Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/042/53

    Case T-391/06: Action brought on 19 December 2006 — Karstadt Quelle v OHIM — dm drogerie markt (S-HE)

    SL C 42, 24.2.2007, p. 31–31 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.2.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 42/31

    Action brought on 19 December 2006 — Karstadt Quelle v OHIM — dm drogerie markt (S-HE)

    (Case T-391/06)

    (2007/C 42/53)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Karstadt Quelle Aktiengesellschaft (Essen, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and T. Dolde, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: dm drogerie markt GmbH

    Form of order sought

    —

    annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) No R 301/2006-1 of 26 September 2006;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: dm drogerie markt GmbH.

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘S-HE’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25, 28, 32, 38, 41 and 42 (Application No 2 766 723).

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘SHE’ for goods in Classes 3 and 25, German figurative mark ‘She’ for goods in Classes 3, 9, 16, 18 and 25, and international figurative mark ‘She’ for goods in Classes 3, 9, 16, 18 and 25.

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Partial granting of the appeal, partial rejection of the application.

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), on the ground that there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks in opposition.

    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

    Top