EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/155/42

Case T-158/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 May 2007 — Trek Bicycle v OHIM — Audi (ALLTREK) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ALLTREK — Earlier national word mark TREK — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/04)

SL C 155, 7.7.2007, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.7.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/22


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 May 2007 — Trek Bicycle v OHIM — Audi (ALLTREK)

(Case T-158/05) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark ALLTREK - Earlier national word mark TREK - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/04)

(2007/C 155/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Trek Bicycle Corp. (Waterloo, Wisconsin, United States) (represented by: J. Kroher and A. Hettenkofer, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially, B. Müller, subsequently, G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Audi AG (Ingolstadt, Germany) (represented by: L. von Zumbusch and M. Groebl, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2005 (Case R 587/2004-4) relating to Opposition Proceedings between Trek Bicycle Corp. and Audi AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its costs.


(1)  OJ C 171 of 9.7.2005.


Top