Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2010:100:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 100, 17 April 2010


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.100.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 100

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 53
17 April 2010


Notice No

Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice

2010/C 100/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 80, 27.3.2010

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2010/C 100/02

Case C-172/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Roma, Italy) — Pontina Ambiente Srl v Regione Lazio (Environment — Directive 1999/31/EC — Article 10 — Special levy on the disposal of solid waste in landfills — Operator of a landfill subject to that levy — Operating costs of a landfill — Directive 2000/35/EC — Default interest)

2

2010/C 100/03

Case C-310/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, United Kingdom) — London Borough of Harrow v Nimco Hassan Ibrahim, Secretary of State for the Home Department (Freedom of movement for persons — Right of residence of a national of a non-member country who is the spouse of a national of a Member State, and of their children who are themselves nationals of a Member State — National of a Member State ceasing to work and leaving the host Member State — Enrolment of the children at a school — No means of subsistence — Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 — Article 12 — Directive 2004/38)

3

2010/C 100/04

Case C-337/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X Holding B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Articles 43 EC and 48 EC — Tax legislation — Corporation tax — Tax entity consisting of a resident parent company and one or more resident subsidiaries — Taxation of profits at parent-company level — Exclusion of non-resident subsidiaries)

3

2010/C 100/05

Case C-381/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Car Trim GmbH v KeySafety Systems Srl (Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 5(1)(b) — Jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Determination of the place of performance of the obligation — Criteria for distinguishing between ‘sale of goods’ and ‘provision of services’)

4

2010/C 100/06

Case C-386/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Brita GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (EC-Israel Association Agreement — Territorial scope — EC-PLO Association Agreement — Refusal to apply to products originating in the West Bank the preferential tariff arrangements granted for products originating in Israel — Doubts as to the origin of the products — Approved exporter — Subsequent verification of invoice declarations by the customs authorities of the importing State — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties — Principle of the relative effect of treaties)

4

2010/C 100/07

Case C-408/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), CMS Hasche Sigle (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Articles 55(1)(a) and 7(1)(c) — Interest in bringing an application for a declaration of invalidity of a trade mark based on an absolute ground for invalidity — Law firm — Word sign ‘COLOR EDITION’ — Descriptive character of a word mark composed of descriptive elements)

5

2010/C 100/08

Case C-480/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, United Kingdom) — Maria Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth, Secretary of State for the Home Department (Freedom of movement for persons — Right of residence — National of a Member State who worked in another Member State and remained there after ceasing to work — Child in vocational training in the host Member State — No means of subsistence — Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 — Article 12 — Directive 2004/38/EC)

6

2010/C 100/09

Case C-562/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Germany) — Müller Fleisch GmbH v Land Baden-Württemberg (System for monitoring bovine spongiform encephalopathy — Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 — Bovine animals over 30 months of age — Slaughter under normal conditions — Meat intended for human consumption — Mandatory screening test — National rules — Obligation to screen — Extension — Bovine animals over 24 months of age)

7

2010/C 100/10

Case C-25/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Republic of Hungary)) — Sió-Eckes kft. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve (Common agricultural policy — Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 — Common organisation of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products — Regulation (EC) No 1535/2003 — Aid scheme for products processed from fruit and vegetables — Processed products — Peaches in syrup and/or in natural fruit juice — Finished products)

7

2010/C 100/11

Case C-170/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/60/EC — Money laundering and terrorist financing — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

8

2010/C 100/12

Case C-209/09: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Lahti Energia Oy (Directive 2000/76/EC — Incineration of waste — Incineration plant — Co-incineration plant — Complex comprising a gas plant and a power plant — Incineration in the power plant of non-purified gas produced from the thermal treatment of waste in the gas plant)

9

2010/C 100/13

Case C-295/09: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/43/EC — Company law — Statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

9

2010/C 100/14

Case C-330/09: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/43/EC — Company law — Statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

10

2010/C 100/15

Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08: Order of the President of the Court of 16 December 2009 (references for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, and the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom)) — Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton, Derek Owen (C-403/08), Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-429/08) (References for a preliminary ruling — Application to participate in the proceedings — Rejection)

10

2010/C 100/16

Case C-513/08 P: Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission (Appeal — Officials — Social security — Express refusal of an application for reimbursement of 100 % of certain medical expenses incurred by the official — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

11

2010/C 100/17

Case C-528/08 P: Order of the Court of 9 December 2009 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission (Appeal — Officials — Social security — Implied refusal of a request for 100 % reimbursement of certain medical costs incurred by an official — Order of declining jurisdiction from the Civil Service Tribunal — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

11

2010/C 100/18

Case C-579/08 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2010 — Messer Group GmbH v Air Products and Chemicals Inc., Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word marks Ferromix, Inomix and Alumix — Earlier word marks FERROMAXX, INOMAXX and ALUMAXX — Opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark — Relevant public — Degree of similarity — Limited distinctive character of the earlier mark — Likelihood of confusion)

