-416/12: Action brought on 20 September 2012 — HP Health Clubs Iberia v OHIM — Shiseido (ZENSATIONS)

35

2012/C 355/74

Case T-422/12: Action brought on 26 September 2012 — Kappa Filter Systems v OHIM (THE FUTURE HAS ZERO EMISSIONS)

35

2012/C 355/75

Case T-423/12: Action brought on 27 September 2012 — Skype v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (skype)

36

2012/C 355/76

Case T-425/12: Action brought on 26 September 2012 — Sport Eybl & Sports Experts v OHIM — Elite Licensing (e)

36

2012/C 355/77

Case T-430/12: Action brought on 2 October 2012 — Heinrich v OHIM — Commission (European Network Rapid Manufacturing)

37

2012/C 355/78

Case T-583/10: Order of the General Court of 26 September 2012 — Deutsche Telekom v OHIM TeliaSonera Denmark (Nuance de magenta)

37

2012/C 355/79

Case T-452/11: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission

37

2012/C 355/80

Case T-484/11: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2012 — Skyhawke Technologies v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (SKYCADDIE)

38

2012/C 355/81

Case T-60/12: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission

38

2012/C 355/82

Case T-116/12: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Tioxide Europe and Others v Council

38

2012/C 355/83

Case T-212/12: Order of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ålands Industrihus v Commission

38

 

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2012/C 355/84

Case F-86/12: Action brought on 9 August 2012 — ZZ v Commission

39

2012/C 355/85

Case F-97/12: Action brought on 17 September 2012 — ZZ v Commission

39


EN

 

Top