Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TB0466

Case T-466/11: Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Ellinika Nafpigeia and Hoern v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Shipbuilding — Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard — Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding that the aid is incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid — Inadmissibility)

OJ C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 46–46 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

26.1.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/46


Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Ellinika Nafpigeia and Hoern v Commission

(Case T-466/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Shipbuilding - Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard - Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding that the aid is incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 26/91

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Ellinika Nafpigeia AE (Skaramagka, Greece), and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: K Chrysogonos and A. Mitsis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission letter C(2010) 8274 final of 1 December 2010 relating to ‘State aid case CR 16/2004 — Implementation of the negative Decision with recovery concerning State aid in favour of [the company Ellinika Nafpigeia AE] — Invocation by Greece of Article 346 paragraph 1 (b) TFEU and proceedings under Article 348 paragraph 1 TFEU’, as supplemented by the documents and other material on the file of which the applicants became partially aware in June 2011.

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application by Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas for leave to intervene.

3.

Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4.

The applicant for leave to intervene, Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas, shall bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.


Top