12

2010/C 100/19

Case C-69/09 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2010 — Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Makhteshim-Agan Italia Srl, Magan Italia Srl v European Commission (Expedited procedure)

12

2010/C 100/20

Joined Cases C-292/09 and C-293/09: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy)) — Isabella Calestani (C-292/09), Paolo Lunardi (C-293/09) v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

13

2010/C 100/21

Case C-449/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 18 November 2009 — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria

13

2010/C 100/22

Case C-547/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Austria) lodged on 28 December 2009 — Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Andrea Schwab

14

2010/C 100/23

Case C-17/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 11 January 2010 — Toshiba Corporation, Areva T&D Holding SA, Areva T&D SA, Areva T&D AG, Mitsubishi Electric Corp., Alstom, Fuji Electric Holdings Co. Ltd, Fuji Electric Systems Co. Ltd, Siemens Transmission & Distribution SA, Siemens AG Österreich, VA TECH Transmission & Distribution GmbH & Co. KEG, Siemens AG, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi Europe Ltd, Japan AE Power Systems Corp., Nuova Magrini Galileo SpA v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže

14

2010/C 100/24

Case C-23/10: Action brought on 14 January 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

15

2010/C 100/25

Case C-25/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium), lodged on 15 January 2010 — Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach e.V. v État belge — Service Public Fédéral Finances

17

2010/C 100/26

Case C-30/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Linköpings tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 19 January 2010 — Lotta Andersson v Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmyndigheten

17

2010/C 100/27

Case C-31/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 20 January 2010 — MINERVA Kulturreisen GmbH v Finanzamt Freital

18

2010/C 100/28

Case C-32/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven Kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 20 January 2010 — Toni Georgiev Semerdzhiev v Del-Pi-Krasimira Mancheva

18

2010/C 100/29

Case C-34/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 21 January 2010 — Prof. Dr. Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace e.V.

19

2010/C 100/30

Case C-37/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 22 January 2010 — Landwirtschaftliches Unternehmen e.G. Sondershausen v BVVG Bodenverwertungs- und -verwaltungs GmbH

20

2010/C 100/31

Case C-42/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium), lodged on 25 January 2010 — 1. Vlaamse Dierenartsenvereniging VZW, 2. Marc Janssens v Belgische Staat; intervener: Luk Vangheluwe

20

2010/C 100/32

Case C-43/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 25 January 2010 — Nomarkhiaki Aftodiikisi Aitoloakarnanias and Others, Elliniki Etairia gia tin Prostasia tou Perivallontos kai tis Politistikis Klironomias and Others and Pagkosmio Tamio gia ti Fisi — WWF Ellas v Ipourgos Perivallontos, Khorotaxias kai Dimosion Ergon and Others

20

2010/C 100/33

Case C-44/10: Action brought on 28 January 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

23

2010/C 100/34

Case C-45/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 28 January 2010 — 1. Vlaamse Dierenartsenvereniging VZW, 2. Marc Janssens v Belgian State

23

2010/C 100/35

Case C-48/10: Action brought on 28 January 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

24

2010/C 100/36

Case C-50/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

24

2010/C 100/37

Case C-52/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 1 February 2010 — Eleftheri Tileorasi A.E. ‘Alter Channel’ and Konstantinos Giannikos v Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis and Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis

25

2010/C 100/38

Case C-57/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 28 January 2010 — Vlaamse Dierenartsenvereniging VZW v Belgische Staat

25

2010/C 100/39

Case C-58/10, Case C-59/10, Case C-60/10, Case C-61/10, Case C-62/10, Case C-63/10, Case C-64/10, Case C-65/10, Case C-66/10, Case C-67/10, Case C-68/10: References for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 3 February 2010 in Cases — Monsanto SAS, Monsanto Agriculture France SAS, Monsanto International SARL, Monsanto Technology LLC v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Monsanto SAS, Monsanto Agriculture France SAS, Monsanto International SARL, Monsanto Europe SA v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Association générale des producteurs de maïs (AGPM) v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — SCEA de Malaprade, SCEA Coutin, Jérôme Huard, Dominique Richer, EARL de Candelon, Bernard Mir, EARL des Menirs, Marie-Jeanne Darricau, GAEC de Commenian v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Pioneer Génétique, Pioneer Semences v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Syndicat des établissements de semences agréés pour les semences de maïs (SEPROMA) v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Caussade Semences SA v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Société Limagrain Verneuil Holding v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Société Maïsadour Semences v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Ragt Semences SA v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche — Euralis Semences SAS, Euralis Coop v Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche

