Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0450

    Case T-450/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Coverpla v OHIM — Heinz-Glas (Phial) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a bottle — Prior design — Ground for invalidity — Disclosure of prior design — Absence of novelty — Articles 5 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

    SL C 126, 28.4.2012, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.4.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 126/13


    Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Coverpla v OHIM — Heinz-Glas (Phial)

    (Case T-450/08) (1)

    (Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a bottle - Prior design - Ground for invalidity - Disclosure of prior design - Absence of novelty - Articles 5 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

    2012/C 126/25

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Coverpla (Nice, France) (represented by: P. Greffe and M. Chaminade, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Heinz-Glas GmbH (Piesau, Germany) (represented by: M. Pütz-Poulalion, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 July 2008 (Case R 1411/2007-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Heinz-Glas GmbH and Coverpla in respect of a Community design

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Coverpla to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.


    Top