Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2012:080:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 80, 17 March 2012


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.080.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 80

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 55
17 March 2012


Notice No

Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2012/C 080/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 73, 10.3.2012

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2012/C 080/02

Case C-545/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2012 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Convention defining the Statute of the European Schools — Interpretation and application of Articles 12(4)(a) and 25(1) — Right of seconded teachers to access to the same progression in status and pay as those enjoyed by their national counterparts — Exclusion of certain teachers seconded by the United Kingdom to the European Schools from access to improved pay scales and other additional payments available to their national counterparts — Incompatibility with Articles 12(4)(a) and 25(1))

2

2012/C 080/03

Case C-210/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Bíróság — Hungary) — Márton Urbán v Vám- és Pénzügyőrség Észak-alföldi Regionális Parancsnoksága (Road transport — Breach of the rules on the use of the tachograph — Obligation on Member States to establish proportionate penalties — Flat-rate fine — Proportionality of the penalty)

2

2012/C 080/04

Case C-249/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2012 — Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC) (Appeal — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Articles 2(7), 9(5) and 17(3) — Market economy treatment — Individual treatment — Sampling)

3

2012/C 080/05

Case C-277/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Directives 93/83/EEC, 2001/29/EC, 2006/115/EC and 2006/116/EC — Sharing of the rights to exploit a cinematographic work, by contract, between the principal director and the producer of the work — National legislation allotting those rights, exclusively and by operation of law, to the film producer — Possibility of departing from that rule by an agreement between the parties — Subsequent rights to remuneration)

4

2012/C 080/06

Case C-553/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 2 November 2011 — Bernhard Rintisch v Klaus Eder

5

2012/C 080/07

Case C-601/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2011 by the French Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 9 September 2011 in Case T-257/07 France v Commission

5

2012/C 080/08

Case C-609/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2011 by Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 September 2011 in Case T-427/09 centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

6

2012/C 080/09

Case C-610/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2011 by Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 September 2011 in Case T-434/09 Centrotherm Systemtechnik v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

7

2012/C 080/10

Case C-614/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 30 November 2011 — Niederösterreichische Landes-Landwirtschaftskammer v Anneliese Kuso

8

2012/C 080/11

Case C-628/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2011 — Proceedings for a financial penalty against International Jet Management GmbH

9

2012/C 080/12

Case C-642/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad — Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 December 2011 — EOOD Stroy Trans v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — gr. Varna pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia po Prihodite

9

2012/C 080/13

Case C-643/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varneski administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 15 December 2011 — LVK-56 ЕООD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — grad Varna pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia za Prihodite

10

2012/C 080/14

Case C-645/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2011 — Land Berlin v Ellen Mirjam Sapir and Others

11

2012/C 080/15

Case C-664/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 30 December 2011 — Serveis en Impressió i Retolació Vargas, S.L. v Banco Mare Nostrum, S.A.

11

2012/C 080/16

Case C-665/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 30 December 2011 — Alfonso Carlos Amselem Almor v NCG Banco, S.A.

12

2012/C 080/17

Case C-4/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Sardegna (Italy) lodged on 2 January 2012 — Danilo Tola v Ministero della Difesa

12

2012/C 080/18

Case C-23/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Latvia) lodged on 17 January 2012 — Mohamad Zakaria

12

2012/C 080/19

Case C-48/12: Action brought on 31 January 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

13

2012/C 080/20

Case C-50/12 P: Appeal brought on 1 February 2012 by Kendrion NV against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 16 November 2011 in Case T-54/06 Kendrion v Commission

14

 

General Court

2012/C 080/21

Case T-76/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — EI du Pont de Nemours and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint venture — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation)

15

2012/C 080/22

Case T-77/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Dow Chemical v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint venture — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation)

15

2012/C 080/23

Case T-83/08: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Denki Kagaku Kogyo and Denka Chemicals v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for chloroprene rubber — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Proof of participation in the cartel — Proof of having distanced oneself from the cartel — Duration of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Guidelines on the method of setting — Non-retroactivity — Legitimate expectation — Principle of proportionality — Mitigating circumstances)