26

2010/C 100/40

Case C-69/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 5 February 2010 — Brahim Samba Diouf v Ministre du Travail, de l'Emploi et de l'Immigration

27

2010/C 100/41

Case C-72/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 9 February 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Marcello Costa

27

2010/C 100/42

Case C-77/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corta Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 9 February 2010 — Ugo Cifone v Giudice delle indagini preliminari del Tribunale di Trani

28

2010/C 100/43

Case C-80/10: Action brought on 11 February 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

28

2010/C 100/44

Case C-84/10 P: Appeal brought on 12 February 2010 by Longevity Health Products, Inc against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 9 December 2009 in Case T-484/08 Longevity Health Products, Inc v OHIM — Merck (Kids Vids)

29

2010/C 100/45

Case C-87/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Vicenza — Sezione distaccata di Schio (Italy) lodged on 15 February 2010 — Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA

30

2010/C 100/46

Case C-88/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Palermo (Italy) lodged on 15 February 2010 — Assessorato del Lavoro e della Previdenza Sociale v Seasoft SpA

30

2010/C 100/47

Case C-94/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 17 February 2010 — Danfoss A/S and Sauer-Danfoss ApS v Skatteministeriet

32

2010/C 100/48

Case C-105/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 25 February 2010 — Public prosecutor v Malik Gataev, Khadizhat Gataeva

32

2010/C 100/49

Case C-525/08: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 15 January 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany) — Sylvia Bienek v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

34

2010/C 100/50

Case C-313/09: Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

34

2010/C 100/51

Case C-328/09: Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

34

 

General Court

2010/C 100/52

Case T-16/04: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — Arcelor v Parliament and Council (Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Action for annulment — Lack of direct and individual concern — Action for damages — Admissibility — Sufficiently serious breach of a higher-ranking rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Right to property — Freedom to pursue a trade or profession — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Legal certainty)

35

2010/C 100/53

Case T-70/05: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EMSA (Public service contracts — EMSA tendering procedures — Provision of information technology services — Rejection of the tender — Action for annulment — Jurisdiction of the Court — Non-compliance of a tender — Equal treatment — Compliance with the award criteria set out in the tender specifications or the contract notice — Establishment of sub-criteria for the award criteria — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based)

35

2010/C 100/54

Case T-163/05: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — Bundesverband deutscher Banken v Commission (State aid — Transfer of public assets to Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale — Decision declaring the aid to be, in part, incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Private investor test — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

36

2010/C 100/55

Case T-429/05: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — Artegodan v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Medicinal products for human use — Decision requiring the withdrawal of marketing authorisations — Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court of First Instance — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

36

2010/C 100/56

Case T-36/06: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — Bundesverband deutscher Banken v Commission (State aid — Transfer of public assets to Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale — Decision finding that the notified measure does not constitute aid — Private investor test — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Serious difficulties)

37

2010/C 100/57

Joined Cases T-102/07 and T-120/07: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by Germany in the form of a participation and loan guarantees — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the common market — General aid scheme approved by the Commission — Concept of a firm in difficulty — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty — Amount of aid — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

37

2010/C 100/58

Case T-321/07: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten v OHIM — Applus Servicios Tecnológicos (A+) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark A+ — Earlier Community word mark AirPlus International — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Lack of similarity between the signs — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 73, 74 and 79 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 75, 76 and 83 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

38

2010/C 100/59

Case T-248/08 P: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — Doktor v Council (Appeal — Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Probationary period — Continuation of probationary period — Report at the end of the probationary period — Article 34 of the Staff Regulations — Distortion of facts and evidence — Obligation on the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons)

38

2010/C 100/60

Case T-11/09: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2010 — Özdemir v OHIM — Aktieselskabet af 21 november 2001 (James Jones) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark James Jones — Earlier Community word mark JACK & JONES — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

39

2010/C 100/61

Case T-408/07: Order of the General Court of 4 February 2010 — Crunch Fitness International v OHIM — ILG (CRUNCH) (Community trade mark — Revocation — Withdrawal of the request for revocation — No need to adjudicate)

39

2010/C 100/62

Case T-456/07: Order of the General Court of 12 February 2010 — Commission v CdT (Action for annulment — Community pension scheme — Obligation on CdT to pay a contribution in connection with the budget years 1998 to 2005 — Non-actionable measure — Measure not producing legal effects in respect of third parties — Manifest inadmissibility)

40

2010/C 100/63

Case T-481/08: Order of the General Court of 8 February 2010 — Alisei v Commission (Action for annulment — External action and EDF — Termination of audit and adoption of final report — Measure of a purely contractual nature — Lack of jurisdiction — No direct concern — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Manifest inadmissibility)

40

2010/C 100/64

Case T-18/10: Action brought on 11 January 2010 — Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami e.a. v Parliament and Council

