Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010CN0558

    Case C-558/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Chartres (France) lodged on 29 November 2010 — Michel Bourges-Maunoury, Marie-Louise Bourges-Maunoury (née Heintz) v Direction des Services Fiscaux d’Eure et Loir

    SL C 46, 12.2.2011, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.2.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 46/6


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Chartres (France) lodged on 29 November 2010 — Michel Bourges-Maunoury, Marie-Louise Bourges-Maunoury (née Heintz) v Direction des Services Fiscaux d’Eure et Loir

    (Case C-558/10)

    2011/C 46/09

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Tribunal de Grande Instance de Chartres

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: Michel Bourges-Maunoury, Marie-Louise Bourges-Maunoury (née Heintz)

    Defendant: Direction des Services Fiscaux d’Eure et Loir

    Question referred

    Is it contrary to the second paragraph of Article 13 of Chapter V of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, (1) annexed to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities, for the entirety of a taxpayer’s income, including Community income, to be taken into account in calculating the cap on wealth tax (‘impôt de solidarité sur la fortune’)?


    (1)  OJ 1967 L 152, p. 13, now Article 12 of Chapter V of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 266).


    Top