16

2012/C 080/24

Case T-321/09: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — skytron energy v OHIM (arraybox) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark arraybox — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

16

2012/C 080/25

Case T-469/09: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenses excluded from Community financing — Tomato processing and rice storage sectors — Integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes — Principle of proportionality)

16

2012/C 080/26

Case T-305/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Hartmann-Lamboy v OHIM — Diptyque (DYNIQUE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DYNIQUE — Earlier Community word mark DIPTYQUE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

17

2012/C 080/27

Case T-387/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Goutier v OHIM — Euro Data (ARANTAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ARANTAX — Earlier national word mark ANTAX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

17

2012/C 080/28

Case T-424/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Dosenbach-Ochsner v OHIM — Sisma (Representation of elephants in a rectangle) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark representing elephants in a rectangle — Earlier international and national figurative marks representing an elephant and earlier national word mark elefanten — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Distinctive character of the earlier marks)

17

2012/C 080/29

Case T-596/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Almunia Textil v OHIM — FIBA-Europe (EuroBasket) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark EuroBasket — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

18

2012/C 080/30

Case T-64/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2012 — Run2Day Franchise v OHIM — Runners Point (Run2) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Run2 — Earlier Community word and figurative marks RUN2DAY — Earlier BENELUX figurative mark RUN2DATE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

18

2012/C 080/31

Case T-315/10: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2012 — Groupe Partouche v Commission (Action for annulment — Concentrations — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Inadmissibility)

18

2012/C 080/32

Case T-607/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 January 2012 — Henkel and Henkel France v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Commission decision refusing to transmit documents to a national competition authority — Application for interim measures — No interest in bringing proceedings — Disregard of formal requirements — Measures requested not provisional in character — Inadmissibility)

19

2012/C 080/33

Case T-637/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — Euris Consult v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Public services contract — Tendering procedure — Services of translation into Maltese — Rejection of a tender — Arrangements for communication — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Loss of opportunity — Lack of serious and irreparable damage — Lack of urgency)

19

2012/C 080/34

Case T-674/11: Action brought on 30 December 2011 — TV2/Danmark v Commission

19

2012/C 080/35

Case T-1/12: Action brought on 2 January 2012 — France v Commission

20

2012/C 080/36

Case T-18/12: Action brought on 9 January 2012 — Interbev v European Commission

21

2012/C 080/37

Case T-22/12: Action brought on 16 January 2012 — Fomanu v OHIM (Qualität hat Zukunft)

22

2012/C 080/38

Case T-26/12: Action brought on 20 January 2012 — PT Musim Mas v Council

22

2012/C 080/39

Case T-29/12: Action brought on 17 January 2012 — Bauer v OHIM — BenQ Materials (Daxon)

23

2012/C 080/40

Case T-33/12: Action brought on 23 January 2012 — Piotrowski v OHIM (MEDIGYM)

24

2012/C 080/41

Case T-34/12: Action brought on 25 January 2012 — Herbacin cosmetic v OHIM — Laboratoire Garnier (HERBA SHINE)

24

2012/C 080/42

Case T-36/12: Action brought on 20 January 2012 — Athens Resort Casino v Commission

25

2012/C 080/43

Case T-43/12: Action brought on 30 January 2012 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council

25

2012/C 080/44

Case T-337/09: Order of the General Court of 6 February 2012 — Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Valencia v Commission

26

2012/C 080/45

Case T-298/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Ghost Brand v OHIM — Procter & Gamble International Operations (GHOST)

26

2012/C 080/46

Case T-300/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Otto v OHIM — Nalsani (TOTTO)

26

2012/C 080/47

Case T-362/11: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission

26

2012/C 080/48

Case T-397/11: Order of the General Court of 26 January 2012 — Symfiliosi v FRA

26


EN

 

Top