41

2010/C 100/65

Case T-21/10: Action brought on 25 January 2010 — Germany v Commission

42

2010/C 100/66

Case T-22/10: Action brought on 25 January 2010 — Esprit International v OHIM — Marc O’Polo International (Representation of the letter ‘e’ on a trouser pocket)

42

2010/C 100/67

Case T-24/10: Action brought on 27 January 2010 — CECA v Commission

43

2010/C 100/68

Case T-25/10: Action brought on 27 January 2010 — BASF Specialty Chemicals and BASF Lampertheim v Commission

44

2010/C 100/69

Case T-26/10: Action brought on 25 January 2010 — Alibaba Group v OHIM — allpay.net (ALIPAY)

45

2010/C 100/70

Case T-27/10: Action brought on 27 January 2010 — AC-Treuhand v Commission

45

2010/C 100/71

Case T-34/10: Action brought on 26 January 2010 — Hairdreams v OHIM — Bartmann (MAGIC LIGHT)

46

2010/C 100/72

Case T-35/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — Bank Melli Iran v Council

47

2010/C 100/73

Case T-36/10: Action brought on 1 February 2010 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission

48

2010/C 100/74

Case T-39/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Pucci International (PUCCI)

49

2010/C 100/75

Case T-40/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — Elf Aquitaine v Commission

49

2010/C 100/76

Case T-41/10: Action brought on 2 February 2010 — SIMS — Ecole de ski internationale v OHIM — SNMSF (esf école du ski français)

50

2010/C 100/77

Case T-43/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — Elementis e.a. v Commission

51

2010/C 100/78

Case T-45/10: Action brought on 28 January 2010 — GEA Group v Commission

52

2010/C 100/79

Case T-46/10: Action brought on 28 January 2010 — Faci v Commission

53

2010/C 100/80

Case T-47/10: Action brought on 27 January 2010 — Akzo Nobel e.a. v Commission

54

2010/C 100/81

Case T-48/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Herbert Meister against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 30 November 2009 in Case F-17/09, Meister v OHIM

55

2010/C 100/82

Case T-49/10: Action brought on 5 February 2010 — The Footwear Co. Ltd v OHIM — Reno Schuhcentrum (swiss cross FOOTWEAR)

56

2010/C 100/83

Case T-53/10: Action brought on 5 February 2010 — Riesenthel v OHIM — Dynamic Promotion (Hampers, crates and baskets)

56

2010/C 100/84

Case T-59/10: Action brought on 9 February 2010 — Geemarc Telecom v OHIM — Audioline (AMPLIDECT)

57

2010/C 100/85

Case T-60/10: Action brought on 10 February 2010 — Jackson International v OHIM — Royal Shakespeare (ROYAL SHAKESPEARE)

57

2010/C 100/86

Case T-61/10: Action brought on 8 February 2010 — Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission

58

2010/C 100/87

Case T-65/10: Action brought on 11 February 2010 — Spain v Commission

59

2010/C 100/88

Case T-67/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Spain v Commission

60

2010/C 100/89

Case T-68/10: Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Sphere Time v OHIM — Punch (watches)

60

2010/C 100/90

Case T-69/10: Action brought on 18 February 2010 — IRO v Commission

61

2010/C 100/91

Case T-70/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission

61

2010/C 100/92

Case T-71/10: Action brought on 18 February 2010 — Xeda International and Pace International v Commission

62

2010/C 100/93

Case T-73/10 P: Appeal brought on 17 February 2010 by Apostolov against the Order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal made on 15 December 2009 in case Apostolov v Commission, F-8/09

63

2010/C 100/94

Case T-74/10: Action brought on 16 February 2010 — Flaco Geräte v OHIM — Delgado Sánchez (FLACO)

64

2010/C 100/95

Case T-81/10: Action brought on 24 February 2010 — Tempus Vade v OHIM — Palacios Serrano (AIR FORCE)

64

2010/C 100/96

Case T-83/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Riva Fire SpA v European Commission

65

2010/C 100/97

Case T-85/10: Action brought on 18 February 2010 — Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission

66

2010/C 100/98

Case T-87/10: Action brought on 23 February 2010 — Chestnut Medical Technologies v OHIM (PIPELINE)

67

2010/C 100/99

Case T-89/10: Action brought on 24 February 2010 — Republic of Hungary v European Commission

67

 

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2010/C 100/00

Case F-3/10: Action brought on 15 January 2010 — AB v European Commission

69

2010/C 100/01

Case F-7/10: Action brought on 19 January 2010 — Garcia Lledo and Others v OHIM

69

2010/C 100/02

Case F-8/10: Action brought on 25 January 2010 — Gheysens v Council

69

2010/C 100/03

Case F-10/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — Hecq v Commission

70


EN

 

Top